Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format: EGBC National Exam, 22-Mec-A2 “Kinematics and Dynamics of Machines”, May 2015 (source code 07-Mec-A2). Open-book, 3 hours; six questions of equal value (20 marks each), candidates answer any five. Part A — mechanisms and machine dynamics (Q1–Q4); Part B — mechanical vibration (Q5–Q6). All six are solved in full below.
Reference texts: R. L. Norton, Design of Machinery, 5th ed. (instant centres & mechanical advantage, cam design, four-bar force balancing, epicyclic trains); S. S. Rao, Mechanical Vibrations, 6th ed. (multi-DOF free vibration, modal analysis, impact response); J. E. Shigley & C. R. Mischke, Mechanical Engineering Design (epicyclic train-value cross-check).
Find. the motion program that minimizes peak acceleration; its $s,v,a,j$ for rise and fall; $a_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $j_{\mathrm{max}}$ on the rise; a base circle; and the pressure angles at 75° and 270°.
Approach. For a rise–dwell–fall (double-dwell) cam the acceleration must start and end at zero at every dwell edge; among such programs the modified-trapezoidal acceleration curve gives the lowest peak acceleration, so it is the correct choice for the stated objective. Build its $s,v,a,j$, scale to the lift, extract the peaks, size the base circle from the radius-of-curvature limit, and evaluate the flat-faced pressure angle.
Using the normalized cam angle $\xi = \theta/\beta \in [0,1]$, the modified-trapezoidal acceleration is a symmetric block with sinusoidal ramps (an eighth of the interval each) so that both $a$ and $j$ stay finite and $a=0$ at the ends. Writing the follower as $s = h\,S(\xi)$, its derivatives with respect to real time follow from $v = h\,\omega\,S'/\beta$, $a = h\,\omega^{2}S''/\beta^{2}$, $j = h\,\omega^{3}S'''/\beta^{3}$, where primes are $d/d\xi$. Integrating the standard shape gives the dimensionless peak factors
so that $a_{\mathrm{max}} = C_a\,h\,\omega^2/\beta^2$, $v_{\mathrm{max}} = C_v\,h\,\omega/\beta$, $j_{\mathrm{max}} = C_j\,h\,\omega^3/\beta^3$. (For comparison the constant-acceleration “parabolic” curve reaches only $C_a=4.0$ but with infinite jerk, and the popular cycloidal curve has $C_a=6.28$; the modified trapezoid is the lowest-peak-acceleration program with bounded jerk.)
Modified-trapezoidal rise (0–150°): displacement $s$, velocity $v$, acceleration $a$ (the trapezoid), and jerk $j$ (finite, four sinusoidal pulses). Vertical scales normalized.
Rise equations (0 ≤ θ ≤ 150°). With $\xi=\theta/\beta_1$, the follower is $s=h\,S(\xi)$ where $S(\xi)$ is the double integral of the normalized modified-trapezoid acceleration; $v,a,j$ scale as above. The acceleration block is $$a(\xi)=C_a\frac{h\omega^2}{\beta_1^2}\,b(\xi),\quad b(\xi)=\begin{cases}\sin(4\pi\xi)&0\le\xi<\tfrac18\\[2pt]1&\tfrac18\le\xi<\tfrac38\\[2pt]\sin\!\big(4\pi(\xi-\tfrac14)\big)&\tfrac38\le\xi<\tfrac12\\[2pt]\text{(mirror, negative)}&\tfrac12\le\xi\le1\end{cases}$$ with $v$ and $s$ obtained by successive integration subject to $s(0)=0,\ s(1)=h,\ v(0)=v(1)=0$.
Fall equations (180° ≤ θ ≤ 360°). Identical functional form with $\xi=(\theta-180^\circ)/\beta_2$ and the displacement inverted, $s = h\,[1-S(\xi)]$; the sign of $a$ reverses. Because $\beta_2=180^\circ>\beta_1$, the fall is gentler: $$a_{\mathrm{max,fall}} = C_a\frac{h\,\omega^2}{\beta_2^2} = 55.9\ \text{m/s}^2.$$ The rise therefore governs the peak acceleration of the cam.
Base circle (flat-faced follower). The follower contact radius is $\rho = R_0 + s + s''$ (with $s''=d^2s/d\theta^2$ in length units); a cusp is avoided when $\rho>0$ everywhere. Over the full cycle $\min(s+s'') \approx 0$, so any positive base radius satisfies the curvature limit; for a practical, robust cam choose $$\boxed{R_0 = 25\ \text{mm}}$$ (giving $\rho_{\min}\approx 25$ mm). The flat face must be wide enough for the contact offset $s'$: required half-width $= \max|s'| = C_v h/\beta_1 = 9.7\ \text{mm}$, so a face of $\gtrsim 22\ \text{mm}$ (with margin).
Pressure angles at 75° and 270°. For a flat-faced follower the contact normal is always perpendicular to the flat face — i.e. always parallel to the follower axis — so the pressure angle is identically zero at every cam angle: $$\phi(75^\circ)=0^\circ,\qquad \phi(270^\circ)=0^\circ.$$ Because the pressure angle can never exceed its limit, no pressure-angle iteration on the base circle is required; the base-circle size for a flat-faced follower is set instead by the radius-of-curvature (cusp) condition of step 4, not by pressure angle.