NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Env-B9 Environmental Chemistry and Microbiology · May 2017

Question 5 of 18: Sludge Production With and Without Ferric Chloride, and Lime Requirement

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2017 — 04-Env-B9, Environmental Chemistry/Microbiology. 3 hours duration; closed-book exam (approved Casio or Sharp calculator only). The paper has two sections — Section 1: Chemistry (6 questions, 50 marks) and Section 2: Microbiology (12 questions, 50 marks) — eighteen questions constitute the complete exam and all are answered below. Total examination mark 100.

Reference texts. Davis & Cornwell, Introduction to Environmental Engineering (6th ed.) (water chemistry, coagulation, sludge chemistry, disinfection); Metcalf & Eddy (Tchobanoglous, Stensel, Tsuchihashi & Burton), Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery (5th ed.) (chemical phosphorus precipitation, biomass stoichiometry, activated-sludge microbiology, SRT/F:M); Madigan, Martinko, Bender, Buckley & Stahl, Brock Biology of Microorganisms (14th ed.) (bacterial structure, growth kinetics, microbial physiology); Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality (Health Canada).

Section 1: Chemistry (6 questions, 50 marks)

Question 5: Sludge Production With and Without Ferric Chloride, and Lime Requirement (15 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantityValue
Flow rate, $Q$1,000 m³/d
Wastewater TSS220 mg/L
Alkalinity (as CaCO₃)136 mg/L
FeCl₃ dose40 kg/1,000 m³ → 40 kg/d
TSS removal, no chemical60%
TSS removal, with FeCl₃85%
Raw sludge SG / moisture1.03 / 94%
Chemical sludge SG / moisture1.05 / 92.5%

Find. (a) Mass and volume of raw (no-chemical) primary sludge; (b) mass and volume of chemical (FeCl₃-enhanced) sludge; (c) lime (Ca(OH)₂) required, if any, to supplement the natural alkalinity for the FeCl₃ reaction.

Approach. Compute dry-solids capture from each TSS-removal fraction, convert to wet sludge using moisture content and specific gravity; separately balance the FeCl₃–bicarbonate reaction to find the Fe(OH)₃ precipitate mass (added to the chemical sludge) and the alkalinity it consumes, then compare the alkalinity consumed against the 136 mg/L available to decide whether lime supplementation is needed.

  1. Raw sludge (no chemical), 60% TSS removal. $$m_{dry}=0.60\times220\ \tfrac{\text{mg}}{\text{L}}\times1{,}000\ \text{m}^3/\text{d} = 132{,}000\ \text{g/d}=132.0\ \text{kg/d}$$ At 94% moisture, solids are 6% of wet mass: $$m_{wet}=\frac{132.0}{1-0.94}=2{,}200\ \text{kg/d}, \qquad \boxed{V_{no\text{-}chem}=\frac{2{,}200}{1.03\times1{,}000}=2.14\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}$$
  2. Fe(OH)₃ precipitate from the FeCl₃ dose. Balancing $2\text{FeCl}_3+3\text{Ca(HCO}_3)_2\to2\text{Fe(OH)}_3+3\text{CaCl}_2+6\text{CO}_2$ (1 mol Fe(OH)₃ per mol FeCl₃), with $MW_{\text{FeCl}_3}=162.2$ and $MW_{\text{Fe(OH)}_3}=106.85\ \text{g/mol}$: $$n_{\text{FeCl}_3}=\frac{40{,}000\ \text{g/d}}{162.2\ \text{g/mol}}=246.6\ \text{mol/d} \;\Rightarrow\; m_{\text{Fe(OH)}_3}=246.6\times106.85=26{,}350\ \text{g/d}=26.35\ \text{kg/d}$$
  3. Chemical sludge (with FeCl₃), 85% TSS removal + precipitate. $$m_{TSS}=0.85\times220\times1{,}000=187{,}000\ \text{g/d}=187.0\ \text{kg/d}$$ $$m_{dry,total}=187.0+26.35=213.35\ \text{kg/d}$$ At 92.5% moisture: $$m_{wet}=\frac{213.35}{1-0.925}=2{,}844.7\ \text{kg/d}, \qquad \boxed{V_{chem}=\frac{2{,}844.7}{1.05\times1{,}000}=2.71\ \text{m}^3/\text{d}}$$
  4. Alkalinity consumed vs. available — is lime needed? The balanced reaction consumes 3 mol Ca(HCO₃)₂ (each equal to 2 eq $=100$ g CaCO₃-equivalent) per 2 mol FeCl₃: $$\text{alkalinity consumed}=\frac{3}{2}\times246.6\ \text{mol/d}\times100\ \text{g/mol} = 36{,}990\ \text{g/d} = 37.0\ \text{mg/L (as CaCO}_3\text{, over }Q\text{)}$$ Comparing against the 136 mg/L available: $$\text{residual alkalinity}=136-37.0=99.0\ \text{mg/L as CaCO}_3 \;(>0)$$ Since the natural alkalinity comfortably exceeds the FeCl₃ demand (and the 99 mg/L residual is well above the typical 50–70 mg/L minimum reserve used to protect downstream biological pH), $$\boxed{\text{no supplemental lime is required for this FeCl}_3\text{ dose}}$$
Sludge production and lime demand — final results
QuantityValue
Raw (no-chemical) sludge, dry / wet / volume132.0 kg/d / 2,200 kg/d / 2.14 m³/d
Fe(OH)₃ precipitate26.35 kg/d
Chemical sludge, dry / wet / volume213.35 kg/d / 2,844.7 kg/d / 2.71 m³/d
Alkalinity consumed by FeCl₃37.0 mg/L as CaCO₃ (of 136 available)
Lime (Ca(OH)₂) required0 kg/d — natural alkalinity is sufficient