NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

21-Mat-A1 Thermodynamics · December 2015

Question 6 of 7: Galvanic Cell Thermodynamics — Zn/Cu²⁺ and the Nernst Equation

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams — December 2015 — 10-Met-A1 Metallurgical Thermodynamics. Three-hour, closed-book exam using an approved (Casio or Sharp) calculator; candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions. Any five of the seven questions constitute a complete paper — all seven are solved below for completeness. All questions are of equal value (20 marks each out of 100).

Reference texts: Gaskell, D. R., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials (2nd–5th ed.) — the exam's own Ellingham diagram (Fig. 9-3) is reproduced from this text, which also supplies the standard-state 298 K enthalpy/entropy data used in Question 7; supporting 298 K entropies for CO(g), CO₂(g), H₂(g) and H₂O(g) from the NIST–JANAF Thermochemical Tables.

Question 6: Galvanic Cell Thermodynamics — Zn/Cu²⁺ and the Nernst Equation (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Half-reaction$E^\circ$ (V)
Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Cu(s) (cathode, reduction)+0.34
Zn²⁺ + 2e⁻ → Zn(s) (anode, reverse of oxidation)−0.76

Find. (a) $E^\circ_{cell}$. (b) $\Delta G^\circ$. (c) $K$. (d) $E_{cell}$ at $[\text{Cu}^{2+}]=0.5$ M, $[\text{Zn}^{2+}]=2.0$ M.

Approach. Zn is oxidized (anode) and Cu²⁺ is reduced (cathode), so $E^\circ_{cell}=E^\circ_{cathode}-E^\circ_{anode}$; then $\Delta G^\circ=-nFE^\circ$, $\Delta G^\circ=-RT\ln K$, and finally the Nernst equation for the non-standard concentrations.

  1. (a) Standard cell potential. $n=2$ electrons transferred. $$E^\circ_{cell}=E^\circ_{Cu^{2+}/Cu}-E^\circ_{Zn^{2+}/Zn}=0.34-(-0.76)=\boxed{1.10\ \text{V}}.$$
  2. (b) Standard free energy. $$\Delta G^\circ=-nFE^\circ=-(2)(96{,}485)(1.10)=\boxed{-212{,}267\ \text{J/mol}}=-212.3\ \text{kJ/mol}.$$ Strongly negative, confirming the reaction is spontaneous as written under standard conditions.
  3. (c) Equilibrium constant. From $\Delta G^\circ=-RT\ln K$: $$\ln K=\frac{-\Delta G^\circ}{RT}=\frac{212{,}267}{(8.314)(298.15)}=85.63\ \Longrightarrow\ K=\boxed{1.5\times10^{37}}.$$ Such a huge $K$ reflects the large $E^\circ_{cell}$ — the reaction runs essentially to completion.
  4. (d) Cell potential at the stated concentrations. Reaction quotient $Q=[\text{Zn}^{2+}]/[\text{Cu}^{2+}]=2.0/0.5=4.0$ (solids omitted). Nernst equation: $$E=E^\circ-\frac{RT}{nF}\ln Q=1.10-\frac{(8.314)(298.15)}{(2)(96{,}485)}\ln(4.0)=1.10-(0.01285)(1.386)=\boxed{1.082\ \text{V}}.$$ Moving both concentrations away from 1 M in the direction that favours the forward reaction ($\text{Cu}^{2+}$ depleted, $\text{Zn}^{2+}$ built up) drops $Q$ below what standard conditions would give at equilibrium, but here $Q>1$ still pulls $E$ slightly below $E^\circ$.
PartResult
(a) $E^\circ_{cell}$1.10 V
(b) $\Delta G^\circ$−212.3 kJ/mol
(c) $K$1.5 × 1037
(d) $E_{cell}$ (Nernst)1.082 V