NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

18-Geom-A2 Adjustment of Observations · May 2014

Question 5 of 7: Best-Fit Parabola for a Vertical Curve

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2014 — 04-Geom-A2, Adjustment of Observations and Data Analysis. Three-hour, CLOSED-BOOK exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Format: seven questions are given and any five (20 marks each) constitute a complete paper — all seven are solved below for completeness. Least-squares adjustments are carried out in the Canadian survey frame (heights on CGVD2013, horizontal on NAD83(CSRS)); US-foot units are retained in Q4 wherever the printed question uses them.

Reference texts: Ghilani, Adjustment Computations: Spatial Data Analysis (6th ed., Wiley, 2017); Wolf & Ghilani, Elementary Surveying: An Introduction to Geomatics (15th ed., Pearson); Mikhail & Gracie, Analysis and Adjustment of Survey Measurements (Van Nostrand, 1981).

Method note. Every weighted least-squares result below was formed from the normal equations $N\hat{x}=A^{\mathsf T}W\,\ell$; the reference (unit-weight) standard deviation is $s_0=\sqrt{v^{\mathsf T}Wv/(n-u)}$ with $n$ observations and $u$ unknowns.

Question 5: Best-Fit Parabola for a Vertical Curve (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Nine measured elevations at full stations 10+00 through 18+00 along an existing sag vertical curve.

Find. The least-squares parabola $y=a_2x^2+a_1x+a_0$, the adjusted (on-curve) elevations, and the residuals.

474849505110+0011+0012+0013+0014+0015+0016+0017+0018+00Elevation (m)Stationbest-fit parabola
Figure 5.1 — Measured station elevations (dots) and the least-squares best-fit parabola (red). The curve is a sag with its low point near station 14+46.

Approach. Let $x$ be the station count from the start ($x=0$ at 10+00, $x=8$ at 18+00) and fit a second-degree polynomial by least squares (nine observations, three unknowns), then evaluate the curve and residuals at each station.

  1. Set up the observation equations. Each station gives $a_2x_i^2+a_1x_i+a_0=y_i+v_i$. Stacking all nine into $A\hat a=\ell+v$ with $\hat a=[a_2,a_1,a_0]^{\mathsf T}$ (equal weights, since all elevations share the same precision).
  2. Solve the normal equations. $\hat a=(A^{\mathsf T}A)^{-1}A^{\mathsf T}\ell$ gives $$\boxed{y=0.222511\,x^2-1.983420\,x+51.234545}\qquad(x=\tfrac{\text{sta}-(10{+}00)}{100})$$
  3. Low point. The vertex is at $x=-a_1/(2a_2)=4.457$, i.e. station $14{+}45.7$, elevation $46.81$ m — a genuine sag curve since $a_2>0$.
  4. Adjusted elevations and residuals. Evaluating $y(x_i)$ and $v_i=y(x_i)-y_i^{\text{obs}}$ station by station gives residuals no larger than $61$ mm, listed below. The residuals change sign repeatedly along the curve with no run of one sign at either end, confirming a good parabolic fit with no systematic trend.
StationObserved (m)Best-fit (m)Residual (mm)
10+0051.251.235+35
11+0049.549.474−26
12+0048.248.158−42
13+0047.347.287−13
14+0046.846.861+61
15+0046.946.880−20
16+0047.347.344+44
17+0048.348.254−46
18+0049.649.608+8