NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geol-A7 Applied Geophysics · December 2018

Question 10 of 10: Seismic Reflection — Source Gather Geometry, Multi-Layer Arrivals and Multiple Suppression

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2018 — 18-Geol-A7 Applied Geophysics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; approved Casio or Sharp calculator permitted. The paper offers a choice of six of the following ten questions, each worth 16.66% of the total mark, and every question requires an essay-format answer — this is a genuinely all-essay sitting with no numeric data, formula sheet, or figure supplied in the source. All ten questions are answered below so the set stands as a complete study resource for choose-N-of-M exams.

Reference texts: Telford, Geldart & Sheriff, Applied Geophysics (2nd ed.) — the primary reference for every method touched in this paper (electrical/EM methods, seismic refraction/reflection, radiometrics, magnetics, gravity, well logging); Kearey, Brooks & Hill, An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration (3rd ed.) — survey design, array geometry, data acquisition and processing; Blakely, Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications — magnetic-mineral behaviour and gravity reduction (Q5, Q7); Selley & Sonnenberg, Elements of Petroleum Geology — well-logging tool context (Q8).

Check: page 1's NOTES list is numbered 1–5 with a genuine duplicate — two distinct instructions are both numbered "5." (5. Each question should take about half an hour. / 5. All questions require an answer in essay format…).

Question 10: Seismic Reflection — Source Gather Geometry, Multi-Layer Arrivals and Multiple Suppression (16.66% of paper)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Source and sensor layout. A single source is placed at the centre of a symmetric "split spread" of geophones extending an equal distance to either side; every geophone records the shot simultaneously, giving a source gather in which travel time is plotted as a function of offset on both sides of the source.

S G-left G-right Layer 1/2 interface Layer 2/3 interface Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3 (half-space)
Split-spread source gather over three horizontal layers (layer 3 is the underlying half-space, so there are two reflecting interfaces): symmetric reflected raypaths from the layer 1/2 interface (red) and layer 2/3 interface (blue) to geophones on either side of the source.

Reflected arrivals for three horizontal layers. For each of the two reflecting interfaces the two-way travel time as a function of offset $x$ follows a hyperbola,

$$t(x)=\sqrt{t_0^2+\dfrac{x^2}{V_{rms}^2}}$$

where $t_0$ is the zero-offset (vertical) two-way time to that interface and $V_{rms}$ is the root-mean-square velocity of the layers above it. Because the deeper (layer 2/3) interface has a larger $t_0$ and generally a higher overlying $V_{rms}$, its hyperbola sits below and is flatter (less moveout with offset) than the shallower (layer 1/2) interface's hyperbola; being a split spread, both hyperbolas are symmetric about $x=0$ at the source.

offset (left) offset (right) S (x = 0) TWT increases downward Layer 1/2 (t01) Layer 2/3 (t02)
Two-way travel time (increasing downward, seismic convention) vs. offset for the source gather: symmetric hyperbolas, one per interface, flattening and deepening with depth.

Multiples. A multiple is energy that has reflected more than once before reaching a receiver. A surface (long-path) multiple, such as a marine water-bottom multiple, reverberates between the free surface and a strong reflector (e.g. the seabed) one or more extra times, arriving at close to an integer multiple of that reflector's primary zero-offset time. A peg-leg multiple takes one short extra bounce within a shallow layer (e.g. the water layer, or between the top and base of a hard limestone bed) on the way to or from a deeper reflector, so it arrives a little after that deeper primary. An interbed multiple bounces between two internal strong reflectors (e.g. a coal seam and an overlying limestone) and can closely mimic — and be mistaken for — a genuine deeper primary reflection.

Surface shallow interface deep interface primary surface multiple peg-leg
Multiples (schematic): primary reflection from the deep interface (solid); a first-order surface multiple of the shallow interface (red dashed) that reflects off it twice with an extra bounce at the surface, arriving at about twice that primary's zero-offset time; and a peg-leg multiple (blue dashed) with one extra short bounce between the two interfaces, arriving just after the deep primary.

Suppression. Multiples are attenuated during processing by exploiting the two properties in which they differ from primaries. Predictive deconvolution exploits their periodic timing (surface and peg-leg multiples repeat at a regular period set by the two-way time in the reverberating layer) to predict and subtract the repeating energy. Radon-transform (moveout-based) demultiple exploits the fact that, having travelled through more of the shallow, lower-velocity section per unit depth, a multiple has a distinctly different (typically lower) stacking velocity than the primary at the same travel time, so after NMO correction with the primary velocity the multiple is under- or over-corrected and separable in the velocity/offset (Radon) domain, where it can be muted before being transformed back. Finally, simple CMP stacking itself provides partial multiple attenuation, since a multiple imperfectly flattened by the primary's NMO velocity destructively interferes across the offset range of the gather, while the correctly-flattened primary stacks constructively.

Circumstances for use. Reflection surveying is used wherever detailed imaging of layered structure at depth is required — hydrocarbon and coal exploration and reservoir characterization, deep crustal/tectonic studies, and geotechnically for mapping bedrock structure, fault zones or buried channels too deep or geologically complex for refraction's simpler layered-velocity assumptions to resolve; its higher cost and more elaborate acquisition/processing are justified whenever fine structural or stratigraphic detail, not just a single depth-to-bedrock number, is the actual objective.

Back to the paper →