NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

23-Ind-B2 Manufacturing Processes · December 2016

Question 3 of 7: Metal Chip Types, Built-Up Edge, and the Orthogonal-Cutting Shear Angle

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2016 — 98-Ind-B2 Manufacturing Processes. Closed book; Casio or Sharp approved calculators only. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value (20 marks each). Answers are written in point form but fully, with all calculations shown, as instructed. Complete answers to all seven questions follow.

Reference texts: Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, 6th ed. — material selection, casting, metal-cutting theory, welding processes, polymer processing, statistical process control; Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 8th ed. — acceptance sampling, control charts, the Deming/Taguchi quality philosophies.

Q2 = December 2013 Q2 (casting process factors, s​hell molding, permanent-mold casting); Q3 = December 2013 / May 2015 Q3 (metal chip types, built-up edge, orthogonal-cutting shear-angle calculation); Q4 = December 2013 / May 2015 Q4 (factors in metal cutting, tool wear/surface finish/machinability, cutting trends); Q5 = December 2014 Q5 (grinding operation characteristics, design considerations, economics of finish/accuracy); Q6 = December 2014 / December 2015 Q6 (residual stress in welding, joint/process selection, welding trends); Q7 = December 2013 / December 2015 Q7 (statistical process control, acceptance sampling/AQL, Deming and Taguchi methods).

Question 3: Metal Chip Types, Built-Up Edge, and the Orthogonal-Cutting Shear Angle (20 marks: 7/7/6)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(i) Types of Metal Chips and the Preferred Type

Metal-cutting chips are classified into four basic types by how the material deforms and separates ahead of the tool: (1) discontinuous chips, small segmented fragments produced when a brittle work material (or a ductile one cut at low speed with a small rake angle and high friction) fractures repeatedly ahead of the tool rather than flowing plastically; (2) continuous chips, a long unbroken ribbon formed when a ductile material is cut at high speed with a large rake angle and low friction, deforming plastically along the shear plane without fracturing; (3) continuous chips with a built-up edge (BUE), a continuous chip whose formation is disrupted by work material welding to and periodically breaking away from the tool's cutting edge; and (4) serrated (segmented) chips, semi-continuous chips with a saw-tooth profile of alternating zones of high and low shear strain. They form in metals with low thermal conductivity whose strength falls sharply with temperature (titanium alloys, nickel-base superalloys, austenitic stainless steels), because shear localizes into narrow bands.

The continuous chip (without BUE) is generally the best of the four: it gives a good, consistent surface finish and stable cutting forces, whereas discontinuous and serrated chips cause cyclic force fluctuations (and chatter) and a rougher finish, and a built-up edge degrades surface finish and dimensional accuracy and accelerates tool wear. The one practical drawback of a plain continuous chip is that the long ribbon can tangle around the tool, fixture or workpiece, which is why chip breakers are commonly added to curl and fracture an otherwise continuous chip into manageable lengths without sacrificing its favourable cutting mechanics.

(ii) Built-Up Edge: Effect and Control

A built-up edge (BUE) is a layer of work material that adheres to the tool's rake face at the cutting edge under the high pressure, temperature and friction of the cutting zone, welding itself to the tool. As successive layers accumulate the BUE grows until it becomes unstable and breaks away, with part of it carried off in the chip and part deposited onto the newly cut surface, then the cycle repeats.

Effects on the operation: BUE effectively (and unpredictably) changes the tool's actual rake angle and edge geometry, so cutting forces fluctuate; fragments deposited on the finished surface produce a rough, work-hardened surface finish and poor dimensional control; and the repeated welding/tearing cycle accelerates tool wear (particularly the crater and flank wear that determine tool life).

BUE can be eliminated or minimized by: increasing cutting speed (higher temperature reduces the material's tendency to adhere); increasing the tool's rake angle (reduces the contact pressure and friction on the rake face); reducing the depth of cut/feed; using an effective cutting fluid to reduce friction and carry away heat; and selecting a tool material/coating with lower chemical affinity for the work material, since BUE is fundamentally an adhesion (micro-welding) phenomenon between the two.

(iii) Orthogonal Cutting: Determining the Shear Angle

Given. Undeformed (uncut) chip thickness $t_0 = 0.0098$ in.; actual (deformed) chip thickness $t_c = 0.0169$ in.; rake angle $\alpha = 20^{\circ}$.

Find. The shear angle $\phi$ of the shear plane along which the chip is formed.

v Workpiece Tool Chip α φ t₀ tᶜ
Orthogonal cutting geometry (schematic): rake angle $\alpha$, shear plane at angle $\phi$ to the direction of relative motion $v$, uncut chip thickness $t_0$ separating along the shear plane into the deformed chip of thickness $t_c$.

Approach. Compute the chip-thickness (chip-compression) ratio $r=t_0/t_c$, then apply Ernst & Merchant's orthogonal-cutting shear-angle relation, which follows from the geometry of the shear-plane/chip triangle.

  1. Chip-thickness ratio. $r=\dfrac{t_0}{t_c}=\dfrac{0.0098}{0.0169}=\boxed{0.580}$.
  2. Shear-angle relation. The shear angle satisfies $\tan\phi=\dfrac{r\cos\alpha}{1-r\sin\alpha}$. Substituting $r=0.580$ and $\alpha=20^{\circ}$: $\tan\phi=\dfrac{0.580\cos20^{\circ}}{1-0.580\sin20^{\circ}}=\dfrac{0.580(0.9397)}{1-0.580(0.3420)}=\dfrac{0.5450}{0.8016}=0.6800$.
  3. Solve for $\phi$. $\phi=\arctan(0.6800)=\boxed{34.2^{\circ}}$.
Question 3(iii) — final results
QuantityValue
Chip-thickness ratio, $r$0.580
Shear angle, $\phi$34.2°