Question 2 of 5: Layered Confined System — Effective Conductivities, Vertical Flow, and Regional Discharge
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2018 — 04-Geol-A2 Hydrogeology. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Five questions constitute a complete paper and all five are of equal value; most call for an essay-format answer with clarity and organization counted. Unless stated otherwise, water density is taken as 1000 kg/m³, water viscosity as 0.001 kg/m-sec, and g as 9.81 m/s².
Reference texts: Freeze & Cherry, Groundwater (Prentice-Hall, 1979) — Darcy's law and anisotropic conductivity tensors, soil phase relations, permeameter testing, layered-medium effective conductivity, the Theis and Thiem well equations, image-well boundary methods, leaky-aquifer (Hantush-Jacob) theory, the Dupuit-Forchheimer approximation with areal recharge, and slug-test analysis (Hvorslev, Bouwer-Rice, Cooper-Bredehoeft-Papadopulos); Todd & Mays, Groundwater Hydrology — supplementary well-test and unconfined-flow methods; EGBC Geoscience Professional Practice Guidelines for assumption-disclosure conventions on open-book calculations.
Question 2: Layered Confined System — Effective Conductivities, Vertical Flow, and Regional Discharge (equal value)
Given. Three horizontal layers of intrinsic permeability and thickness as below; the exam's default fluid properties (1000 kg/m³, 0.001 kg/m-sec, $g=9.81\ \text{m/s}^2$) convert permeability to hydraulic conductivity since no test temperature is stated for this question. (b) pressure head 20 m of water at the top of the system, 90 m of water at the base. (c) piezometers 200 m apart, water levels 260 m and 245 m, aquifer extent 200 m perpendicular to flow.
Layer
Thickness
Permeability
Top
25 m
$3.2\times10^{-11}\ \text{m}^2$
Middle
20 m
$4.3\times10^{-12}\ \text{m}^2$
Bottom
35 m
$2\times10^{-13}\ \text{m}^2$
Find. (a) effective horizontal $K_h$ and vertical $K_v$ conductivity of the layered system. (b) vertical Darcy velocity through the stack. (c) volumetric discharge through the aquifer.
Approach. Convert each layer's permeability to hydraulic conductivity via $K=k\rho g/\mu$, then combine horizontally as a thickness-weighted arithmetic mean and vertically as a thickness-weighted harmonic mean. Part (b) uses the vertical $K_v$ with a total-head difference built from elevation head plus pressure head across the full 80 m stack. Part (c) uses the horizontal $K_h$ with the piezometric gradient over the full cross-sectional area.
Effective horizontal conductivity (thickness-weighted mean). With $B=25+20+35=80$ m:
$$K_h=\frac{K_1b_1+K_2b_2+K_3b_3}{B}=\frac{(3.139\times10^{-4})(25)+(4.2183\times10^{-5})(20)+(1.962\times10^{-6})(35)}{80}=\boxed{1.10\times10^{-4}\ \text{m/s}}.$$
Effective vertical conductivity (thickness-weighted harmonic mean).
$$K_v=\frac{B}{b_1/K_1+b_2/K_2+b_3/K_3}=\frac{80}{25/(3.139\times10^{-4})+20/(4.2183\times10^{-5})+35/(1.962\times10^{-6})}=\boxed{4.35\times10^{-6}\ \text{m/s}}.$$
$K_h/K_v\approx25.2$ — strongly anisotropic, as expected when a very low-$K$ bottom layer dominates the series (vertical) path while barely affecting the parallel (horizontal) average.
Part (b) — total head at top and bottom. Taking the base of the system as datum ($z=0$): $h_{\text{top}}=B+\psi_{\text{top}}=80+20=\boxed{100\ \text{m}}$, $h_{\text{bot}}=0+\psi_{\text{bot}}=\boxed{90\ \text{m}}$. Since $h_{\text{top}}>h_{\text{bot}}$, flow is downward through the system.