NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-A4 Structural Geology · Undated paper

Question 3 of 5: Quantitative Analyses

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

18-Geol-A4, Structural Geology — May 2019 (3 hours, closed book, one Casio/Sharp approved calculator, 100 marks; National Exams).

Reference texts: Davis & Reynolds, Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions (3rd ed.); Fossen, Structural Geology (2nd ed.); Marshak & Mitra, Basic Methods of Structural Geology.

Check: every page footer of the paper reads "18-Geol-A4 – May 2019", so this is the May 2019 sitting.

Question C — Quantitative Analyses (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given data
QuantityValue
Vertical max. principal stress, σ1120 MPa
Horizontal min. principal stress, σ340 MPa
Friction angle of the weakness plane, φf40°
Dip of the pre-existing plane of weakness30°
Cohesion of the weakness plane (pre-existing, hence taken frictional-only)cf = 0

Find. (a) The real-world geometry and sense of shear on the plane; (b) the normal stress σn; (c) the shear stress τ; (d) the shear strength τf at failure, whether the plane fails dry, and the pore pressure Pp needed if not; (e) confirmation of (b)–(d) on a plotted Mohr circle.

Approach. Resolve σ1 and σ3 onto the plane using the fundamental stress-transformation equations with θ measured from the σ1 direction to the plane's own normal (θ=dip, since a plane's normal is inclined from vertical by exactly the plane's dip — check: a horizontal, 0°-dip bed has a vertical normal, θ=0), compare the resolved shear stress to the Mohr–Coulomb (cohesionless) failure line, and back-solve for the pore pressure that would bring the plane to failure via the effective-stress principle.

weakness plane, dip 30° E σ1=120 MPa σ3=40 MPa σn τ (down-dip) Hanging wall (E, down) drops down-dip → footwall (W) relatively up: normal-sense, dextral in this view.
Fig. C1 – Real-world configuration (dip assumed to the east — see check note): σ1 vertical, σ3 horizontal, weakness plane dipping 30°, with the resolved normal stress σn and down-dip shear traction τ shown on the plane.
  1. Set up the angle from σ1 to the plane's normal. The plane dips 30° from horizontal, so its normal is inclined θ=30° from the vertical σ1 direction (a 0°-dip plane has a vertical normal, θ=0; a 90°-dip plane has a horizontal normal, θ=90° — θ tracks the dip directly).
  2. Normal stress on the plane (b). $$\sigma_n=\frac{\sigma_1+\sigma_3}{2}+\frac{\sigma_1-\sigma_3}{2}\cos2\theta=\frac{120+40}{2}+\frac{120-40}{2}\cos60^{\circ}=80+40(0.5)$$ $$\boxed{\sigma_n = 100.0\ \text{MPa}}$$
  3. Shear stress on the plane (c). $$\tau=\frac{\sigma_1-\sigma_3}{2}\sin2\theta=40\sin60^{\circ}$$ $$\boxed{\tau = 34.6\ \text{MPa}}$$ As a check, \((\sigma_n-80)^2+\tau^2=(20)^2+34.6^2\approx40^2\), confirming the point lies exactly on the Mohr circle of radius 40 MPa centred at 80 MPa.
  4. Shear strength at failure, dry (d-i, d-ii). The pre-existing plane is treated as cohesionless (\(c_f=0\), friction-only, since only φf is given): $$\tau_f=\sigma_n\tan\phi_f=100.0\tan40^{\circ}$$ $$\boxed{\tau_f = 83.9\ \text{MPa}}$$ Since the resolved shear stress \(\tau=34.6\) MPa is well BELOW the dry shear strength \(\tau_f=83.9\) MPa, the point (100.0, 34.6) plots comfortably below the Mohr–Coulomb envelope — the plane does NOT fail under dry conditions.
  5. Pore pressure required to trigger failure (d-iii). Effective stress reduces the normal stress acting across the plane, \(\sigma_n'=\sigma_n-P_p\), while the resolved \(\tau\) itself is unaffected by pore pressure (pore pressure is isotropic). Failure occurs when \(\tau\) equals the reduced strength \(\sigma_n'\tan\phi_f\): $$\tau=(\sigma_n-P_p)\tan\phi_f\ \Rightarrow\ P_p=\sigma_n-\frac{\tau}{\tan\phi_f}=100.0-\frac{34.6}{\tan40^{\circ}}$$ $$\boxed{P_p \approx 58.7\ \text{MPa}}$$ This is a large overpressure (comfortably below lithostatic \(\sigma_1=120\) MPa, but well above \(\sigma_3=40\) MPa), consistent with the plane being far from failure under dry conditions in step 4.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 -60 -40 -20 20 40 60 σn (MPa) τ (MPa) σ3 σ1 (100.0, 34.6) 2θ=60° τ=σntanφf (dry) (41.3, 34.6) on envelope Pp = 58.7 MPa shift
Fig. C2 – Mohr circle (centre 80 MPa, radius 40 MPa) with the plotted point (100.0, 34.6) at 2θ=60°, plus the dry Mohr–Coulomb envelope τ=σntan40° — the plotted point sits well inside (below) the envelope, confirming no failure at Pp=0 (d-ii). The dashed orange circle is the same circle shifted left by Pp=58.7 MPa (effective centre 21.3 MPa, σ3′=−18.7, σ1′=61.3 MPa): the plane’s point moves to (41.3, 34.6), which lies exactly on the envelope (41.3 tan40°=34.6), confirming d-iii.
Final results – Question C
QuantityValue
Sense of shear (assumed dip to the east)Right-lateral (dextral); normal-sense (hanging wall down-dip)
Normal stress, σn100.0 MPa
Shear stress, τ34.6 MPa
Shear strength at failure (dry), τf83.9 MPa
Fails dry?No — τ < τf by a wide margin
Pore pressure required, Pp≈58.7 MPa
Check: the source states only that the plane "dips 30°," not which compass direction — dip-to-the-east is adopted here as the stated assumption (per the exam's own Note 1, "submit a clear statement of any assumptions made"). The magnitudes of σn, τ, τf and Pp are unaffected by this choice, but the right-lateral/left-lateral call in (a) would flip to left-lateral if the plane instead dipped west. Since σ1 is vertical and exceeds σ3, this is an Andersonian extensional (normal-faulting) stress regime regardless of the assumed dip azimuth — the plane, if it slipped, would always show hanging-wall-down, normal-sense shear.