Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — May 2015 — 04-Geol-06, Soil Mechanics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; one of two approved calculators permitted, plus a compass and ruler. Candidates must answer Questions 1 to 5 and choose three of the five sub-questions in Question 6 (5 marks each); all five Question-6 parts are answered here as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: Das, Principles of Geotechnical Engineering — USCS classification (Q1), phase relations (Q2), consolidation theory (Q4), Boussinesq/Newmark stress-influence factors (Q4), flow nets and seepage (Q5), sand-cone compaction (Q6d); Craig, Craig's Soil Mechanics — Mohr-circle shear strength and limit-equilibrium slope stability (Q3), effective stress and capillarity (Q6b, Q6c); EGBC Geoscience Professional Practice Guidelines for assumption-disclosure conventions.
Check — reading notes. (1) Table Q1's percent-finer values are read as 99% and 98%; the sieve-size row labels "420 μm", "150 μm", "75 μm" are the No. 40, No. 100 and No. 200 sieves. (2) Figure Q5's flow net (equipotential/flow-line count, and the relative positions of points A–D on specific equipotentials) was read from the exam's printed figure — Nf=3 flow channels and Nd=8 equipotential drops, with A on drop 1, point 1 on drop 2, point 2/B on drop 3, point 3 on drop 4, point 4/C on drop 5, point 5 on drop 6, D on drop 7, and the downstream boundary at drop 8; this is a reading of the figure rather than printed exam text. (3) The elevation-head datum for Q5.2 is taken at the impervious layer (z=0), so the ground surface/dam base sits at z=H=10 m and the headwater surface at z=H+ht=20 m — this datum choice is the one that makes the given zA,zB,zC,zD values produce physically valid (positive) pore pressures at all four points, and is disclosed since the exam figure is schematic, not to scale. (4) Q4's Boussinesq corner-influence factors were computed directly from Newmark's closed-form integral rather than read from the exam's Table 8B.
Given. $L=20$ m, $H=10$ m (pervious layer thickness), $h_t=10$ m (headwater above ground; downstream water sits at ground level, i.e.\ zero tailwater), $D=1$ m sheet-pile embedment, $\gamma_w=10\text{ kN/m}^3$, $k=6\times10^{-3}\text{ cm/s}$. From the flow net: $N_f=3$ flow channels, $N_d=8$ equipotential drops.
Find. (1) $q$ per metre run of dam. (2) $h_{total}$, elevation head, pressure head at A, B, C, D. (3) Pore pressure at points 1–5 and the resulting uplift force.
Approach. Seepage quantity follows directly from $q=k\,\Delta h_{total}\,(N_f/N_d)$. Total head at any point is fixed by which equipotential (drop number $n$) it lies on: $h_{total}=h_{headwater}-n(\Delta h_{total}/N_d)$; pressure head follows from $h_{total}-z$, and pore pressure from $u=\gamma_w\times(\text{pressure head})$.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure Q5 (redrawn, schematic) — flow net beneath the dam/sheet-pile cutoff. Equipotential lines (blue) are numbered by drop from the headwater; point A sits on drop 1, points 1–5 on drops 2–6 respectively (B coincides with point 2's drop, C with point 4's drop), and D on drop 7. See the official exam paper.]
Part (1) — seepage quantity. With $k=6\times10^{-3}\text{ cm/s}=6\times10^{-5}\text{ m/s}$ and downstream water at ground level (so the full head loss is $\Delta h_{total}=h_t=10$ m):
$$q=k\,\Delta h_{total}\left(\frac{N_f}{N_d}\right)=6\times10^{-5}(10)\left(\frac{3}{8}\right)=\boxed{2.25\times10^{-4}\text{ m}^3\text{/s per m run}}$$
equivalently $\boxed{19.4\text{ m}^3/\text{day per m run}}$.
Part (2) — head at each equipotential drop. Head loss per drop: $\Delta h=h_t/N_d=10/8=1.25$ m. Taking the elevation datum at the impervious layer ($z=0$), the ground surface/dam base sits at $z=H=10$ m and the headwater surface at $z=H+h_t=20$ m, so
$$h_{total}(n)=20-1.25n$$
For A ($n=1$), B ($n=3$, shares point 2's equipotential), C ($n=5$, shares point 4's), D ($n=7$):
$$h_{total,A}=18.75\text{ m},\quad h_{total,B}=16.25\text{ m},\quad h_{total,C}=13.75\text{ m},\quad h_{total,D}=11.25\text{ m}$$
Part (2) — pressure head and pore pressure. Pressure head $\psi=h_{total}-z$; pore pressure $u=\gamma_w\psi$.
$$\psi_A=18.75-10=\boxed{8.75\text{ m}},\ u_A=\boxed{87.5\text{ kPa}}$$
$$\psi_B=16.25-15=\boxed{1.25\text{ m}},\ u_B=\boxed{12.5\text{ kPa}}$$
$$\psi_C=13.75-6=\boxed{7.75\text{ m}},\ u_C=\boxed{77.5\text{ kPa}}$$
$$\psi_D=11.25-9=\boxed{2.25\text{ m}},\ u_D=\boxed{22.5\text{ kPa}}$$
All four are positive, as required for saturated soil beneath the dam.
Part (3) — pore pressure at points 1–5. All five points sit at the dam-base elevation $z=H=10$ m, on drops $n=2,3,4,5,6$ respectively.
$$u(n)=\gamma_w\big[h_{total}(n)-10\big]=10\big[(20-1.25n)-10\big]=10(10-1.25n)$$
$$u_1=75\text{ kPa},\ u_2=62.5\text{ kPa},\ u_3=50\text{ kPa},\ u_4=37.5\text{ kPa},\ u_5=25\text{ kPa}$$
The pressure falls linearly (equal drops, equal 5 m spacing).
Part (3) — total uplift force. Trapezoidal integration of $u(x)$ over the 20 m base (equivalently, since the profile is exactly linear, the average ordinate times the base length):
$$U_{plift}=\frac{u_1+u_5}{2}\times L=\frac{75+25}{2}(20)=\boxed{1000\text{ kN per m run of dam}}$$
Pore-water-pressure diagram along the dam base, points 1–5 (linear, 75 kPa at point 1 to 25 kPa at point 5).