NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-A5 Electrical and Electronics Engineering · May 2018

Question 5 of 8: Instrumentation Amplifier — Transfer Function by Superposition

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. PEO/Engineers Canada National Examination 16-Mec-A5 Electrical & Electronics Engineering, May 2018 — 3 hours, closed book, Casio or Sharp approved calculator only. Eight questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All eight are solved here, since the set is intended as a study resource.

Constants printed on the front page. $\pi = 3.14159$, $1\ \text{hp} = 746\ \text{W}$, and the permeability of free space $\mu_0 = 4\pi \times 10^{-7}\ \text{H}\,\text{m}^{-1}$.

Reference texts for this subject.

Question 5: Instrumentation Amplifier — Transfer Function by Superposition (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Two ideal buffers $U_1$ and $U_2$ receive $E_1$ and $E_2$ at their non-inverting inputs; their inverting inputs are joined through the single gain-setting resistor $R_1$, and each is fed back from its own output through $aR_1$ and $bR_1$ respectively. The output stage $U_3$ is a difference amplifier of gain $c$, so that $E_0 = c(e_y - e_x)$.

Find. The overall transfer function $E_0$ as a function of the two inputs $E_1$ and $E_2$ and the constants $a$, $b$ and $c$.

+−U1E1aR1x+−U2E2bR1yR1−+U3R/cR/cRRE0three-op-amp instrumentation amplifier: U1/U2 buffer and pre-amplify, U3 takes the difference
Figure 5 — circuit schematic. This is the classical three-operational-amplifier instrumentation amplifier: $U_1$ and $U_2$ form the differential input stage, $U_3$ the difference stage.

Approach. The two ideal assumptions do all the work. A zero differential input voltage forces each buffer's inverting terminal to sit at its own source potential, which puts a known voltage across $R_1$; zero input current then forces that entire current to continue through $aR_1$ and $bR_1$, which fixes both output potentials. The results are combined by the given difference-stage relation, and the superposition route suggested by the hint is carried out afterwards as an independent check.

  1. Apply the virtual-short assumption. Since the differential input voltage of each ideal amplifier is zero and the non-inverting terminals are driven directly by the sources, the inverting terminals follow: $$v^{-}_{U_1} = E_1, \qquad v^{-}_{U_2} = E_2.$$ These two nodes are the ends of $R_1$, so the full input difference appears across it.
  2. Find the current in the gain-setting resistor. The voltage across $R_1$ is $E_1 - E_2$, so $$i = \frac{E_1-E_2}{R_1}.$$ Because no current enters either inverting terminal, this same $i$ must have arrived through $aR_1$ from the output of $U_1$ and must continue through $bR_1$ into the output of $U_2$. One current flows through all three resistors in series — this is the central insight of the topology.
  3. Work out the potential at x. Travelling from the inverting node of $U_1$ back through $aR_1$ to its output, $$e_x = E_1 + i\,(aR_1) = E_1 + a(E_1-E_2).$$
  4. Work out the potential at y. Travelling from the inverting node of $U_2$ through $bR_1$ to its output, in the direction the current leaves, $$e_y = E_2 - i\,(bR_1) = E_2 - b(E_1-E_2).$$
  5. Combine through the difference stage. Substituting into the given relation $E_0 = c(e_y-e_x)$, $$E_0 = c\Big[\,E_2 - b(E_1-E_2) - E_1 - a(E_1-E_2)\,\Big] = c\Big[-(E_1-E_2) - (a+b)(E_1-E_2)\Big],$$ so the transfer function of the complete circuit is $$E_0 = \boxed{c\,(1+a+b)\,(E_2-E_1)}$$
  6. Confirm by superposition, as the hint directs. Setting $E_2 = 0$ gives $e_x = E_1(1+a)$ and $e_y = -bE_1$, hence a partial output $-c(1+a+b)E_1$. Setting $E_1 = 0$ gives $e_x = -aE_2$ and $e_y = E_2(1+b)$, hence a partial output $+c(1+a+b)E_2$. Adding the two partial responses reproduces $E_0 = c(1+a+b)(E_2-E_1)$, confirming the direct derivation.
  7. Note the common-mode behaviour. The result depends only on the difference $E_2-E_1$. If both inputs are raised together by any amount, no current flows in $R_1$, both buffer outputs rise by that same amount, and the difference stage rejects them entirely — the ideal common-mode gain is exactly zero.
Final results — Question 5
QuantityResult
Potential at x$e_x = E_1 + a(E_1-E_2)$
Potential at y$e_y = E_2 - b(E_1-E_2)$
Current in the gain resistor$i = (E_1-E_2)/R_1$
Overall transfer function$E_0 = c(1+a+b)(E_2-E_1)$
Equivalent form$E_0 = -c(1+a+b)(E_1-E_2)$
Differential gain$c(1+a+b)$
Ideal common-mode gain0