Question 5 of 6: Root locus and the gain for $\zeta=0.5$
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper: National Exams — May 2013 · 07-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Controls · 3 hours · closed book (Casio/Sharp calculator + semi-log graph paper only) · any four of six questions constitute a complete paper; all questions of equal value. All six questions are solved here as a study resource.
Reference texts (subject). K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed. (root locus Ch. 6, frequency response/Bode Ch. 7, steady-state error §5.8, Routh–Hurwitz §5.6); N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 8th ed.; R. C. Dorf & R. H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems, 13th ed.; G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell & A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 7th ed. Laplace-transform pairs are supplied with the exam.
Question 5: Root locus and the gain for $\zeta=0.5$ (equal value)
Open-loop poles at $0,\,-1,\,-2$; no finite zeros.
Find. the root-locus diagram, and the value of $K$ giving the dominant complex pole pair a damping ratio $\zeta=0.5$.
Root locus of $K/[s(s+1)(s+2)]$. Three branches leave the poles at $0,-1,-2$ (×); two break away at $\sigma=-0.423$ and follow the $60^\circ$ asymptotes (centroid $-1$), crossing the $j\omega$ axis at $\pm j\sqrt2$ when $K=6$. The dashed ray is the $\zeta=0.5$ line; the design points ($\circ$) at $-\tfrac13\pm j0.577$ correspond to $K=1.04$.
Approach. Sketch the locus from its rules (real-axis segments, asymptotes, breakaway, $j\omega$ crossing), then impose the $\zeta=0.5$ geometry on the characteristic cubic and solve for the pole locations and $K$.
Locus skeleton. With $n=3$ poles and $m=0$ zeros there are three branches to infinity. The real-axis locus lies where an odd number of real poles/zeros sit to the right: on $[-1,0]$ and $(-\infty,-2]$. The three asymptotes have
$$\text{centroid }\sigma_a=\frac{0-1-2}{3}=-1,\qquad \text{angles }\pm60^\circ,\,180^\circ.$$
Breakaway point. On $[-1,0]$ the two branches meet and leave the axis where $dK/ds=0$ with $K=-s(s+1)(s+2)$:
$$3s^{2}+6s+2=0\;\Rightarrow\;s=-0.423\ (\text{the root in }[-1,0]).$$
Imaginary-axis crossing. The characteristic equation is $s^{3}+3s^{2}+2s+K=0$; Routh marginal stability requires $3\cdot2=K$, so the locus crosses the $j\omega$ axis at
$$K=6,\qquad s=\pm j\sqrt2.$$
Thus the loop is stable for $0<K<6$; the $\zeta=0.5$ design will sit well inside this.
Impose $\zeta=0.5$. Let the complex pair be $s=-a\pm jb$ and the third (real) pole $-c$. A damping ratio $\zeta=0.5$ means the poles lie on rays at $60^\circ$ from the negative real axis, so $b=\sqrt3\,a$. Matching the cubic $s^{3}+3s^{2}+2s+K$ by Vieta:
$$\underbrace{2a+c=3}_{\text{sum}},\qquad \underbrace{a^{2}+b^{2}+2ac=2}_{\text{pair sum}}.$$
Substituting $b^{2}=3a^{2}$ and $c=3-2a$ into the second equation gives $3a=1$, so
$$a=\tfrac13,\qquad c=\tfrac73,\qquad b=\tfrac{\sqrt3}{3}=0.577.$$
The dominant poles are $s=-0.333\pm j0.577$ (check $\omega_n=\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}=\tfrac23$, $\zeta=a/\omega_n=0.5$ &checkmark).
Gain at the design point. $K$ equals the product of the pole magnitudes (constant term of the cubic):
$$K=(a^{2}+b^{2})\,c=\left(\tfrac49\right)\!\left(\tfrac73\right)=\frac{28}{27}=\boxed{1.037}.$$
Because $1.04\ll6$, the design is comfortably stable and the complex pair (closest to the $j\omega$ axis) dominates the response.