NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Control · May 2018

Question 5 of 6: Gain for a specified damping ratio

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, May 2018 — 16-Mec-A3 System Analysis and Control. Three hours, closed book; the only aid permitted is semi-log graph paper (plus an approved Casio or Sharp calculator). Six questions are printed and any four constitute a complete paper, all of equal value (25 marks each). All six questions are solved below. A table of Laplace transforms is appended to the paper as page 5 (the paper runs to five pages in total).

Reference texts.

Question 5: Gain for a specified damping ratio (25 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Unity negative feedback around $G(s)=K\left(s^{2}+6s+12\right)/\left[s^{2}(s+1)\right]$: a type-2 plant with a double pole at the origin, a pole at $-1$, and a complex zero pair at $-3\pm j1.732$. Target damping ratio $\zeta=0.707$.

Find. The gain $K$ that places the complex closed-loop pair on the $\zeta=0.707$ ray, and the resulting root locations.

-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1012-6-5-4-3-2-10123456ReIms = −4.196 + j4.196 (K = 11.21)third root −3.822× open-loop poles (0, 0, −1) ○ zeros (−3 ± j1.732) dashed: ζ = 0.707 ray
Question 5 — root locus with the $\zeta=0.707$ ray ($45^{\circ}$ from the negative real axis in the $s$-plane) superimposed. The two axes are drawn to different scales, so the ray does not appear at $45^{\circ}$ on the page; read the locations off the axis labels.

Approach. Write the characteristic polynomial, force it to factor as a $\zeta=0.707$ quadratic times a real linear term, match coefficients to eliminate the unknown real root, and solve the single remaining equation for the pair location.

  1. Form the characteristic equation. With unity feedback, $1+G(s)=0$ gives $s^{2}(s+1)+K\left(s^{2}+6s+12\right)=0$, i.e.$$s^{3}+(1+K)s^{2}+6Ks+12K=0 .$$It is cubic, so the closed loop has one real root and one complex pair for the gains of interest.
  2. Impose the damping specification. A damping ratio $\zeta=1/\sqrt{2}=0.707$ puts the pair on a ray $45^{\circ}$ from the negative real axis, so the roots are $s=-a\pm ja$ with $a>0$, and the corresponding quadratic factor is $s^{2}+2as+2a^{2}$. Writing the third root as $-c$,$$\left(s^{2}+2as+2a^{2}\right)(s+c)=s^{3}+(2a+c)s^{2}+\left(2a^{2}+2ac\right)s+2a^{2}c .$$Comparing with the characteristic equation gives three conditions: $2a+c=1+K$, $2a^{2}+2ac=6K$ and $2a^{2}c=12K$.
  3. Eliminate $K$ and $c$. Dividing the third condition by the second removes $K$: $2a^{2}c/\left(2a^{2}+2ac\right)=2$, which rearranges to $ac=2(a+c)$ and therefore $c=2a/(a-2)$. The third condition then gives $K=a^{2}c/6$, and substituting both into the first leaves one equation in $a$ alone:$$2a+\frac{2a}{a-2}=1+\frac{a^{2}}{6}\cdot\frac{2a}{a-2} .$$Solving numerically (bisection on $a>2$, which is required for $c>0$) gives a single positive root $a=4.1958$.
  4. Back-substitute. With $a=4.1958$, $c=2(4.1958)/2.1958=3.8216$ and$$\boxed{\,K=\frac{a^{2}c}{6}=\frac{(4.1958)^{2}(3.8216)}{6}=11.21\,}$$The closed-loop roots at that gain are$$\boxed{\,s=-4.196\pm j4.196\ \ (\zeta=0.707,\ \omega_{n}=5.934),\qquad s=-3.822\,}$$Substituting $K=11.2133$ into $s^{3}+12.2133s^{2}+67.28s+134.56$ and factoring reproduces exactly these three roots, and $-4.196/\left|{-4.196+j4.196}\right|=0.7071$ confirms the damping ratio.
  5. Examine the claim in the question. The paper asks the candidate to show that the complex roots are $-2.3\pm j2.3$. They are not. Substituting $s=-2.3+j2.3$ into the characteristic polynomial gives $\left(24.33-1.8K\right)+j\left(13.75+3.22K\right)$. The real part vanishes at $K=13.52$, but the imaginary part is then $57.3$, not zero — and no value of $K$ can null both simultaneously. At $K=13.52$ the actual complex pair is $-5.005\pm j3.306$ with $\zeta=0.835$. The stated roots therefore satisfy neither the characteristic equation nor the damping specification.
  6. Comment on "dominant". At $K=11.21$ the real root $-3.822$ lies closer to the imaginary axis than the complex pair at $-4.196$, so strictly the real root is the dominant one and the $\zeta=0.707$ pair governs only the oscillatory content of the response. The question’s wording follows the usual textbook shorthand; the design is still well behaved, but a second-order approximation based on the complex pair alone would under-predict the settling time.

Check: the printed target $s=-2.3\pm j2.3$ is inconsistent with the given plant. It is treated here as an error in the question paper (most likely carried over from a different transfer function), and the assumption is declared in accordance with Note 1 of the examination, which invites candidates to state any assumption about interpretation. The graded quantity — the gain that yields $\zeta=0.707$ — is computed from the plant as printed and is $K=11.21$, with roots $-4.196\pm j4.196$ and $-3.822$. Candidates who reproduce the printed roots by adjusting the plant should expect them not to close.

QuantityResult
Characteristic equation$s^{3}+(1+K)s^{2}+6Ks+12K=0$
Pair location parameter $a$$4.1958$
Third (real) root$s=-3.8216$
Gain for $\zeta=0.707$$K=11.21$
Complex roots$s=-4.196\pm j4.196$
Natural frequency of the pair$\omega_{n}=5.934$ rad/s
Printed roots $-2.3\pm j2.3$not a solution for any $K$ (see check note)