Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Examination 07-Mec-A6 — Fluid Machinery, December 2013. Closed book, 3 hours. Section A (Calculative) Q1–Q5, Section B (Descriptive) Q6–Q8; candidates answer four from A and two from B (six of eight, 60 marks). All eight questions are solved as a study resource.
Reference texts: Fox & McDonald, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics (turbomachinery chapter); S.L. Dixon & C.A. Hall, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery; R.K. Turton, Principles of Turbomachinery; Cohen, Rogers & Saravanamuttoo, Gas Turbine Theory. Constants used (exam reference sheet): g = 9.81 m/s², ρwater = 1000 kg/m³, Patm = 100 kPa.
Given. From FIG. 602 the water surfaces are: reservoir normal high WL 45.54 m, normal low WL 42.97 m; tailrace full-load WL 27.30 m. Turbine-generator max power 4 MW, η = 100%, frictionless. The 18.52 m vertical dimension on the drawing sets the drawing scale, from which the steel penstock bore scales to ≈ 2.8 m.
Find. Flow rate and penstock velocity at the design (low-water) head, and the velocity at the higher (normal-high-water) head.
Gross head is the difference between reservoir and tailrace water surfaces; the penstock bore is scaled from the 18.52 m dimension on the drawing.
Approach. With 100% efficiency and no friction the gross head between reservoir and tailrace surfaces is the head across the machine; get Q from P = ρgQH, then V = Q/A with the scaled penstock area.
Operating head at low water. Gross head between reservoir normal-low and tailrace full-load surfaces: $$H_a = 42.97-27.30 = \boxed{15.67\ \text{m}}$$
Flow rate at maximum power. From $P=\rho g Q H$ with $\eta=1$: $$Q_a=\frac{P}{\rho g H_a}=\frac{4\times10^{6}}{1000\cdot 9.81\cdot 15.67}=\boxed{26.0\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}$$
Penstock diameter from the drawing. Scaling the penstock bore against the 18.52 m reference gives $D\approx 2.8\ \text{m}$, so $A=\tfrac{\pi}{4}D^{2}=\tfrac{\pi}{4}(2.8)^2=6.16\ \text{m}^2$.
Effect of higher reservoir level (c). At normal high WL the head rises to $H_c=45.54-27.30=18.24\ \text{m}$. Because the power is fixed at 4 MW, a larger head requires a smaller flow ($Q=P/\rho g H$), hence a lower penstock velocity.
Velocity at high water (d). $Q_c=\dfrac{4\times10^{6}}{1000\cdot 9.81\cdot 18.24}=22.4\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$, so $$V_d=\frac{22.4}{6.16}=\boxed{3.6\ \text{m/s}}$$
Check: The penstock diameter is estimated from the sketch (D ≈ 2.8 m, roughly ±0.2 m). The velocities scale as 1/D², but the qualitative result in (c) and the ratio Vb/Vd = Qa/Qc = 1.16 are independent of the diameter estimate.
Find. Hydraulic (water) power delivered across the machine, the electrical output, and the overall turbine-generator efficiency.
Approach. Apply the steady-flow energy equation between the inlet and outlet gauges to get the total head H across the machine (pressure + velocity + elevation heads); water power is ρgQH; efficiency is electrical output over water power.
Head across the machine. With $p_{in}/\rho g = 226000/(1000\cdot 9.81)=23.04\ \text{m}$, $p_{out}=-4.5\ \text{m}$ (given as head), and the inlet 5.0 m above the outlet: $$H=\Big(\tfrac{p_{in}}{\rho g}+\tfrac{V_{in}^2}{2g}+z_{in}\Big)-\Big(\tfrac{p_{out}}{\rho g}+\tfrac{V_{out}^2}{2g}+z_{out}\Big)$$$$H=23.04+6.17+5.0-(-4.5)-4.31=\boxed{34.4\ \text{m}}$$