21-Mat-A5 Phase Transformations and Thermal Treatment · December 2018
Question 1 of 8: The Fe–C Phase Diagram and Microstructural Design
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2018 — 12-Mtl-A5, Phase Transformations of Metals, Glasses and Ceramics. Three hours, closed book, approved Casio or Sharp calculator only. Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric states that five questions constitute a complete paper and only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. All eight are answered here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. Several sub-parts explicitly call for an essay-format answer, and the rubric rewards clarity and organisation, so those answers are written as structured prose with supporting sketches rather than as note form.
Note on the exam code
This December 2018 sitting's printed header reads 12-Mtl-A5, Phase Transformations of Metals, Glasses and Ceramics, covering the Fe-C phase diagram and microstructural design, precipitate solubility, precipitation hardening and spinodal decomposition, interfaces and precipitate-free zones, grain growth and Zener pinning, nucleation mechanisms, classical nucleation theory and constitutional supercooling, and glass and glass-ceramic processing.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
D. A. Porter, K. E. Easterling and M. Y. Sherif, Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys, 3rd ed. — nucleation and growth theory (Ch. 4), precipitation hardening and spinodal decomposition (Ch. 5), solidification (Ch. 4), recrystallization and grain growth (Ch. 3).
W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed. — the Fe-Fe₃C phase diagram and microstructural development (Ch. 9–10), glasses and glass-ceramics (Ch. 12–13).
R. E. Reed-Hill and R. Abbaschian, Physical Metallurgy Principles, 4th ed. — binary phase diagrams and the lever rule, ordering and superlattices, nucleation kinetics.
F. C. Campbell (ed.), Phase Diagrams: Understanding the Basics, ASM International — precipitation sequences, coherent/semi-coherent/incoherent interfaces.
ASM Handbook, Vol. 4 (Heat Treating) and Vol. 9 (Metallography and Microstructures) — microconstituent identification and heat-treatment practice.
J. E. Shelby, Introduction to Glass Science and Technology, 2nd ed. — glass transition, glass-ceramic nucleation and crystallization schedules.
Question 1: The Fe–C Phase Diagram and Microstructural Design (20 marks)
1.1 — (a) Phases and compositions at 1200°C for Fe-3.0 wt%C
Given. An Fe-3.0 wt%C liquid is slowly (equilibrium) cooled from 1600°C to 1200°C. The attached diagram is a Callister-style partial Fe-Fe₃C diagram; the γ+L two-phase field is bounded on the eutectic side by the invariant point at 4.30 wt%C, 1148°C.
Find. The phase(s) present at 1200°C and their compositions.
[Figure not reproduced. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Locate C₀=3.0 on the 1200°C isotherm, identify the field it falls in from the diagram, then apply the lever rule to the tie line bounding that field.
Locate the field. At 1200°C the two boundaries of the γ+L field are the γ-solidus (left) and the liquidus (right). From the digitized figure these read Cγ≈1.85 wt%C and CL≈3.86 wt%C at 1200°C. Since $1.85 \lt 3.0 \lt 3.86$, the alloy at 1200°C sits inside the γ + L two-phase field.
Apply the lever rule. With the tie line endpoints Cγ=1.85 and CL=3.86:
$$W_L=\dfrac{C_0-C_\gamma}{C_L-C_\gamma}=\dfrac{3.0-1.85}{3.86-1.85}=\boxed{0.57}\qquad W_\gamma=1-W_L=\boxed{0.43}$$
Final results — Fe-3.0 wt%C at 1200°C
Quantity
Value
Phases present
γ (austenite) + L (liquid)
Composition of γ
≈ 1.85 wt% C
Composition of L
≈ 3.86 wt% C
Mass fraction liquid, $W_L$
≈ 0.57 (57%)
Mass fraction austenite, $W_\gamma$
≈ 0.43 (43%)
Check: the γ-solidus and liquidus compositions at 1200°C are not printed values on the attached diagram (only the invariant points 2.11/4.30 at 1148°C and 0.022/0.77 at 727°C are labelled); they were read from the printed figure and carry a reading uncertainty of roughly ±0.05 wt%C, which moves $W_L$ only within about 0.55–0.60. (A straight line between the printed peritectic and eutectic corners of the solidus gives Cγ≈1.82, consistent with the 1.85 read from the figure.)
1.2 — (b) Full transformation sequence, Fe-1.5 wt%C, 1600→400°C
Fe-1.5 wt%C lies between the eutectoid (0.77) and the maximum γ solubility (2.11), so it is a hypereutectoid steel. Cooled slowly (equilibrium) from 1600°C, it passes through five distinct microstructural regimes before reaching room temperature:
Microstructural evolution of Fe-1.5 wt%C on slow cooling from 1600°C to below 727°C.
1600→≈1435°C — single-phase liquid, L. The alloy is entirely liquid; no solid phase is present. As the liquidus is approached, compositional undercooling is negligible under slow cooling and solidification begins by heterogeneous nucleation of γ dendrites at the liquidus temperature for 1.5 wt%C (the digitized liquidus crosses 1.5 wt%C at ≈1435°C).
≈1435→≈1265°C (liquidus to γ-solidus at 1.5 wt%C) — γ + L. Primary γ (austenite) dendrites nucleate and grow, rejecting carbon into the shrinking liquid pool (the liquid composition rises along the liquidus toward 4.30 wt%C while the solid composition rises along the γ-solidus toward 2.11 wt%C, per the lever rule at each temperature). The two-phase mixture consists of coring dendrites of γ surrounded by carbon-enriched liquid.
≈1265→≈995°C — single-phase γ, austenite. Once the alloy crosses the γ-solidus (interpolated at 1.5 wt%C), solidification is complete and the microstructure is 100% γ grains (FCC), homogenizing by solid-state diffusion as cooling continues; the microstructure is a normal polygonal austenite grain structure with no second phase.
≈995→727°C — γ + Fe₃C (proeutectoid cementite). Below ≈995°C, where the 1.5 wt%C vertical crosses the Acm (γ/γ+Fe₃C) solvus, the alloy enters the γ+Fe₃C two-phase field (since 1.5>0.77, the alloy is on the hypereutectoid side and the FIRST solid to form on further cooling is proeutectoid cementite, not proeutectoid ferrite). Fe₃C nucleates preferentially at γ grain boundaries (highest-energy, easiest-diffusion sites) and grows as a thin, continuous network outlining the prior austenite grains, while the remaining γ loses carbon and its composition slides down the γ-solvus toward 0.77 wt%C as 727°C is approached.
At 727°C — eutectoid reaction. The remaining austenite, now at exactly the eutectoid composition (0.77 wt%C), transforms isothermally: $\gamma(0.77\%\text{C})\rightarrow\alpha(0.022\%\text{C})+\text{Fe}_3\text{C}(6.70\%\text{C})$, nucleating cooperatively as alternating lamellae of ferrite and cementite — pearlite.
727→400°C — α + Fe₃C, final microstructure. Below 727°C no further phase change occurs (only a very small further drop in the α solubility limit, from 0.022 toward ≈0.005 wt%C, which is usually neglected). The room-temperature microstructure is pearlite colonies (lamellar α+Fe₃C) set inside a continuous proeutectoid cementite network that decorates the prior austenite grain boundaries — the classic, brittle hypereutectoid microstructure (Question 1(c) below quantifies why the cementite network content matters for toughness).
Check: the liquidus (≈1435°C), γ-solidus (≈1265°C) and Acm solvus (≈995°C) temperatures at 1.5 wt%C are not printed on the diagram; they were digitized from the attached figure and are good to roughly ±10°C. The 727°C eutectoid is printed. The printed 912°C is the α/γ transformation of pure iron and plays no part in the cooling path of this hypereutectoid alloy.
1.3 — (c) Critical hypereutectoid composition for <10 wt% total cementite
Given. At room temperature the two-phase field for any Fe-C alloy above 0.022 wt%C is α+Fe₃C, bounded by Cα≈0.022 wt%C and CFe₃C=6.70 wt%C (fixed stoichiometric compound). The total cementite (proeutectoid + eutectoid, i.e. all of the Fe₃C in the microstructure) obeys the ordinary lever rule across this whole field.
Find. The composition C₀ at which total cementite = 10 wt%, and whether it is genuinely attainable on the hypereutectoid side.
Approach. Apply the room-temperature lever rule for total Fe₃C as a function of C₀, set it equal to 0.10, and solve for C₀; then compare the result against the eutectoid composition to check the hypereutectoid constraint is even satisfiable.
Total-cementite lever rule.
$$W_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C}}(C_0)=\dfrac{C_0-C_\alpha}{C_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C}}-C_\alpha}=\dfrac{C_0-0.022}{6.70-0.022}$$
Solve for the critical composition. Setting $W_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C}}=0.10$:
$$C_0=C_\alpha+0.10\,(C_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C}}-C_\alpha)=0.022+0.10(6.678)=\boxed{0.690\ \text{wt\%C}}$$
Check against the eutectoid. Evaluate the same lever rule AT the eutectoid composition itself (pure pearlite, no proeutectoid phase at all):
$$W_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C}}(0.77)=\dfrac{0.77-0.022}{6.678}=\boxed{0.112\ (11.2\%)}$$
Since $0.690 \lt 0.77$, the critical composition found in Step 2 is below the eutectoid — it is a hypoeutectoid, not a hypereutectoid, composition.
Alternative reading: limit the proeutectoid cementite network. In practice the embrittling constituent of a hypereutectoid steel is the continuous grain-boundary network of proeutectoid Fe₃C. If the 10% is read as applying to that constituent, the lever rule is taken just above 727°C between the eutectoid and cementite:
$$W_{\text{Fe}_3\text{C,pro}}=\dfrac{C_0-0.77}{6.70-0.77}=0.10\ \Longrightarrow\ C_0=0.77+0.10(5.93)=\boxed{1.36\ \text{wt\%C}}$$
so hypereutectoid steels with 0.77 < C₀ < 1.36 wt%C would qualify. The question's own wording (“total of the cementite phase”) supports the first reading, so that remains the primary answer; state the interpretation adopted, as Note 1 of the paper invites.
Final results — critical composition for 10% total cementite
Quantity
Value
Composition giving exactly 10 wt% total Fe₃C
0.690 wt% C
Total Fe₃C in pure pearlite (eutectoid, 0.77 wt%C)
11.2 wt%
Any hypereutectoid alloy ($C_0>0.77$) satisfies $<10$ wt% Fe₃C?
No — never
Critical C₀ if only proeutectoid Fe₃C is limited to 10%