Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2018 — 16-Mec-A4 Design and Manufacture of Machine Elements. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator. Six questions in two parts: Part A (Q1–Q3, manufacturing processes) and Part B (Q4–Q6, machine-element analysis). The rubric asks for two questions from each part — four questions constitute a complete paper, each worth 25 %. All six are solved here, since the set is intended as a study resource.
Reference texts.
Kalpakjian, S. & Schmid, S., Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 8th ed. — Ch. 11–12 (casting processes and design), Ch. 16 (sheet-metal forming), Ch. 30 (fusion welding).
Groover, M. P., Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing, 7th ed. — Ch. 10–11 (casting), Sec. 20.5 (stretch forming).
Budynas, R. & Nisbett, K., Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, 11th ed. — Ch. 9 (welding, weld-as-a-line, Tables 9-2 and 9-3).
Hibbeler, R. C., Engineering Mechanics: Statics, 14th ed. — Ch. 6 (frames and machines), Ch. 8 (dry friction).
Hibbeler, R. C., Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. — Sec. 4.6 (thermal stress in statically indeterminate axial members).
Check: every boxed result in this paper,
which also carries the independent closure checks noted in each question (moment closure on Q4, volume conservation on Q2, gap compatibility on Q6).
Top-flange projection (same dimensions as the mounting flange)
$L$
8 in
Allowable combined stress in the weld metal
$\tau_{\text{all}}$
850 lb/in²
Loading
$W$
uniformly distributed over the top flange
Find. The largest total load $W$ the bracket can carry without the combined stress in the weld metal exceeding 850 psi.
The mounting flange is fillet-welded to the support along its two 8-in vertical edges. The uniformly distributed load on the 8-in top flange is statically equivalent to $W$ acting 4 in from the wall, so the weld group sees direct shear $W$ plus a bending moment $4W$ about the horizontal axis.
Approach. Use Shigley's weld-as-a-line method: reduce the weld group to a line of unit width, obtain the unit area and unit section modulus from Table 9-2, convert each to a throat property by multiplying by $0.707h$, then combine the primary (direct shear) and secondary (bending) stresses vectorially and set the resultant equal to the allowable.
Reduce the loading to the weld plane. The load is uniform over the 8-in projection of the top flange, so its resultant acts at mid-length:
$$V = W \qquad M = W\!\left(\frac{8}{2}\right) = 4W \ \ \text{[lb}\cdot\text{in]}$$
Identify the weld pattern and its unit properties. Two parallel vertical fillet welds of length $d = 8$ in run up the sides of the mounting flange. From Shigley Table 9-2 (case 3),
$$A_u = 2d = 16.0\ \text{in} \qquad I_u = \frac{d^{3}}{6} = 85.33\ \text{in}^{3} \qquad S_u = \frac{I_u}{d/2} = \frac{d^{2}}{3} = 21.33\ \text{in}^{2}$$
The 1-in flange width does not enter, because the bending axis is horizontal and both welds lie in the plane of the wall.
Convert to throat properties. A fillet weld of leg $h$ has throat $0.707h$, so
$$A = 0.707hA_u = 0.707(0.0598)(16.0) = 0.6765\ \text{in}^{2}$$
$$S = 0.707hS_u = 0.707(0.0598)(21.33) = 0.9020\ \text{in}^{3}$$
Write the primary shear stress. The direct load is carried uniformly over the throat area:
$$\tau' = \frac{V}{A} = \frac{W}{0.6765} = 1.478W$$
Write the secondary (bending) stress. The moment produces a normal stress on the throat, treated in this method as a stress component perpendicular to $\tau'$:
$$\tau'' = \frac{M}{S} = \frac{4W}{0.9020} = 4.435W$$
Bending dominates by a factor of three, which is what one expects from an 8-in cantilever welded over only 8 in of height.
Combine the two components. They act at right angles on the throat, so
$$\tau = \sqrt{(\tau')^{2}+(\tau'')^{2}} = W\sqrt{1.478^{2}+4.435^{2}} = 4.675W$$
Impose the allowable stress and solve. Setting $\tau = \tau_{\text{all}} = 850$ psi,
$$W = \frac{850}{4.675}$$
$$\boxed{W \approx 182\ \text{lb}}$$
The result is modest because the whole assembly is 16-gauge sheet: the throat is only 0.042 in deep, so 16 in of weld provides just two-thirds of a square inch of shear area. If a larger capacity were needed, the effective move is to increase the welded height rather than the leg size, since the bending term varies as $d^{2}$ while the shear term varies only as $d$.
Result
Value
Moment arm of the distributed load
4.0 in
Throat area of the weld group
0.6765 in²
Throat section modulus
0.9020 in³
Primary (direct shear) stress
$1.478W$ psi
Secondary (bending) stress
$4.435W$ psi
Allowable total load
$W \approx 182$ lb
Check: the exam does not state which edges of the mounting flange are welded. The answer above assumes fillet welds along the two 8-in vertical edges only, which is the normal practice for a narrow formed flange and is the conservative reading. If instead the flange is welded all around its 8 in × 1 in perimeter (Shigley Table 9-2, case 5: $A_u = 18$ in, $S_u = 29.33$ in²), the same calculation gives $W \approx 244$ lb — about 34 % higher. State the weld layout as an assumption with the answer, as the exam rubric invites.