21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · May 2017
Question 7 of 8: Considère's Necking Criterion; Elastic Springback of a Stretched Sheet
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2017 — 12-Mtl-A4, Mechanical Behaviour and Fracture of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved non-communicating calculator. Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric marks only the first five questions as they appear in the answer book. All eight are solved here. This sitting's own printed content is fracture mechanics, fatigue crack growth, creep, toughness, strengthening, composites and plastic instability.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
G. E. Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed. — fracture mechanics and design (Ch. 12), fatigue and crack propagation (Ch. 13), plastic instability/necking (Ch. 3), creep (Ch. 14).
W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed. — stress-strain behaviour, toughness and resilience, strengthening mechanisms, composites, slip systems, ductile-to-brittle transition.
Question 7: Considère's Necking Criterion; Elastic Springback of a Stretched Sheet (20 marks)
(a) Derivation of the Necking Condition $\varepsilon=n$
Given. True stress-true strain hardening law $\sigma=K\varepsilon^n$; the load is $P=\sigma A$; the material deforms at constant volume, $A_0L_0=AL$.
Find. Show that the maximum-load (necking-onset) condition occurs at $\varepsilon=n$.
Approach. Necking begins where the load $P$ reaches a maximum, $dP=0$ (beyond this point, the shrinking cross-section reduces the load faster than strain hardening can raise the stress, so deformation localises). Express $P$ in terms of true strain alone, using constant volume, and set $dP/d\varepsilon=0$.
Load in terms of true strain. Constant volume gives $A=A_0e^{-\varepsilon}$ (true strain $\varepsilon=\ln(L/L_0)$), so
$$P=\sigma A=\sigma A_0e^{-\varepsilon}$$
Substitute the power-law hardening rule. With $\sigma=K\varepsilon^n$, $\dfrac{d\sigma}{d\varepsilon}=nK\varepsilon^{n-1}$. Setting $d\sigma/d\varepsilon=\sigma$:
$$nK\varepsilon^{n-1}=K\varepsilon^n\;\Rightarrow\;n=\varepsilon\;\Rightarrow\;\boxed{\varepsilon=n}$$
Necking (plastic instability) begins exactly when the true strain equals the strain-hardening exponent — a higher-$n$ material can be drawn to a larger uniform strain before it necks.
(b) Pre-Release Length for a 6.2 m Permanent Length
Given.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Original (undeformed) length
$L_0$
5 m
Desired final (permanent, after release) length
$L_f$
6.2 m
Elastic modulus
$E$
65 GPa
Yield strength
$\sigma_y$
200 MPa
Find. The length of the sheet while still under load, immediately before the stress is released, so that the sheet's permanent length afterward is 6.2 m.
Check
No strain-hardening data ($K$, $n$, or a full stress-strain curve) is supplied for the magnesium sheet in this question — only $E$ and $\sigma_y$. The sheet is therefore idealised as elastic–perfectly-plastic: once yielded, the flow stress stays at $\sigma_y$ for any further plastic strain, so the elastic strain recovered on unloading is fixed at $\sigma_y/E$ regardless of how far the sheet was stretched.
Approach. On release, only the elastic portion of the strain recovers instantly (Hooke's law); the elastic-perfectly-plastic idealisation fixes the recoverable strain at $\sigma_y/E$. Add that recovery (referenced to the original 5 m gauge length, consistent with ordinary engineering strain) back onto the desired 6.2 m permanent length to find the loaded length just before release.
Elastic strain recovered on unloading.
$$\varepsilon_{el}=\frac{\sigma_y}{E}=\frac{200}{65{,}000}=\boxed{0.003077\ (0.308\%)}$$
Length required immediately before release.
$$L_1=L_f+\Delta L_{el}=6.200+0.0154=\boxed{6.215\ \text{m}}$$
(check: yield strain $\sigma_y/E=0.31\%$ is far smaller than the $\approx24\%$ total engineering strain reached, confirming the sheet is deep into the plastic regime, where the perfectly-plastic idealisation is the reasonable approximation the given data supports.)