21-Mat-A2 Materials Transport Phenomena · December 2015
Question 8 of 8: Hydrostatic Casting Forces on a Spherical Die-Cast Mold
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams — December 2015 — 10-Met-A2 Metallurgical Rate Phenomena. Three-hour, open-book exam; any non-communicating calculator permitted. Candidates answer Question 1 (compulsory) plus any four of Questions 2–8; the five answered count equally (20 marks each). All eight are solved below for completeness. Candidates were told to state any interpretive assumptions where doubt exists.
Reference texts: Geiger, G. H. & Poirier, D. R., Transport Phenomena in Materials Processing (TMS) — the primary reference for the momentum-, heat- and mass-transfer analyses in Questions 3, 6, 7 and 8; Szekely, J., Evans, J. W. & Sohn, H. Y., Rate Phenomena in Process Metallurgy — reactor-network and interfacial mass-transfer modelling (Questions 2, 3); Welty, J. R. et al., Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer — dimensional analysis and pipe-friction data (Questions 4, 7); Gaskell, D. R., Introduction to the Thermodynamics of Materials — Fe–C phase relations (Question 1h).
Question 8: Hydrostatic Casting Forces on a Spherical Die-Cast Mold (20 marks)
Fig. 8 — spherical die-cast mold: hydrostatic force splits unevenly between the top and bottom halves.
Given. Hollow spherical mold cavity, radius $R$, diameter $D=2R$, filled with molten zinc alloy of density $\rho$; $z=0$ at the top (fill point), $z=D$ at the bottom; gauge pressure referenced to zero at the top vent.
Find. $F_{top}$ and $F_{bottom}$ (vertical forces on the top and bottom hemispherical wall halves), each expressed as a multiple of the total metal weight $W$.
Approach. Parametrize the sphere by polar angle $\theta$ from the top ($z=R(1-\cos\theta)$), write the local hydrostatic gauge pressure $P(\theta)=\rho g z(\theta)$, project it onto the vertical direction, and integrate over each hemisphere.
Geometry and pressure. At polar angle $\theta$ (0 at top, $\pi$ at bottom): $z(\theta)=R(1-\cos\theta)$, surface element $dA=2\pi R^2\sin\theta\,d\theta$, outward-normal vertical component $n_z=-\cos\theta$ (positive $z$ downward), and gauge pressure $P(\theta)=\rho g R(1-\cos\theta)$.
Vertical force element. The liquid pushes outward on the wall with pressure $P(\theta)$; its vertical (downward-positive) component per unit area is $P(\theta)\,n_z$, so
$$dF_z=P(\theta)(-\cos\theta)(2\pi R^2\sin\theta)\,d\theta=-2\pi\rho gR^3(1-\cos\theta)\cos\theta\sin\theta\,d\theta$$
Top half, $\theta:0\to\pi/2$ ($z:0\to R$). With $u=\cos\theta$: $\displaystyle\int_0^{\pi/2}(1-\cos\theta)\cos\theta\sin\theta\,d\theta=\int_0^1(1-u)u\,du=\tfrac16$, so
$$F_{top}=-2\pi\rho gR^3\left(\tfrac16\right)=-\dfrac{\pi\rho gR^3}{3}$$
(negative $\Rightarrow$ net force is upward: the dome-shaped top half is pushed up and outward by the melt.)
Bottom half, $\theta:\pi/2\to\pi$ ($z:R\to D$). Same substitution gives $\displaystyle\int_{\pi/2}^{\pi}(1-\cos\theta)\cos\theta\sin\theta\,d\theta=-\tfrac56$, so
$$F_{bottom}=-2\pi\rho gR^3\left(-\tfrac56\right)=\dfrac{5\pi\rho gR^3}{3}$$
(positive $\Rightarrow$ net force is downward, onto the bottom cup.)
Express as a multiple of the total weight. $W=\rho g V_{sphere}=\rho g\left(\tfrac43\pi R^3\right)$, so
$$\dfrac{F_{top}}{W}=\dfrac{-\pi\rho gR^3/3}{(4/3)\pi\rho gR^3}=-\dfrac14,\qquad \dfrac{F_{bottom}}{W}=\dfrac{5\pi\rho gR^3/3}{(4/3)\pi\rho gR^3}=\dfrac54$$
$$\boxed{F_{top}=\dfrac{W}{4}\ (\text{upward}),\qquad F_{bottom}=\dfrac{5W}{4}\ (\text{downward})}$$
Check: $F_{bottom}-F_{top}=5W/4-W/4=W$ — the net vertical force balances the total weight, as it must for a static fluid. ✓
Quantity
Value
Force on top half, $F_{top}$
$W/4$, directed upward
Force on bottom half, $F_{bottom}$
$5W/4$, directed downward
External pressurization appropriate?
Yes — see discussion below
The top hemisphere is pushed outward and upward with only $W/4$ of net force, and the local gauge pressure falls to zero right at the fill hole — so near the top of the casting, hydrostatic pressure alone gives very little contact pressure holding the metal against the mold wall, risking poor surface conformity, porosity, and a weak as-cast surface finish exactly where gravity is least helpful. Superimposing an external pressure (as in high-pressure die casting) adds a uniform pressure term on top of the hydrostatic profile everywhere in the melt, guaranteeing a healthy minimum contact pressure even at the top of the cavity. This is appropriate and is precisely what external-pressure die casting is used for: it improves mold–metal conformity, reduces shrinkage porosity and gas entrapment, and improves as-cast dimensional fidelity and surface finish — at the cost of higher mold-clamping-force requirements, since the bottom half's force (already $5W/4$ under gravity alone) grows further with the applied pressure.