NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B7 Environmental Sampling and Analysis · May 2017

Question 3 of 7: Two-Way ANOVA — Fill in the Blanks

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, May 2017 — 04-Env-B7, Environmental Sampling and Analysis (3 hours, closed book, approved non-programmable calculator only, statistical tables provided). The paper instructs "answer all 4 questions in Part A and any 2 questions in Part B"; as a study resource this solution answers all 7 questions in full, including all three Part B questions.

Reference texts: Walpole, Myers, Myers & Ye, Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientists (sampling designs, hypothesis tests, EDA/boxplots, ANOVA); Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering, ch. 2 (sampling protocol, QA/QC, monitoring program design).

Question 3: Two-Way ANOVA — Fill in the Blanks (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A 3×4 factorial design (Location × Season) with 2 replications per cell, so $N=3\times4\times2=24$ total observations. Printed values: $MS_A=80.17$, $SS_B=12.46$, $MS_{err}=3.79$, $SS_{total}=262.96$.

Find. Every blank cell of the ANOVA table, plus the significance conclusion for Location, Season and their interaction at α=0.05.

Approach. Fill the degrees of freedom from the design structure first ($df_A=a-1$, $df_B=b-1$, $df_{AB}=(a-1)(b-1)$, $df_{err}=ab(n-1)$, $df_{tot}=N-1$), back out each SS from whichever of $SS=MS\times df$ or $SS_{AB}=SS_{tot}-SS_A-SS_B-SS_{err}$ applies, then compute each $F=MS/MS_{err}$ and compare to the supplied F-table.

  1. Part (a) — Step 1: degrees of freedom. $df_A=3-1=2$, $df_B=4-1=3$, $df_{AB}=2\times3=6$, $df_{err}=3\times4\times(2-1)=12$, $df_{tot}=24-1=23$ (check: $2+3+6+12=23$ ✓).
  2. Step 2 — Location (A). $SS_A=MS_A\times df_A=80.17\times2=160.34$. $F_A=MS_A/MS_{err}=80.17/3.79=21.15$.
  3. Step 3 — Season (B). $MS_B=SS_B/df_B=12.46/3=4.153$. $F_B=MS_B/MS_{err}=4.153/3.79=1.096$.
  4. Step 4 — Error. $SS_{err}=MS_{err}\times df_{err}=3.79\times12=45.48$.
  5. Step 5 — Interaction (AB), by subtraction. $$SS_{AB}=SS_{tot}-SS_A-SS_B-SS_{err}=262.96-160.34-12.46-45.48=44.68$$ $$MS_{AB}=SS_{AB}/df_{AB}=44.68/6=7.447, \qquad F_{AB}=MS_{AB}/MS_{err}=7.447/3.79=1.965$$
  6. Step 6 — compare to F-critical (α=0.05, from the supplied table). $$\boxed{F_A=21.15 > F_{0.05}(2,12)=3.885 \Rightarrow \text{Location is significant}}$$ $$F_B=1.10 < F_{0.05}(3,12)=3.490 \Rightarrow \text{Season is NOT significant}, \qquad F_{AB}=1.97 < F_{0.05}(6,12)=2.996 \Rightarrow \text{Interaction is NOT significant}$$
Final Results — completed 2-way ANOVA table
SourceSSDFMSFSignificant at 5%?
Location (A)160.34280.1721.15Yes
Season (B)12.4634.1531.10No
Interaction (AB)44.6867.4471.97No
Error45.48123.79——
Total262.9623———

Conclusion. Only Location has a statistically significant effect on the measured response at the 5% level; neither Season nor the Location×Season interaction is significant. This means the response varies meaningfully from one sampling location to another, but not systematically across the four seasons sampled, and the location effect does not itself depend on which season the samples were taken in (no significant interaction).