NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-A5 Rock Mechanics · Undated paper

Question 2 of 5: Support pressure for the Excavation Disturbed Zone (EDZ)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — 18-Geol-A5, Rock Mechanics. Closed-book, 3-hour exam; 5 questions of 20 marks each (80 marks total); candidates were instructed to answer only 4 of the 5 — all 5 are answered below. Every page footer of the paper reads “May 2019”.

Reference texts:

page-1 NOTES items (1–8), the Additional-Reference-Material section's own numbered Table/Figure captions (e.g. “1. Strength of intact rock material…”, “5. Groundwater…”, “Figure 6…”), and stray numbered lines bled from inside a question's own paragraph. It does not affect the solutions below, which are worked from the real printed question text (verified against the printed paper pages).
A few words of Question 5 are assumed from context. Page 8's thick-wall-cylinder formula prints “$P_r$” where the algebra requires a tangential stress; the standard thick-wall tangential-stress form is used below. The RMR discontinuity-spacing rating chart on page 12 is not used, because Table 1 (page 9) gives the same information in exact numeric form.

Question 2: Support pressure for the Excavation Disturbed Zone (EDZ) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

EDZ crown block, thickness t tunnel opening W = γ·t
Blast-fractured EDZ block at the tunnel crown; once separated by blast-induced fractures it hangs as a dead-weight block with no residual cohesion or arching support across those fractures.

Drilling-and-blasting excavation always damages the rock beyond the intended profile: the detonation stress wave and expanding gas pressure open new radial and circumferential fractures in an annular zone of rock around the opening, and where those fractures cross pre-existing joints they isolate discrete blocks that are no longer keyed to the surrounding rock mass. This blast-fractured annulus is the Excavation Disturbed Zone. Inside it, a block bounded on all sides by open, unfilled, blast-induced or pre-existing fractures has effectively zero cohesion and (once separated) very little frictional resistance along those fracture surfaces — it is held in place only by its interlock with neighbouring blocks, which the blast itself has just destroyed. Once that interlock is gone, the block's only remaining equilibrium condition is gravity versus whatever support pressure is applied at the excavation boundary.

Given. Rock unit weight $\gamma=25\ \text{kN/m}^3$; the EDZ is defined by the blast having fully disaggregated a layer of thickness $t$ around the opening into a loose, cohesionless, gravity- loaded block (no interlock, no arching once separated).

Find. The support pressure required to hold the loosened EDZ block in place.

Approach. Take a unit plan area of the crown block. With zero cohesion across the bounding fractures and no arching (the block has already separated from its neighbours), the block's only load path to failure is free-fall under gravity; the support pressure needed is simply the block's own weight per unit plan area, applied at the excavation boundary before the block can move.

  1. Free-body equilibrium of the loosened block. For a block of thickness $t$ and unit plan area $1\ \text{m}^2$, self-weight $W=\gamma \cdot t \cdot 1\ \text{m}^2$. With no cohesion or friction available along the bounding fractures (they are open, blast-created surfaces with no confinement holding them closed), the support pressure $p_s$ must balance this weight directly: $$p_s = \frac{W}{A} = \gamma\, t$$ This is the classical Terzaghi “dead-weight” or “loosening-pressure” design load — the lower-bound, most conservative case for roof support in blocky ground, since it assumes no arching redistributes any of the load to the surrounding rock.
  2. Illustrative numeric value. The EDZ thickness $t$ is not stated in this question (it depends on blast design — hole spacing, delay timing, presplitting/smooth-wall blasting practice, and the intact joint spacing); a commonly adopted design value for a controlled drill-and-blast excavation is $t\approx 0.5$ m (flagged explicitly below as an assumption, not given data). $$p_s=\gamma t = 25\ \text{kN/m}^3\times 0.5\ \text{m}=\boxed{12.5\ \text{kPa}}$$
Check: assumes an EDZ crown-block thickness $t\approx0.5$ m, a typical order-of- magnitude value for controlled drill-and-blast damage; the source gives no thickness, so the boxed numeric answer scales directly and linearly with whatever thickness a site-specific blast-damage survey (e.g. sonic/acoustic-televiewer logging of the actual EDZ extent) establishes. The governing symbolic relation, $p_s=\gamma t$, is the answer that does not depend on this assumption.
QuantityResult
Governing relation$p_s=\gamma t$ (dead-weight/loosening pressure)
Illustrative value ($t=0.5$ m)12.5 kPa