NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

04-For-B7 Transportation of Forest Products · May 2013

Question 6 of 6: Gradeability

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Forest Engineering, 04-For-B7 Transportation of Forest Products, May 2013. Closed book; approved Casio/Sharp calculator only. 3 hours. Six question groups in two parts: Part A (Questions 1–4, choose 3 of 4, 60 points) and Part B (Questions 5–6, both compulsory, 60 points).

Reference texts: Heinimann, Forest Operations Engineering (forest transportation systems, vehicle/road interaction); Sessions, Forest Road Engineering Guidebook (road geometric design, stopping sight distance, road-surface traction); FPInnovations/FERIC reports (log-hauling vehicle configurations, tire-inflation systems, machine/vehicle productivity); Transportation Association of Canada (TAC), Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads (stopping sight distance formula, Canadian design practice); the exam's own “Required Propulsion Formulae” page (standard Davis-type railway tractive-effort and train-resistance equations, consistent with general railway/traction engineering practice, e.g. Hay, Railroad Engineering).

Check: the printed question text for Question 1 has three sub-parts (1.1, 1.2, 1.3), but the source's own mark-allocation table (page 4 of 4) lists only two 10-mark line items for Question 1 ("1.1 10 marks total", "1.2 10 marks total") -- no separate mark line for 1.3, even though every other Part A question group (2, 3, 4) prints exactly two sub-parts matching its two 10-mark line items. This looks like a table/print omission in the original exam rather than an instruction to skip 1.3 -- all three sub-parts are answered in full below, with the group shown as its 20 marks total per the printed table.

Question 6: Gradeability (32 marks total, 6.1–6.4)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

6.1 — Free body diagram at the point of wheel spin

Take $x$ along the road surface (positive up-slope) and $y$ perpendicular to the road surface (positive away from the surface). Three forces act on the wheel at the point where it is just about to spin: the weight $W$ acting vertically downward through the wheel centre, resolved into a down-slope component $W\sin\theta$ (along $-x$) and an into-surface component $W\cos\theta$ (along $-y$); the normal reaction $N$ from the road surface (along $+y$); and the tractive (friction) force $F_t$ the road surface exerts on the tire (along $+x$, up-slope), which reaches its maximum available value $f N$ exactly at the point of incipient spin.

θWNFₜ = f·NW sinθW cosθforest road surface
Fig. 1 — Free body diagram of a wheel on a gradient at the point of incipient spin. $N$ = normal reaction; $F_t = fN$ = maximum available tractive force; $W$ = weight, resolved into $W\sin\theta$ (down-slope) and $W\cos\theta$ (into-surface).

Sum of forces, $y$ (perpendicular to the surface): $$\sum F_y = 0: \quad N - W\cos\theta = 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad N = W\cos\theta$$ Sum of forces, $x$ (along the surface, at the point of incipient spin): $$\sum F_x = 0: \quad F_t - W\sin\theta = 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad F_t = W\sin\theta$$ with $F_t$ at its maximum value $fN$ exactly at this threshold.

6.2 — Deriving $\tan\theta = f$

At the instant the wheel is on the verge of spinning, the tractive force the tire can generate is at its maximum, $F_t = fN$, and the two equilibrium equations from 6.1 hold simultaneously: $N = W\cos\theta$ and $F_t = W\sin\theta$. Substituting the first into $F_t = fN$ gives $F_t = fW\cos\theta$, and setting this equal to the $x$-equation's $F_t = W\sin\theta$: $$fW\cos\theta = W\sin\theta \quad\Rightarrow\quad f = \frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta} = \tan\theta$$ The weight $W$ cancels, so the threshold grade at which a wheel begins to spin is independent of vehicle weight and depends only on the available tire-road friction coefficient $f$: any gradient with $\tan\theta$ still below $f$ can be climbed (traction exceeds the required down-slope force), while $\tan\theta > f$ means the required tractive force exceeds what friction can supply and the wheel spins.

6.3 — The friction coefficient $f$, and a reasonable value for a forest road

$f$ is the coefficient of traction (friction) mobilised between the tire and the road surface -- the same physical quantity as an ordinary friction coefficient, governing how much tangential (driving) force a given normal load can transmit before the tire loses grip and spins. It depends on the road surface material and condition (compacted gravel vs. loose or wet gravel, native soil, ice), tire tread and inflation, and vehicle speed. Unlike a paved highway (dry asphalt typically $f\approx0.7$–$0.9$), a forest road running on compacted gravel or native subgrade offers meaningfully lower and more variable traction, and drops further when wet or loosely surfaced. A reasonable design value for a well-built, dry-to-moist gravel forest road is $f\approx0.5$ (the low end of typical values, $f\approx0.3$, better reflects a wet or poorly maintained surface, and would be the conservative choice for a road that must remain climbable in all conditions).

6.4 — Maximum allowable road gradient

Given. $\tan\theta \le f$, assumed $f = 0.5$ (Q6.3, dry-to-moist compacted gravel forest road).

Find. The maximum gradient, expressed as a percent grade, that a wheel with this traction coefficient can climb before spinning.

  1. Convert the threshold condition to a percent grade. Road grade as a percent is $100\tan\theta$, so the traction-limited threshold $\tan\theta = f$ becomes: $$\text{Grade}_{max} = 100f = 100\times0.5 = \boxed{50\%}$$
Check: $50\%$ is the theoretical traction-limited gradient (the steepest slope this tire/surface pairing could climb at all before spinning) -- it is not a recommended design grade. Actual forest-road design grades are set well below this adhesion limit by geometric-design guidance (e.g. Sessions, favourable sustained grades typically $\le8\%$, short adverse pitches up to roughly $12$–$18\%$) to leave a safety margin for braking, control, wet-weather traction loss, and loaded-truck performance -- the $\tan\theta\le f$ model only answers "when does the wheel lose grip," not "what grade is safe to design and drive."
Question 6 — final results
PartResult
6.2$\tan\theta = f$ at incipient spin (derived from $\sum F_x=0$, $\sum F_y=0$)
6.3Assumed forest-road traction coefficient $f \approx 0.5$
6.4Traction-limited maximum gradient $= 100f = \boxed{50\%}$
Back to the paper →