21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · December 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, December 2017 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Seven questions of 20 marks each (Roman numerals I–VII); the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All seven are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).
Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only parts of Question VI (grain-size strengthening) touch mechanical properties directly; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — electron structure, bonding, crystal structure, crystallographic planes, solid solubility, XRD, diffusion and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Crystal structure | — | FCC |
| Atomic radius | $R$ | 0.125 nm |
| X-ray wavelength (Cu-K$\alpha$) | $\lambda$ | 0.1542 nm |
Find. The lattice parameter $a$, the first three allowed $\{hkl\}$ families, their $d$-spacings, and the corresponding $2\theta$ diffraction-peak positions.
Approach. Get $a$ from the FCC hard-sphere relation, apply the FCC structure-factor reflection rule ($h,k,l$ all odd or all even) to find the first three allowed planes in order of increasing $2\theta$ (decreasing $d$), compute $d_{hkl}$ from the cubic relation, and solve Bragg's law for $2\theta$.
| Plane | $d$ (nm) | $2\theta$ (deg) |
|---|---|---|
| (111) | 0.2041 | 44.38 |
| (200) | 0.1768 | 51.72 |
| (220) | 0.1250 | 76.17 |
In the powder pattern above, every grain orientation is present, so all three allowed families (111), (200), (220) diffract into the detector simultaneously. A single crystal oriented with its (100) plane parallel to the surface, scanned in the usual symmetric $\theta$–$2\theta$ (Bragg–Brentano) reflection geometry, can only diffract from lattice planes that are themselves parallel to the surface — i.e. only the $(h00)$ family. Since $(100)$ itself is forbidden by the FCC reflection rule (mixed parity would not even apply here, but a single unit index is odd — not "all even"), the first allowed reflection from this family is $(200)$, at the same $2\theta_{200}=51.72^{\circ}$ computed above. The (111) and (220) peaks would disappear entirely (those planes are not parallel to the surface in this orientation and cannot satisfy the reflection geometry), leaving essentially a single peak in the scan range considered, at 51.72°, instead of the three-peak powder pattern.
The two structures obey different reflection (structure-factor) rules: FCC reflects only when $h,k,l$ are all odd or all even, giving allowed $\sin^2\theta$ ratios of $3:4:8:11:12:16:19:20\,\ldots$ (from $h^2+k^2+l^2=3,4,8,11,12,\ldots$); BCC reflects only when $h+k+l$ is even, giving ratios $2:4:6:8:10:12:14:16\,\ldots$ (from $h^2+k^2+l^2=2,4,6,8,\ldots$). Practically, a candidate indexes the measured peaks, computes $\sin^2\theta$ for each peak, forms the ratio of each value to the first (smallest), and compares the resulting integer sequence to the two lists above — a $3:4:8$ pattern of successive ratios (as computed for Ni in V.1(a): $3:4:8$ for (111):(200):(220)) identifies FCC, while a $1:2:3$ (i.e. $2:4:6$ normalized) pattern identifies BCC. This structure-factor-driven "systematic absence" is the standard XRD phase-identification method, requiring no prior knowledge of the lattice parameter.