NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A5 Electrical and Electronics Engineering · May 2013

Question 8 of 8: Magnetic Circuit — Induced Voltages and Input Impedance

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. PEO/EGBC National Examinations, May 2013 — 07-Mec-A5 Electrical & Electronics Engineering (Mechanical Engineering). Three hours, closed book, two approved calculators (Casio or Sharp). Eight questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper, and only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked. Constants supplied on the front page: $\pi = 3.14159$, $1\ \text{hp} = 746\ \text{W}$, $\mu_0 = 4\pi\times10^{-7}\ \text{H}\,\text{m}^{-1}$. All eight questions are solved here so the solutions cover whichever five a candidate chooses.

Reference texts
  • Sedra & Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. — BJT current mirrors (Ch. 8), op-amp circuits (Ch. 2).
  • Mano & Ciletti, Digital Design, 6th ed. — Boolean algebra and DeMorgan’s theorems (Ch. 2), NAND/NOR universal gates (Ch. 3).
  • Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed. — dc machine emf and torque (Ch. 7–8), induction motors and the dc test (Ch. 6), transformers (Ch. 2).
  • Sadiku & Alexander, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, 7th ed. — ac power and power-factor correction (Ch. 11), first-order transients (Ch. 7), frequency response (Ch. 14).
  • Hayt, Kemmerly & Durbin, Engineering Circuit Analysis, 9th ed. — phasor methods and transfer functions.

Question 8: Magnetic Circuit — Induced Voltages and Input Impedance (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

SymbolQuantity
$N_1$, $N_2$primary and secondary turns
$\ell$mean magnetic path length (m) — written $L$ on the paper
$A$core cross-sectional area (m$^2$)
$\mu_R$relative permeability of the core
$\mu_0$$4\pi\times10^{-7}$ H m$^{-1}$ (front page)
$i_1(t)$$I_p \sin \omega t$

The secondary is open-circuited into a voltmeter, so it carries no current; winding resistance, leakage flux and core losses are neglected, and the permeability is taken as constant (no saturation).

Find. [a] $v_1(t)$ and $v_2(t)$ in terms of $i_1(t)$; [b] the input impedance seen at the primary; [c] the waveforms of $v_{AB}$ and $v_{XY}$ relative to $i_1(t)$.

iron coreℓ, A, μRN₁ turnsN₂ turnsv₁(t)i₁(t)ABVXYv₂(t)φ(t)single flux path links both windings; leakage and winding resistance neglected
Figure 8 — the magnetic circuit. A single flux $\varphi(t)$, driven by the primary mmf, links both windings; the open-circuited secondary carries no current and contributes no mmf.

Approach. Compute the reluctance of the core from its geometry, get the flux from the primary mmf, then apply Faraday’s law to each winding; the ratio of primary voltage to primary current gives the impedance.

  1. Reluctance of the magnetic circuit. For a uniform core of mean length $\ell$, area $A$ and permeability $\mu = \mu_0\mu_R$, $$\mathcal{R} = \frac{\ell}{\mu_0 \mu_R A}\ \ \text{A⋅turns/Wb}.$$ This is the magnetic analogue of $R = \rho\ell/A$ for a resistor.
  2. Flux from the primary mmf. The secondary is open, so the primary supplies the entire mmf $\mathcal{F} = N_1 i_1(t)$ and $$\varphi(t) = \frac{\mathcal{F}}{\mathcal{R}} = \frac{N_1 i_1(t)}{\mathcal{R}} = \frac{\mu_0 \mu_R A N_1}{\ell}\,i_1(t).$$ Flux is therefore in phase with, and proportional to, the primary current.
  3. [a] Primary voltage by Faraday’s law. With $N_1$ turns linking that flux, and with winding resistance neglected so the terminal voltage equals the induced emf, $$v_1(t) = N_1 \frac{\mathrm{d}\varphi}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{N_1^{2}}{\mathcal{R}}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}i_1}{\mathrm{d}t} = L_1 \frac{\mathrm{d}i_1}{\mathrm{d}t}, \qquad L_1 = \frac{N_1^{2}}{\mathcal{R}} = \frac{\mu_0\mu_R A N_1^{2}}{\ell}.$$ Substituting $i_1 = I_p \sin\omega t$, $$\boxed{\;v_1(t) = \frac{\mu_0\mu_R A N_1^{2}}{\ell}\,\omega I_p \cos\omega t = \omega L_1 I_p \cos\omega t\;}$$
  4. Secondary voltage. The same flux links $N_2$ turns, so $$v_2(t) = N_2 \frac{\mathrm{d}\varphi}{\mathrm{d}t} = \frac{N_1 N_2}{\mathcal{R}}\,\frac{\mathrm{d}i_1}{\mathrm{d}t} = M\,\frac{\mathrm{d}i_1}{\mathrm{d}t}, \qquad M = \frac{N_1 N_2}{\mathcal{R}},$$ that is $$\boxed{\;v_2(t) = \frac{\mu_0\mu_R A N_1 N_2}{\ell}\,\omega I_p \cos\omega t = \frac{N_2}{N_1}\,v_1(t)\;}$$ The ideal-transformer turns ratio drops straight out, as it must when leakage is neglected.
  5. [b] Input impedance. In phasor form $i_1 \to I_p$ and $v_1 \to j\omega L_1 I_p$, so $$\boxed{\;Z_{\text{in}} = \frac{V_1}{I_1} = j\omega L_1 = j\,\frac{\mu_0\mu_R A N_1^{2}\,\omega}{\ell}\;}$$ with magnitude $\omega L_1$ and phase exactly $+90^\circ$. With losses neglected and the secondary open, the circuit presents a pure magnetising inductance — it consumes no real power, only reactive.
  6. [c] Waveform relationships. The current is a sine and both voltages are cosines of the same frequency, so each voltage leads the current by $90^\circ$ (a quarter cycle): the voltages peak as the current passes through zero, and are zero as the current peaks. Their peak magnitudes are $$\hat V_{AB} = \omega L_1 I_p = \frac{\mu_0\mu_R A N_1^{2}\omega I_p}{\ell}, \qquad \hat V_{XY} = \frac{N_2}{N_1}\,\hat V_{AB},$$ and the two voltages are in phase with each other (for the winding sense shown, with $A$ and $X$ as the corresponding dotted terminals).
i₁(t) = Ip sin ωtvAB = ωL₁Ip cos ωtvXY = (N₂/N₁) vAB90° (v leads i)π/2π3π/22πωtboth induced voltages lead the primary current by a quarter cycle
Part [c] — $i_1(t)$ sinusoidal, with $v_{AB}$ and $v_{XY}$ both cosinusoidal and therefore leading the current by 90°; the secondary amplitude is scaled by $N_2/N_1$.
Check: numerical scale check The question is symbolic. Substituting a representative core — $N_1 = 500$, $N_2 = 250$, $\ell = 0.60$ m, $A = 2.0\times10^{-3}$ m$^2$, $\mu_R = 2500$, $I_p = 1.5$ A at 60 Hz — gives $\mathcal{R} = 9.55\times10^{4}$ A⋅t/Wb, $L_1 = 2.62$ H, $M = 1.31$ H, and hence $\hat V_{AB} = 1481$ V peak with $\hat V_{XY} = 740$ V peak. These are plausible magnitudes for such a core and confirm the algebra dimensionally.
QuantityResult
Core reluctance$\mathcal{R} = \ell/(\mu_0\mu_R A)$
Core flux$\varphi(t) = N_1 i_1(t)/\mathcal{R}$
Self-inductance$L_1 = \mu_0\mu_R A N_1^{2}/\ell$
Mutual inductance$M = \mu_0\mu_R A N_1 N_2/\ell$
[a] Primary voltage$v_1 = L_1\,\mathrm{d}i_1/\mathrm{d}t = \omega L_1 I_p\cos\omega t$
[a] Secondary voltage$v_2 = M\,\mathrm{d}i_1/\mathrm{d}t = (N_2/N_1)v_1$
[b] Input impedance$Z_{\text{in}} = j\omega L_1$ (purely inductive, $\angle +90^\circ$)
[c] Phase relationboth voltages lead $i_1$ by 90°; amplitude ratio $N_2/N_1$
Back to the paper →