23-Ind-A5 Quality Planning, Control, and Assurance · December 2015
Question 5 of 6: Attributes Charts — p-Chart Design, Revision, and ARL-Based np-Chart Sizing
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, December 2015. Closed-book examination. Any five of the six questions constitute a complete paper; all six are answered in full below. Relevant statistical tables (cumulative standard normal, normal tolerance-limit factors, cumulative Poisson, MIL-STD-105E code letters and master sampling table) are reproduced/applied from the paper's own attached appendices.
Reference texts: Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (8th ed.) — Ch. 5–6 (variables control charts, including individuals/moving-range charts), Ch. 7 (attributes charts and average run length), Ch. 8 (process and measurement-system capability, natural tolerance limits), Ch. 13 (reliability and life testing), Ch. 15 (acceptance sampling by attributes, MIL-STD-105E and Dodge–Romig plans).
A p-chart monitors the proportion (fraction) of nonconforming units in a sample of fixed (or slowly varying) size $n$, where each inspected unit is classified simply as conforming or nonconforming (a Bernoulli/binomial attribute) — a single unit can only count once against the tally, however many individual defects it might carry. A u-chart monitors the average number of defects PER UNIT, appropriate when a single inspected unit (or a fixed inspection area/length/time) can carry any number of individual defects, modelled as a Poisson count; the u-chart is used precisely when "how many separate flaws does this unit have" is the meaningful quality measure rather than a simple pass/fail classification (e.g. blemishes per painted panel, solder defects per board). Both charts allow the sample/inspection-unit size to vary sample-to-sample, with control limits recalculated (widened for smaller $n$, narrowed for larger $n$) accordingly; a p-chart uses $n_i$ (units inspected) while a u-chart uses $n_i$ inspection units of possibly varying total area/length.
(b) p-chart set-up, revision, and largest $p_1$ for $ARL_{p_1}\ge100$
Find. The p-chart's centre line and trial limits, the in-control $p_0$ (after any needed revision), and the largest shifted proportion $p_1$ for which $ARL_{p_1}\ge100$.
Centre line and trial limits. $\bar p=\dfrac{\sum d_i}{10(100)}=\dfrac{30}{1000}=0.03$.
$$UCL_p=\bar p+3\sqrt{\frac{\bar p(1-\bar p)}{n}}=0.03+3\sqrt{\frac{0.03(0.97)}{100}}=\boxed{0.0812},\qquad LCL_p=0.03-3\sqrt{\frac{0.03(0.97)}{100}}<0\Rightarrow LCL_p=\boxed{0}.$$
Check for revision. The 10 sample proportions ($2\%,5\%,0\%,6\%,4\%,4\%,2\%,3\%,1\%,3\%$) all fall between 0 and $UCL_p=0.0812$ — no point signals out of control, so no revision is needed: $p_0=\bar p=\boxed{0.030}$.
Largest $p_1$ keeping $ARL_{p_1}\ge100$. With $LCL_p=0$, a shifted proportion above $p_0$ can only signal via the UPPER limit, so $ARL_{p_1}=1/P(\hat p>UCL_p\mid p=p_1)$. Requiring $ARL_{p_1}\ge100$ means $P(\hat p>UCL_p)\le0.01$, i.e. $\dfrac{UCL_p-p_1}{\sqrt{p_1(1-p_1)/n}}\ge z_{0.01}=2.326$. Solving this (mildly nonlinear in $p_1$) numerically gives
$$\boxed{p_1=0.0372\ (3.72\%)}\quad\text{at which }P(\text{signal})=0.0100,\ ARL_{p_1}=100.$$
Any $p_1$ larger than 0.0372 pushes the signal probability above 1%, dropping $ARL_{p_1}$ below 100, so 0.0372 is the largest value satisfying the requirement.
p-chart for the 10 hourly samples ($n=100$) — every point is inside the trial limits, so $p_0=\bar p=0.030$ stands without revision.
(c) Minimum-$n$ np-chart with a positive LCL, and its ARL at $p_1$
Given. $p_0=0.030$ (from part b). Requirement: an np-chart (plotting the COUNT of nonconforming parts, not the proportion) whose lower control limit is strictly positive.
Find. The minimum sample size $n$, the resulting control limits, and $ARL_{p_1}$ at $p_1=0.0372$ (from part b).
Minimum $n$ for $LCL_{np}>0$. $LCL_{np}=np_0-3\sqrt{np_0(1-p_0)}>0\ \Rightarrow\ n>\dfrac{9(1-p_0)}{p_0}=\dfrac{9(0.97)}{0.03}=291.0$, so the minimum integer sample size is $\boxed{n=292}$.
Control limits at $n=292$. Centre line $=np_0=292(0.03)=8.76$.
$$UCL_{np}=np_0+3\sqrt{np_0(1-p_0)}=8.76+3\sqrt{292(0.03)(0.97)}=\boxed{17.50},\qquad LCL_{np}=8.76-3\sqrt{292(0.03)(0.97)}=\boxed{0.015>0}.$$
$ARL_{p_1}$ for this chart. At the shifted proportion $p_1=0.0372$, the count of nonconforming parts in $n=292$ has mean $np_1=10.86$ and standard deviation $\sqrt{np_1(1-p_1)}=3.226$. The (normal-approximation) probability of a point exceeding $UCL_{np}=17.50$ is
$$P(\text{signal})=P\!\left(Z>\frac{17.50-10.86}{3.226}\right)=P(Z>2.058)=0.0198,\qquad ARL_{p_1}=\frac{1}{0.0198}=\boxed{50.5}.$$
Check: an exact binomial calculation at $n=292,\,p_1=0.0372$ gives $P(D>17)=0.0263$ ($ARL\approx38$) rather than the normal-approximation value above — the normal approximation is somewhat optimistic here because $np_1(1-p_1)\approx10.5$ is only moderately large. The normal-approximation ARL of 50.5 is reported as the primary answer for methodological consistency with part (b), with the exact-binomial figure noted as the more accurate cross-check.
Quantity
Value
$p_0$ (in-control, part b)
0.030
Largest $p_1$ with $ARL_{p_1}\ge100$
0.0372
Minimum np-chart sample size
292
$UCL_{np}$, $LCL_{np}$
17.50, 0.015
$ARL_{p_1}$ at $n=292$ (normal approx / exact binomial)