NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Ind-B1 Reliability and Maintainability · May 2015

Question 5 of 10: Marathon Training — Simple Linear Regression, ANOVA, Intervals

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — May 2015 — 98-Ind-B1 Applied Probability & Statistics. Three-hour, closed-book exam; one of two permitted calculators (Sharp or Casio), one 8.5″×11.0″ aid sheet (both sides), statistical tables supplied. Format: three sections — Section A: do 2 of 4 questions (10 marks); Section B: do 2 of 3 (20 marks); Section C: do 1 of 3 (20 marks) — a 5-question, 50-mark paper as printed. All ten questions across the three sections are solved below for completeness.

Reference texts: Montgomery & Runger, Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers (7th ed., Wiley) — joint distributions (ch. 5), binomial/geometric probability (ch. 3), normal distribution and sampling distributions (ch. 4–7), point/interval estimation (ch. 8–9), hypothesis testing incl. sample-size design (ch. 9–10), simple linear regression and ANOVA (ch. 11–13), Bartlett's and Tukey's tests, single-degree-of-freedom contrasts and 23 factorial designs (ch. 13–14). Montgomery, Peck & Vining, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis (6th ed., Wiley) — multiple regression by matrices, confidence/prediction intervals (ch. 2–3).

Question 5 (Section B.1): Marathon Training — Simple Linear Regression, ANOVA, Intervals (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Six races, completion time (minutes) vs. race number:

Race $x$123456
Time $y$240240230225205210

Find. (a) $\hat y=a+bx$; (b) ANOVA $F$-test for the slope; (c) 95% PI at $x=8$; (d) $t$-test on $a$; (e) qualitative comparison of prediction uncertainty; (f) 95% CI for the mean of 30 future runners at $x=8$.

Approach. Compute least-squares $\hat a,\hat b$ from $S_{xx},S_{xy}$, run the regression ANOVA $F$-test, then use the standard $t$-based interval formulas at $x_0=8$ for a single new observation, for the slope/intercept tests, and for the mean of $m=30$ future observations.

Race number, x Time (min), y 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 200 250 fitted line, slope −7.43 min/race
Fig. Q5 — race time vs. race number, six observed races (blue) and the least-squares fit (red dashed); the requested prediction point $x=8$ lies outside this observed range.
  1. (a) Least-squares fit. $\bar x=3.5$, $\bar y=225$, $S_{xx}=\sum(x_i-\bar x)^2=17.5$, $S_{xy}=\sum(x_i-\bar x)(y_i-\bar y)=-130$. $$\hat b=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}=\frac{-130}{17.5}=-7.4286,\qquad \hat a=\bar y-\hat b\bar x=225-(-7.4286)(3.5)=251.0$$ $$\boxed{\hat y = 251.0 - 7.4286x}$$
  2. (b) ANOVA $F$-test for the linear relationship. Residual sum: $SSE=\sum(y_i-\hat y_i)^2=134.29$. Using the given $SST=1100$: $SSR=SST-SSE=965.71$. $$F=\frac{SSR/1}{SSE/(n-2)}=\frac{965.71}{134.29/4}=\frac{965.71}{33.57}=\boxed{28.77}$$ $F_{0.05,1,4}=7.709$; since $28.77\gt 7.709$, reject $H_0:\beta=0$ — a significant linear relationship exists between race number and time.
  3. (c) 95% prediction interval at $x_0=8$. $\hat y_0=251.0-7.4286(8)=191.57$. With $s=\sqrt{MSE}=\sqrt{33.57}=5.794$ and $t_{0.025,4}=2.776$: $$se_{pred}=s\sqrt{1+\tfrac1n+\tfrac{(x_0-\bar x)^2}{S_{xx}}}=5.794\sqrt{1+\tfrac16+\tfrac{(4.5)^2}{17.5}}=8.833$$ $$PI=191.57\pm 2.776(8.833)=\boxed{(167.0,\ 216.1)\text{ min}}$$
  4. (d) Is the intercept $a$ significantly different from 0? $se_{\hat a}=s\sqrt{\tfrac1n+\tfrac{\bar x^2}{S_{xx}}}=5.794\sqrt{\tfrac16+\tfrac{12.25}{17.5}}=5.394$. $$t=\frac{251.0-0}{5.394}=\boxed{46.5}$$ Since $46.5\gg t_{0.025,4}=2.776$ ($p\lt 0.001$), the intercept is significantly different from 0.
  5. (e) Race 10 vs. race 8, no new calculation. The prediction-interval width grows with $(x_0-\bar x)^2/S_{xx}$; race 10 is farther from $\bar x=3.5$ than race 8 ($6.5^2=42.25$ vs. $4.5^2=20.25$), so the interval for race 10 would be visibly wider, and it also extrapolates further beyond the observed range (races 1–6) — both push the prediction toward less certainty.
  6. (f) 95% CI for the mean of $m=30$ new runners at $x_0=8$. The standard error for the mean of $m$ future observations replaces the "$1$" in step (c) with "$1/m$": $$se_{mean}=s\sqrt{\tfrac1{30}+\tfrac16+\tfrac{(4.5)^2}{17.5}}=6.750$$ $$CI=191.57\pm 2.776(6.750)=\boxed{(172.8,\ 210.3)\text{ min}}$$ — narrower than the single-runner PI in (c), as expected when averaging over 30 runners.
Summary
PartResult
(a) fit$\hat y=251.0-7.4286x$
(b) $F$, verdict28.77 > 7.709; significant slope
(c) 95% PI, race 8(167.0, 216.1) min
(d) $t$, verdict46.5; $a\ne 0$
(f) 95% CI, mean of 30(172.8, 210.3) min
Check — extrapolation Race 8 (and race 10 in (e)) both lie outside the observed range of races 1–6; the intervals in (c)/(f) assume the linear trend continues, which is an engineering judgment call the exam itself invites by asking for these specific predictions.