22-Mec-A2 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines · May 2013
Question 5 of 6: Rolling-Disk Impact & Damped Free Vibration
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper: National Examinations — 07-Mec-A2 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines, May 2013. Open-book, 3-hour paper; answer FIVE of six questions, all of equal value (20 marks). Part A (mechanisms & machine dynamics, Q1–Q4) and Part B (mechanical vibration, Q5–Q6). All six questions are solved here.
Reference texts: R. L. Norton, Design of Machinery (6th ed., McGraw-Hill) — velocity analysis, cams, gear trains, engine dynamics; C. E. Wilson & J. P. Sadler, Kinematics and Dynamics of Machinery (3rd ed.); S. S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations (6th ed., Pearson) — Part B; J. E. Shigley, Mechanical Engineering Design — gear geometry.
Note on the figure-based questions. Q1 (press) is a scaled graphical problem (“Scale 1:15”); its link geometry is read from the printed diagram, so the mechanical advantage carries a graphical tolerance of roughly ±5 %. Q3 (planetary box) is solved from the kinematic topology inferred from the sectioned schematic. Both interpretations are stated explicitly in a check callout so the reader can re-scale from the original drawing.
Given. Spring–mass–damper: $m=10\ \text{kg}$, $k=3000\ \text{N/m}$, $c=300\ \text{N}\cdot ext{s/m}$, at rest. Rolling disk: $m_1=5\ \text{kg}$, $R=0.5\ \text{m}$, $\omega_d=10\ \text{rad/s}$; sticks (plastic impact); friction ignored after impact.
Find. $x(t)$ of the combined system after impact.
Fig. 5 — the spring-mass-damper struck by the rolling disk (left), and the resulting damped free response x(t) with its decaying envelope (right).
Approach. Get the disk’s translational speed from the rolling condition, apply linear-momentum conservation for the plastic impact to obtain the post-impact velocity, then solve the standard underdamped free-vibration initial-value problem for the combined mass.
Disk speed (rolling without slip). $v_1=\omega_d R=10(0.5)=5\ \text{m/s}$.
Plastic impact — linear momentum. With no impulsive ground friction, the disk’s spin decouples and only translation couples to the block:
$$m_1 v_1=(m+m_1)V_0\ \Rightarrow\ V_0=\frac{5(5)}{15}=1.667\ \text{m/s}.$$
The vibrating mass is $M=m+m_1=15\ \text{kg}$.
Natural frequency and damping.
$$\omega_n=\sqrt{k/M}=\sqrt{3000/15}=14.14\ \text{rad/s},\quad \zeta=\frac{c}{2\sqrt{kM}}=\frac{300}{424.3}=0.707.$$
Initial conditions & response. $x(0)=0$, $\dot x(0)=V_0$. For $x=e^{-\zeta\omega_n t}(A\cos\omega_d^* t+B\sin\omega_d^* t)$: $A=0$, $B=V_0/\omega_d^*=0.1667\ \text{m}$, and $\zeta\omega_n=10\ \text{s}^{-1}$:
$$\boxed{x(t)=0.167\,e^{-10t}\sin(10t)\ \text{m}.}$$
Quantity
Value
Disk approach speed
5 m/s
Post-impact velocity $V_0$
1.667 m/s
$\omega_n$ / $\zeta$ / $\omega_d^{*}$
14.14 rad/s / 0.707 / 10 rad/s
Damped free motion
x(t) = 0.167 e−10t sin(10t) m
Check: the impact uses linear-momentum conservation, assuming the ground friction impulse during the very short contact is negligible so the disk’s rotational kinetic energy stays in its (now free) spin. If instead the rolling constraint is enforced through the impact, use angular momentum about the contact and the answer for $V_0$ changes.