NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Control · May 2014

Question 6 of 6: Sinusoidal steady-state response of a first-order system

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2014 — 07-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Control. Closed book, 3 hours; a Casio or Sharp approved calculator and semi-log graph paper are the only aids. Six questions are printed; any four constitute a complete paper and all questions are of equal value (25 marks each). All six questions are solved in full. A Laplace-transform table is appended to the exam (pages 5–6) and two sheets of blank four-cycle semi-log paper are provided for the Bode work.

Reference texts. K. Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed. (Pearson) — Chapters 5–7; N. S. Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 8th ed. (Wiley) — Chapters 6–10; R. C. Dorf and R. H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems, 13th ed. (Pearson); G. F. Franklin, J. D. Powell and A. Emami-Naeini, Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, 8th ed. (Pearson). These are the standard Canadian undergraduate control texts and cover every technique used below (Routh–Hurwitz, root locus, Bode margins, static error constants, frequency response).

Notation. Throughout, K denotes the root-locus (pole–zero form) gain that multiplies the open-loop transfer function as printed, and ω is in rad/s. Magnitudes in decibels are 20 log10 of the magnitude ratio.

Question 6: Sinusoidal steady-state response of a first-order system (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. The Figure-3 system is a single first-order block with no feedback, $G(s)=\dfrac{2}{s+0.5}$, i.e. a dc gain of 4 and a pole at $s=-0.5$ (time constant $\tau=2$ s). The input is a cosine of amplitude 3 applied at $t=0$, first at $\omega=0.4$ rad/s and later at $\omega=4$ rad/s.

Find. (a) the steady-state output for $r(t)=3\cos 0.4t$; (b) the time after which the response may be regarded as steady state; (c) the steady-state output for $r(t)=3\cos 4t$.

[Figure not reproduced: Figure 3 redrawn: a single first-order block, 2/(s + 0.5), with no feedback. See the official exam paper.]

Approach. Use the frequency-response property of a stable linear time-invariant system: the steady-state response to a sinusoid is a sinusoid of the same frequency, scaled by $|G(j\omega)|$ and shifted by $\angle G(j\omega)$. The transient is the system's own exponential mode, so its duration is set by the pole, not by the input.

  1. Form the frequency response. Substituting $s=j\omega$, $$G(j\omega)=\frac{2}{j\omega+0.5}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad |G(j\omega)|=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\omega^{2}+0.25}},\qquad \angle G(j\omega)=-\tan^{-1}\frac{\omega}{0.5}$$ The magnitude falls and the lag grows with frequency, approaching $-90^\circ$ far above the corner at $\omega=0.5$ rad/s.
  2. Part (a): evaluate at $\omega=0.4$ rad/s. Here $$|G(j0.4)|=\frac{2}{\sqrt{0.16+0.25}}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{0.41}}=3.1235,\qquad \angle G(j0.4)=-\tan^{-1}(0.8)=-38.66^\circ$$ Multiplying by the input amplitude of 3, $$\boxed{\;c_{ss}(t)=9.370\cos\!\left(0.4t-38.66^\circ\right)=9.370\cos\!\left(0.4t-0.675\ \text{rad}\right)\;}$$ The drive is just below the corner frequency, so the system still passes most of the available dc gain of 4 and lags by well under $45^\circ$.
  3. Part (b): find when the transient has died. With $R(s)=3s/(s^{2}+0.16)$, the output is $C(s)=\dfrac{6s}{(s+0.5)(s^{2}+0.16)}$, whose partial-fraction expansion contains one natural mode from the system pole. Its residue is $$A=\left.\frac{6s}{s^{2}+0.16}\right|_{s=-0.5}=\frac{-3}{0.41}=-7.317$$ so the complete response is $c(t)=-7.317e^{-0.5t}+9.370\cos(0.4t-0.675)$, which correctly gives $c(0)=0$. The transient decays with the system time constant $$\tau=\frac{1}{0.5}=2\ \text{s}$$ and falls below 2 % of the steady-state amplitude after four time constants, so $$\boxed{\;t > 4\tau = 8\ \text{s}\quad(\text{within }1\%\ \text{after }5\tau=10\ \text{s})\;}$$ It is worth stressing that this answer depends only on the pole — changing the input frequency does not change how long the transient lasts.
  4. Part (c): evaluate at $\omega=4$ rad/s. Ten times the previous frequency and eight times the corner frequency, $$|G(j4)|=\frac{2}{\sqrt{16+0.25}}=\frac{2}{4.0311}=0.4961,\qquad \angle G(j4)=-\tan^{-1}(8)=-82.87^\circ$$ so the steady-state response is $$\boxed{\;c_{ss}(t)=1.488\cos\!\left(4t-82.87^\circ\right)=1.488\cos\!\left(4t-1.446\ \text{rad}\right)\;}$$
  5. Interpret the two results together. Raising the drive frequency by a factor of 10 has cut the output amplitude by a factor of $9.370/1.488=6.3$ and pushed the lag from $-38.7^\circ$ to nearly the $-90^\circ$ asymptote. This is the defining behaviour of a first-order low-pass element: above the corner the magnitude rolls off at $-20$ dB/decade while the phase saturates. The transient duration, however, is unchanged at about 8 s in both cases.
Question 6(a): transient dies in about 4τ = 8 s0.03.33333333333333356.66666666666666710.013.33333333333333416.66666666666666820.0-14.0-9.33-4.670.04.679.3314.0steady-state cₛₛ(t), ω = 0.4 rad/sfull response c(t) (transient + steady state)time t (s)c(t)
Complete response to 3 cos 0.4t (dashed) against its steady-state component (solid); the two merge once the exponential mode has decayed, after about 8 s.
Quantityω = 0.4 rad/sω = 4 rad/s
|G(jω)|3.12350.4961
∠G(jω)−38.66° (−0.675 rad)−82.87° (−1.446 rad)
Steady-state response 9.370 cos(0.4t − 38.66°) 1.488 cos(4t − 82.87°)
Transient mode−7.317 e−0.5t (τ = 2 s)
Steady state reached fort > 4τ = 8 s (1 % after 10 s)
Back to the paper →