Question 5 of 6: Gain for a specified damping ratio
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2018 — 16-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Control. Three hours, closed book; the only aid permitted is semi-log graph paper (plus an approved Casio or Sharp calculator). Six questions are printed and any four constitute a complete paper, all of equal value (25 marks each). All six questions are solved below. A table of Laplace transforms is appended to the paper as page 5 (the paper runs to five pages in total).
Reference texts.
Dorf & Bishop, Modern Control Systems, 14th ed. — block-diagram reduction (Ch. 2), performance and steady-state error (Ch. 5), Routh–Hurwitz (Ch. 6), root locus (Ch. 7), frequency response (Ch. 8).
Nise, Control Systems Engineering, 8th ed. — time response (Ch. 4), stability (Ch. 6), steady-state errors (Ch. 7), root locus (Ch. 8), frequency-domain techniques (Ch. 10).
Ogata, Modern Control Engineering, 5th ed. — Laplace methods (Ch. 2–3), transient/steady-state analysis (Ch. 5), root-locus and frequency-response design (Ch. 6–7).
Question 5: Gain for a specified damping ratio (25 marks)
Given. Unity negative feedback around $G(s)=K\left(s^{2}+6s+12\right)/\left[s^{2}(s+1)\right]$: a type-2 plant with a double pole at the origin, a pole at $-1$, and a complex zero pair at $-3\pm j1.732$. Target damping ratio $\zeta=0.707$.
Find. The gain $K$ that places the complex closed-loop pair on the $\zeta=0.707$ ray, and the resulting root locations.
Question 5 — root locus with the $\zeta=0.707$ ray ($45^{\circ}$ from the negative real axis in the $s$-plane) superimposed. The two axes are drawn to different scales, so the ray does not appear at $45^{\circ}$ on the page; read the locations off the axis labels.
Approach. Write the characteristic polynomial, force it to factor as a $\zeta=0.707$ quadratic times a real linear term, match coefficients to eliminate the unknown real root, and solve the single remaining equation for the pair location.
Form the characteristic equation. With unity feedback, $1+G(s)=0$ gives $s^{2}(s+1)+K\left(s^{2}+6s+12\right)=0$, i.e.$$s^{3}+(1+K)s^{2}+6Ks+12K=0 .$$It is cubic, so the closed loop has one real root and one complex pair for the gains of interest.
Impose the damping specification. A damping ratio $\zeta=1/\sqrt{2}=0.707$ puts the pair on a ray $45^{\circ}$ from the negative real axis, so the roots are $s=-a\pm ja$ with $a>0$, and the corresponding quadratic factor is $s^{2}+2as+2a^{2}$. Writing the third root as $-c$,$$\left(s^{2}+2as+2a^{2}\right)(s+c)=s^{3}+(2a+c)s^{2}+\left(2a^{2}+2ac\right)s+2a^{2}c .$$Comparing with the characteristic equation gives three conditions: $2a+c=1+K$, $2a^{2}+2ac=6K$ and $2a^{2}c=12K$.
Eliminate $K$ and $c$. Dividing the third condition by the second removes $K$: $2a^{2}c/\left(2a^{2}+2ac\right)=2$, which rearranges to $ac=2(a+c)$ and therefore $c=2a/(a-2)$. The third condition then gives $K=a^{2}c/6$, and substituting both into the first leaves one equation in $a$ alone:$$2a+\frac{2a}{a-2}=1+\frac{a^{2}}{6}\cdot\frac{2a}{a-2} .$$Solving numerically (bisection on $a>2$, which is required for $c>0$) gives a single positive root $a=4.1958$.
Back-substitute. With $a=4.1958$, $c=2(4.1958)/2.1958=3.8216$ and$$\boxed{\,K=\frac{a^{2}c}{6}=\frac{(4.1958)^{2}(3.8216)}{6}=11.21\,}$$The closed-loop roots at that gain are$$\boxed{\,s=-4.196\pm j4.196\ \ (\zeta=0.707,\ \omega_{n}=5.934),\qquad s=-3.822\,}$$Substituting $K=11.2133$ into $s^{3}+12.2133s^{2}+67.28s+134.56$ and factoring reproduces exactly these three roots, and $-4.196/\left|{-4.196+j4.196}\right|=0.7071$ confirms the damping ratio.
Examine the claim in the question. The paper asks the candidate to show that the complex roots are $-2.3\pm j2.3$. They are not. Substituting $s=-2.3+j2.3$ into the characteristic polynomial gives $\left(24.33-1.8K\right)+j\left(13.75+3.22K\right)$. The real part vanishes at $K=13.52$, but the imaginary part is then $57.3$, not zero — and no value of $K$ can null both simultaneously. At $K=13.52$ the actual complex pair is $-5.005\pm j3.306$ with $\zeta=0.835$. The stated roots therefore satisfy neither the characteristic equation nor the damping specification.
Comment on "dominant". At $K=11.21$ the real root $-3.822$ lies closer to the imaginary axis than the complex pair at $-4.196$, so strictly the real root is the dominant one and the $\zeta=0.707$ pair governs only the oscillatory content of the response. The question’s wording follows the usual textbook shorthand; the design is still well behaved, but a second-order approximation based on the complex pair alone would under-predict the settling time.
Check: the printed target $s=-2.3\pm j2.3$ is inconsistent with the given plant. It is treated here as an error in the question paper (most likely carried over from a different transfer function), and the assumption is declared in accordance with Note 1 of the examination, which invites candidates to state any assumption about interpretation. The graded quantity — the gain that yields $\zeta=0.707$ — is computed from the plant as printed and is $K=11.21$, with roots $-4.196\pm j4.196$ and $-3.822$. Candidates who reproduce the printed roots by adjusting the plant should expect them not to close.