18-Env-B9 Environmental Chemistry and Microbiology · May 2017
Question 5 of 18: Sludge Production With and Without Ferric Chloride, and Lime Requirement
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-B9, Environmental Chemistry/Microbiology. 3 hours duration; closed-book exam (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). The paper has two sections — Section 1: Chemistry (6 questions, 50 marks) and Section 2: Microbiology (12 questions, 50 marks) — eighteen questions constitute the complete exam and all are answered below. Total examination mark 100.
Reference texts. Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) (water chemistry, coagulation, sludge chemistry, disinfection); Metcalf & Eddy (Tchobanoglous, Stensel, Tsuchihashi & Burton), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) (chemical phosphorus precipitation, biomass stoichiometry, activated-sludge microbiology, SRT/F:M); Madigan, Martinko, Bender, Buckley & Stahl, Brock Biology of Microorganisms (14th ed.) (bacterial structure, growth kinetics, microbial physiology); Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada).
Section 1: Chemistry (6 questions, 50 marks)
Question 5: Sludge Production With and Without Ferric Chloride, and Lime Requirement (15 marks)
Find. (a) Mass and volume of raw (no-chemical) primary sludge; (b) mass and volume of chemical (FeCl₃-enhanced) sludge; (c) lime (Ca(OH)₂) required, if any, to supplement the natural alkalinity for the FeCl₃ reaction.
Approach. Compute dry-solids capture from each TSS-removal fraction, convert to wet sludge using moisture content and specific gravity; separately balance the FeCl₃–bicarbonate reaction to find the Fe(OH)₃ precipitate mass (added to the chemical sludge) and the alkalinity it consumes, then compare the alkalinity consumed against the 136 mg/L available to decide whether lime supplementation is needed.
Raw sludge (no chemical), 60% TSS removal. $$m_{dry}=0.60\times220\ \tfrac{\text{mg}}{\text{L}}\times1{,}000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d} = 132{,}000\ \text{g/d}=132.0\ \text{kg/d}$$ At 94% moisture, solids are 6% of wet mass: $$m_{wet}=\frac{132.0}{1-0.94}=2{,}200\ \text{kg/d}, \qquad \boxed{V_{no\text{-}chem}=\frac{2{,}200}{1.03\times1{,}000}=2.14\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}$$
Fe(OH)₃ precipitate from the FeCl₃ dose. Balancing $2\text{FeCl}_3+3\text{Ca(HCO}_3)_2\to2\text{Fe(OH)}_3+3\text{CaCl}_2+6\text{CO}_2$ (1 mol Fe(OH)₃ per mol FeCl₃), with $MW_{\text{FeCl}_3}=162.2$ and $MW_{\text{Fe(OH)}_3}=106.85\ \text{g/mol}$: $$n_{\text{FeCl}_3}=\frac{40{,}000\ \text{g/d}}{162.2\ \text{g/mol}}=246.6\ \text{mol/d} \;\Rightarrow\; m_{\text{Fe(OH)}_3}=246.6\times106.85=26{,}350\ \text{g/d}=26.35\ \text{kg/d}$$
Alkalinity consumed vs. available — is lime needed? The balanced reaction consumes 3 mol Ca(HCO₃)₂ (each equal to 2 eq $=100$ g CaCO₃-equivalent) per 2 mol FeCl₃: $$\text{alkalinity consumed}=\frac{3}{2}\times246.6\ \text{mol/d}\times100\ \text{g/mol} = 36{,}990\ \text{g/d} = 37.0\ \text{mg/L (as CaCO}_3\text{, over }Q\text{)}$$ Comparing against the 136 mg/L available: $$\text{residual alkalinity}=136-37.0=99.0\ \text{mg/L as CaCO}_3 \;(>0)$$ Since the natural alkalinity comfortably exceeds the FeCl₃ demand (and the 99 mg/L residual is well above the typical 50–70 mg/L minimum reserve used to protect downstream biological pH), $$\boxed{\text{no supplemental lime is required for this FeCl}_3\text{ dose}}$$