NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A1 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer · Undated paper

Question 7 of 8: Power-amplifier case temperature (free convection + radiation)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: National Examination 16-Mec-A1 Applied Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer — 3 hours, open book. Two parts: Part A (Thermodynamics, Q1–Q4) and Part B (Heat Transfer, Q5–Q8). The rubric asks for five questions (three from one part, two from the other), each of equal value; all eight are solved.

Reference texts: Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach (9th ed.); Çengel & Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer (6th ed.); Incropera & DeWitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (8th ed.); Moran & Shapiro, Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics. Property data: saturated ammonia and R-134a tables printed with the paper.

Question 7 — Power-amplifier case temperature (free convection + radiation) (Part B, equal value)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Plate height (vertical) / width$H,\,w$40 mm / 50 mm
Radiating / convecting area (2 faces)$A$$2(0.04\times0.05)=0.0040$ m²
Ambient air / surroundings$T_\infty$25 °C = 298.15 K
Emissivity$\varepsilon$0.82
Dissipation$\dot Q$7 W

Find. the steady surface temperature $T_s$.

Vertical plate — energy balance plate 40 mm high 7 W convection h·A·ΔT radiation εσA(Tₛ⁴−T∞⁴) still air, 25 °C
Steady state: internal dissipation is removed jointly by free convection and surface radiation.

Approach. Set the generated power equal to the combined convective and radiative loss, with the convection coefficient from the Churchill–Chu vertical-plate correlation evaluated at the film temperature; solve the resulting nonlinear balance for $T_s$.

  1. Energy balance. At steady state $$\dot Q=h\,A\,(T_s-T_\infty)+\varepsilon\sigma A\,(T_s^4-T_\infty^4)$$ with $h$ from the Churchill–Chu correlation $Nu=\Big[0.825+\dfrac{0.387\,Ra_L^{1/6}}{(1+(0.492/Pr)^{9/16})^{8/27}}\Big]^2$, $Ra_L=\dfrac{g\beta(T_s-T_\infty)L^3}{\nu\alpha}$, $L=H=0.04$ m, properties at the film temperature.
  2. Iterate on $T_s$. Solving the balance numerically converges to $$T_s=\boxed{127\ ^\circ\text{C}\ (400\ \text{K})}$$ at which $Ra_L=3.0\times10^{5}$ and $h=9.1$ W/m²·K.
  3. Check the split. The two loss paths are comparable at this temperature: $$\dot Q_\text{conv}=hA(T_s-T_\infty)=9.1(0.004)(102)=3.70\ \text{W},\qquad \dot Q_\text{rad}=\varepsilon\sigma A(T_s^4-T_\infty^4)=3.30\ \text{W}$$ summing to 7.0 W — radiation is not negligible here (47 %) because the high anodized emissivity and the elevated surface temperature both favour it.
QuantityResult
Convection coefficient $h$9.1 W/m²·K
Convective / radiative loss3.70 / 3.30 W
Steady case temperature $T_s$≈ 127 °C
Check — two-face assumption.
The case is modelled as radiating and convecting from both 40×50 mm faces ($A=0.0040$ m²); if only one face were exposed the balance would drive $T_s$ higher. The high computed temperature (127 °C) confirms that a bare 7 W amplifier this small runs hot — a heat sink would be specified in practice.