21-Mat-A4 Deformation Behaviour and Properties of Materials · December 2019
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. National Exams, December 2019 — 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Three hours, closed book, one approved calculator (Casio or Sharp). Seven questions of 20 marks each; the rubric asks for any five, with only the first five in the answer book marked. All seven are solved here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. All necessary equations, constants and an error-function table are provided in the exam's own appendix (reproduced where used below).
Note on the exam title. The printed exam header reads 10-Met-A4, Structure of Materials. Only Question 6 (dislocations, slip, resolved shear stress) touches mechanical/deformation properties directly; the paper as a whole is a broad introductory materials-science survey — atomic structure, bonding, crystal structure/directions/planes, point defects, XRD, dislocations and phase diagrams — and is answered as such below.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
[Figure not reproduced: Cu–Ag eutectic phase diagram (as printed on the exam), with the digitized 800°C tie line ($C_\alpha\approx7.5$, $C_L\approx67.0$ wt% Ag) and 700°C solvus readings ($4.6$, $94.4$ wt% Ag) overlaid in red. See the official exam paper.]
Check: the printed labels give the eutectic point exactly ($T_E=779\,{}^{\circ}$C, $C_{\alpha,E}=8.0$, $C_E=71.9$, $C_{\beta,E}=91.2$ wt% Ag), but the 800°C and 700°C boundary compositions used below are read directly off this paper's own diagram (calibrated against its printed axis ticks and the labelled eutectic point, then cross-checked against the true Cu–Ag system, which this diagram reproduces exactly). Treat $C_\alpha(800)\approx7.5$, $C_L(800)\approx67.0$, and the two 700°C solvus readings as diagram-scale approximations (±1–2 wt%), not exact values.
Approach. Locate the 800°C isotherm; the alloy's overall composition (60 wt% Ag) is compared against the $\alpha$/($\alpha$+L) and ($\alpha$+L)/L boundary compositions at that temperature.
At 800°C the $\alpha$-phase (solidus) boundary reads $C_\alpha\approx7.5$ wt% Ag and the liquidus boundary reads $C_L\approx67.0$ wt% Ag. Since $C_\alpha \lt 60 \lt C_L$, the alloy sits inside the two-phase $\alpha+L$ field:
| Phase | Composition |
|---|---|
| $\alpha$ (solid solution) | $\approx7.5$ wt% Ag ($92.5$ wt% Cu) |
| $L$ (liquid) | $\approx67.0$ wt% Ag ($33.0$ wt% Cu) |
Reading the two solvus branches at 700°C directly off the diagram:
Both solubilities are well below their eutectic-temperature maxima (8.0 and 8.8 wt%, respectively, at 779°C) — solid solubility falls as temperature drops, which is exactly the mechanism (retrograde solvus) that enables age/precipitation hardening in this and analogous alloy systems.
A eutectic reaction is the isothermal, invariant transformation of a liquid of one fixed composition directly into two distinct solid phases of two other fixed compositions, on cooling through the eutectic temperature: $L\rightleftharpoons\alpha+\beta$. For the Cu–Ag system: $$L(71.9\ \text{wt\%\,Ag})\ \xrightarrow[\text{cooling}]{779\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}}\ \alpha(8.0\ \text{wt\%\,Ag}) + \beta(91.2\ \text{wt\%\,Ag})$$
Given. $C_0=55$ wt% Ag; tie line at 800°C from 7.1: $C_\alpha=7.5$, $C_L=67.0$ wt% Ag.
Find. Mass fraction of each phase.
Approach. Lever rule: each phase's fraction is the ratio of the "opposite" tie-line segment to the total tie-line length.
Approach. Trace the vertical composition line at 20 wt% Ag down through the diagram: liquid $\to$ liquidus (primary-$\alpha$ nucleation) $\to$ eutectic isotherm (remaining liquid transforms) $\to$ solvus (secondary $\beta$ precipitation on further cooling).
At 1100°C the alloy is fully liquid ($1100\,{}^{\circ}\text{C}$ exceeds the liquidus temperature at 20 wt% Ag, which lies below Cu's own melting point of 1085°C). Cooling through the liquidus, primary (proeutectic) $\alpha$ dendrites nucleate and grow, rejecting Ag into the shrinking liquid, whose composition follows the liquidus toward the eutectic point. Because the bulk composition (20 wt% Ag) exceeds the maximum solid solubility at the eutectic temperature (8.0 wt% Ag), the liquid is not exhausted before reaching 779°C: just below the eutectic isotherm, the remaining liquid (now at 71.9 wt% Ag) transforms by the eutectic reaction into a fine lamellar mixture of $\alpha+\beta$, surrounding the pre-existing primary $\alpha$ grains. By the lever rule at $T_E^-$, the microconstituent fractions are $$f_{\text{primary }\alpha}=\frac{C_E-C_0}{C_E-C_{\alpha,E}}=\frac{71.9-20}{71.9-8.0}=\boxed{0.812\ (81.2\%)}\qquad f_{\text{eutectic}}=\boxed{0.188\ (18.8\%)}$$ On further cooling toward room temperature, the $\alpha$-solvus falls steeply (7.2 above), so both the primary $\alpha$ grains and the $\alpha$ lamellae within the eutectic mixture reject additional Ag by solid-state diffusion, precipitating fine secondary $\beta$ particles ($\beta_{II}$) throughout the primary $\alpha$. The room-temperature microstructure is therefore: primary $\alpha$ (with dispersed $\beta_{II}$ precipitates) + the eutectic $(\alpha+\beta)$ constituent, exactly the pattern sketched above.
| Item | Result |
|---|---|
| 7.1 Phases, 60% Ag @ 800°C | $\alpha$ (7.5% Ag) + L (67.0% Ag) |
| 7.2(a) Max Cu in Ag @ 700°C | $\approx5.6$ wt% Cu |
| 7.2(b) Max Ag in Cu @ 700°C | $\approx4.6$ wt% Ag |
| 7.3 Eutectic reaction | $L(71.9)\to\alpha(8.0)+\beta(91.2)$ @ 779°C |
| 7.4 $f_\alpha$ / $f_L$ (55% Ag @ 800°C) | $0.202$ / $0.798$ |
| 7.5 $f_{\text{primary }\alpha}$ / $f_{\text{eutectic}}$ (20% Ag, $T_E^-$) | $0.812$ / $0.188$ |