21-Mat-A7 Environmental Degradation of Materials · May 2018
Question 1 of 8: Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Thermodynamics
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2018 — 10-Met-A7, Corrosion and Oxidation. Three hours, open book, approved Casio/Sharp calculator only. Eight questions of 20 marks each; the rubric states that the first five questions as they appear in the answer book constitute a complete paper (100 marks). All eight are answered here, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script. The rubric also flags that answers take one of three forms — essay, calculation, or a comparison table — and marks clarity and organisation accordingly.
Reference texts. The answers below are keyed to the works normally recommended for this syllabus code:
M. G. Fontana, Corrosion Engineering, 3rd ed. — electrochemical corrosion theory, polarization and passivity (Ch. 6), forms of corrosion: galvanic, crevice, pitting, intergranular, stress corrosion cracking (Ch. 3), cathodic and anodic protection (Ch. 4–9).
D. A. Jones, Principles and Prevention of Corrosion, 2nd ed. — thermodynamics and the Nernst equation (Ch. 2–3), mixed-potential and kinetics/polarization diagrams (Ch. 4), passivity (Ch. 6), environmental cracking (Ch. 10–11), coatings and cathodic protection (Ch. 13–14).
W. D. Callister and D. G. Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed. — corrosion and degradation of materials, incl. degradation of polymers (Ch. 17).
ASM Handbook, Vol. 13A (Corrosion: Fundamentals, Testing, and Protection) — Pilling–Bedworth ratio and high-temperature oxidation, forms of corrosion, cathodic protection practice.
Question 1: Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Thermodynamics (20 marks)
Given. Standard thermodynamic data at 298 K for every species in the balanced cell reaction $CH_3OH + \tfrac32 O_2 \rightarrow CO_2 + 2H_2O$ (6 mol e$^-$ transferred, from the anode half-reaction).
Given data — standard enthalpies and entropies of formation
Species
$\Delta H_f^\circ$ (kJ/mol)
$S^\circ$ (J/mol·K)
$CH_3OH(l)$
−245.98
239.83
$O_2(g)$
0
205.14
$CO_2(g)$
−393.51
213.80
$H_2O(l)$
−285.83
69.95
Find. $\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ$, $\Delta S_{rxn}^\circ$, $\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ$, and the standard cell potential $E_{cell}^\circ$.
Approach. Take products − reactants (weighted by stoichiometric coefficients) for $\Delta H^\circ$ and $\Delta S^\circ$, combine them via $\Delta G^\circ=\Delta H^\circ-T\Delta S^\circ$ at $T=298$ K, then convert to a cell potential with $\Delta G^\circ=-nFE_{cell}^\circ$ using the $n=6$ electrons the anode reaction transfers.
(a) Overall enthalpy.
$$\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ = \big[\Delta H_f^\circ(CO_2) + 2\,\Delta H_f^\circ(H_2O)\big] - \big[\Delta H_f^\circ(CH_3OH) + \tfrac32\,\Delta H_f^\circ(O_2)\big]$$
$$\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ = \big[-393.51 + 2(-285.83)\big] - \big[-245.98 + \tfrac32(0)\big] = -965.17-(-245.98)$$
$$\boxed{\Delta H_{rxn}^\circ \approx -719.19\ \text{kJ/mol}}$$
Both product terms (the $CO_2$ and the doubled $H_2O$) are strongly exothermic, and methanol's own formation enthalpy is comparatively small, so the reaction is strongly exothermic overall — expected for a fuel oxidation.
(b) Overall entropy. The same products − reactants combination applied to $S^\circ$:
$$\Delta S_{rxn}^\circ = \big[S^\circ(CO_2)+2\,S^\circ(H_2O)\big]-\big[S^\circ(CH_3OH)+\tfrac32\,S^\circ(O_2)\big]$$
$$\Delta S_{rxn}^\circ = \big[213.80+2(69.95)\big]-\big[239.83+\tfrac32(205.14)\big] = 353.70-547.54$$
$$\boxed{\Delta S_{rxn}^\circ \approx -193.84\ \text{J/mol}\cdot\text{K}}$$
The entropy falls because 2.5 mol of gas ($O_2$) on the reactant side condenses into liquid products with no compensating increase in moles of gas — a net loss of gas-phase disorder.
(c) Overall free energy. Using $\Delta G^\circ=\Delta H^\circ-T\Delta S^\circ$ at $T=298$ K:
$$\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ = -719.19\ \text{kJ/mol} - (298\ \text{K})(-0.19384\ \text{kJ/mol}\cdot\text{K}) = -719.19+57.78$$
$$\boxed{\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ \approx -661.4\ \text{kJ/mol}}$$
The unfavourable (negative) entropy change makes the reaction slightly less favourable than $\Delta H^\circ$ alone suggests, but the enthalpy term dominates by more than an order of magnitude, so the reaction remains strongly spontaneous.
(d) Standard cell potential. The anode half-reaction shows $n=6$ electrons transferred per mole of methanol oxidised, so
$$E_{cell}^\circ = \frac{-\Delta G_{rxn}^\circ}{nF} = \frac{661\,426\ \text{J/mol}}{(6)(96\,486.7\ \text{C/mol})}$$
$$\boxed{E_{cell}^\circ \approx +1.14\ \text{V}}$$