21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · May 2016
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, May 2016 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Eight questions of 20 marks each (Roman numerals I–VIII); the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All eight are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).
Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only Question VIII (mechanical deformation) is genuinely deformation/mechanical-properties content; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — bonding, crystal structure, crystallographic directions/planes, imperfections, phase diagrams, XRD and diffusion — and is answered as such below.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
The distinguishing features requested — yield point, plastic-strain region, fracture point, UTS — are marked directly on each curve above: (a) has only a fracture point (no yield, no plastic region); (b) has a yield point followed by a flat plastic plateau ending at fracture (no distinct UTS above $\sigma_y$); (c) has both a yield point and a rising UTS/fracture point, with a genuinely sloped (hardening) plastic region between them; (d) has neither a yield point nor a plastic region in the usual sense — it remains elastic (fully recoverable) over very large strains, with strongly increasing tangent stiffness at high strain (entropic straightening of polymer chains).
Given. $d_0=10$ mm, $E=70$ GPa, $\sigma_y=145$ MPa, $\nu=0.33$.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| Original diameter, $d_0$ | 10 mm |
| Cross-sectional area, $A_0=\pi d_0^2/4$ | 78.54 mm² |
| Elastic modulus, $E$ | 70 GPa |
| Yield strength, $\sigma_y$ | 145 MPa |
| Poisson's ratio, $\nu$ | 0.33 |
Approach. Check the stress is below yield (elastic); if so, get the axial strain from Hooke's law and the lateral (diameter) strain from Poisson's ratio.
Approach. Same magnitude of stress, opposite sign; Poisson's effect now bulges the rod outward.
Approach. First check whether 15 kN keeps the rod elastic. Only $E$, $\sigma_y$, and $\nu$ are given — no strain-hardening modulus or full stress–strain curve for 3003-H14 is provided anywhere on this paper (confirmed against the exam's own appendix, which carries only generic constants, not alloy-specific data). That absence is the deliberate content of this sub-question: it is testing the elastic–perfectly-plastic idealisation from part VIII.1(b) directly, where the maximum FORCE the rod can carry in stable equilibrium is capped at $F_{yield}=\sigma_yA_0$ — beyond that, a perfectly-plastic material (zero strain-hardening) cannot generate additional stress to balance additional load, so there is no stable finite-strain equilibrium.
Because an elastic–perfectly-plastic material's stress cannot rise above $\sigma_y$ once yielding begins, the rod cannot statically equilibrate any axial load above $F_{yield}=11.39$ kN: any attempt to apply 15 kN drives the rod into unstable, unbounded plastic flow (necking runs away with no stabilising strain-hardening to arrest it) until fracture — there is no finite, well-defined "plastic strain" value for this load under the stated material model. $\boxed{\text{15 kN exceeds the rod's 11.39 kN plastic collapse load; the rod necks and fractures rather than reaching a stable strained state.}}$ A finite plastic strain at 15 kN could only be computed if a strain-hardening modulus or a full engineering stress–strain curve for 3003-H14 were supplied, which this paper does not provide.
| Quantity | Value |
|---|---|
| (a) Diameter, 6 kN tension | 9.9964 mm |
| (b) Diameter, 6 kN compression | 10.0036 mm |
| Plastic collapse load, $F_{yield}=\sigma_yA_0$ | 11.39 kN |
| (c) 15 kN vs. collapse load | 15 > 11.39 kN — unstable plastic flow to fracture, no finite plastic strain exists |