22-Mec-A5 Electrical and Electronics Engineering · December 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Paper format. PEO / Engineers Canada National Examinations, December 2014 — 07-Mec-A5, Electrical & Electronics Engineering (Mechanical Engineering discipline). Three hours, closed book, one approved Casio or Sharp calculator. Eight questions; any five constitute a complete paper and each question is of equal value, so each counted question carries 20 marks. All eight questions are solved below, because this set is a study resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts. A. S. Sedra and K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. (BJT current mirrors, op-amp frequency response); M. M. Mano and M. D. Ciletti, Digital Design, 6th ed. (universal-gate synthesis, DeMorgan reduction); S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed. (dc machines, transformer magnetic circuits, induction-motor testing and slip); C. K. Alexander and M. N. O. Sadiku, Fundamentals of Electric Circuits, 7th ed. (phasor analysis, power factor, first-order transients); W. H. Hayt and J. A. Buck, Engineering Electromagnetics, 9th ed. (magnetic circuits and induced emf).
Front-page constants. Note [8] of the examination paper supplies μ0 = 4π × 10−7 H·m−1, π = 3.14159 and 1 hp = 746 W. All three are used exactly as printed; μ0 enters in Question 4 and the horsepower conversion in Question 3.
Check: data-table exponent. The Question 4 specification table reads 3.77 × 10−2 m and 7.54 × 10−2 m, and only those values give a physically sensible core (a few centimetres of flux path rather than several hundred metres) and reluctances that land on the round figures 1.5 × 106 and 3.0 × 106 A/Wb. The negative exponents are used throughout.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given.
| Quantity | Symbol | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Source voltage (rms) | $V$ | $1\angle 0^{\circ}$ V |
| Resistance | $Z_R$ | $1\,\Omega$ |
| Inductive impedance | $Z_L$ | $+j1\,\Omega$ |
| Capacitive impedance (Part II only) | $Z_C$ | $-j1\,\Omega$ |
| Topology | — | all branches in parallel across the source |
Find. Every branch current and the total current as phasors, plus the real power and system power factor, both before and after the capacitor is added.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 8a redrawn — the Part I network. All branches share the source voltage. See the official exam paper.]
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 8b redrawn — the Part II network with the capacitor added in parallel with the inductor. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Because every branch sits directly across the source, each branch current follows from Ohm's law in phasor form with the same voltage; the total current is their phasor sum, and complex power $S=V I_T^{*}$ then yields both the real power and the power factor.
The engineering point of the comparison is that the real power did not change: it is 1.000 W in both parts, because the resistor is the only element that dissipates energy and its current is untouched. What changed is the current the source and the supply cables must carry, which fell from 1.414 A to 1.000 A — a reduction to $1/\sqrt{2}$, or about 29 %. Since conductor losses scale with the square of current, the distribution losses feeding this load fall to half their former value. This is the entire commercial case for power-factor correction, and it is why utilities bill large customers on apparent power or impose a power-factor penalty: the reactive current occupies capacity in generators, transformers and cables while doing no useful work.
Check: the resonance is exact only at the stated frequency. The perfect cancellation in Part II occurs because $|Z_L|=|Z_C|=1\,\Omega$, which is true at one frequency only. This network is at parallel resonance, so at any other supply frequency the two reactive currents no longer cancel and the power factor degrades — inductive above resonance, capacitive below. In a real installation the correction capacitor is sized for the nominal supply frequency and the load's operating point, and over-correction at light load is a recognised hazard.
| Quantity | Part I (R ∥ L) | Part II (R ∥ L ∥ C) |
|---|---|---|
| $I_1$ (through R) | $1.000\angle 0^{\circ}$ A | $1.000\angle 0^{\circ}$ A |
| $I_2$ (through L) | $1.000\angle -90^{\circ}$ A | $1.000\angle -90^{\circ}$ A |
| $I_3$ (through C) | — | $1.000\angle +90^{\circ}$ A |
| $I_T$ (total) | $1.414\angle -45^{\circ}$ A | $1.000\angle 0^{\circ}$ A |
| Real power $P$ | 1.000 W | 1.000 W |
| Reactive power $Q$ | 1.000 var lagging | 0 |
| Power factor | 0.707 lagging | 1.000 (unity) |