NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-B10 · December 2019

Question 4 of 10: Why Gravity Varies with Latitude on a Spinning, Non-Spherical Earth

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Geological Engineering, 18-Geol-B10-1 Gravity and Magnetics Fields, 2019-Dec. Closed book; no calculator permitted. All ten questions require an answer in essay format, with diagrams used wherever appropriate. The exam instructs "choose six (6) of the following ten (10) questions, the first six as they appear in the answer book will be marked, each of equal value".

Reference texts: Telford, Geldart & Sheriff, Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed. (physical properties ch.2 & 5; gravimeters, gravity reduction, drift and tidal correction ch.2; magnetometers, gradiometers and magnetic surveying ch.4–5; anomaly enhancement and interpretation throughout); Kearey, Brooks & Hill, An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration, 3rd ed. (survey design, temporal-variation correction, case-history applications ch.6 & 7); Blakely, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications (potential-field theory, derivative and Fourier-domain filters, regional-residual separation ch.2, 9 & 12).

Question 4: Why Gravity Varies with Latitude on a Spinning, Non-Spherical Earth (Choose 6 of 10 – equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Two independent physical causes

The International Gravity Formula corrects observed gravity to a smooth reference value that already accounts for TWO physically distinct consequences of the Earth being a spinning, oblate (non-spherical) body, so that what remains after the correction is the geologically interesting anomaly rather than this large, predictable, latitude-dependent background.

(a) Spinning Earth: forces at a point P (b) Oblate cross-section: distance to centre rotation axis, ω P (mid-latitude) r (dist. to axis) g (true, toward centre) a_c = ω²r (outward from axis) a_c opposes g's vertical component → net measured gravity is REDUCED, most at the equator centre of mass R_eq (longer) equator point R_pole (shorter) pole point pole is closer to the centre of mass → stronger true attraction (1/R²) there
(a) At any point P off the rotation axis, the outward centrifugal acceleration ac=ω²r partially cancels the true, centrally-directed gravitational attraction g; it is largest and most directly opposing at the equator, and vanishes at the poles (r=0). (b) Because the Earth's true shape is an oblate spheroid (exaggerated here), the polar radius is roughly 21 km shorter than the equatorial radius, so a point at the pole is genuinely closer to the planet's centre of mass and experiences a stronger 1/R² attraction than an equatorial point, independent of rotation.

How the International Gravity Formula compensates

Both mechanisms make TRUE gravity increase smoothly and monotonically from equator to pole; the International Gravity (Somigliana/GRS80) Formula, g(φ) = ge(1+k sin²φ)/√(1−e²sin²φ), reproduces exactly this smooth theoretical trend for an idealized rotating, oblate reference ellipsoid at sea level. Subtracting g(φ) from an observed reading (the "latitude correction") therefore removes the large, purely geometric/rotational background — some 5,000+ mGal from equator to pole, dwarfing almost any geological anomaly — leaving only the smaller residual that reflects real subsurface density variation, which is the quantity of geological interest.