22-Mec-A7 Advanced Strength of Materials · December 2014
Question 1 of 8: Buckling of the tubular compression strut BC
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams — December 2014, 07-Mec-A7 Advanced Strength of Materials. Open-book, 3 hours; any five of the eight problems constitute a complete paper and all problems are of equal value. All eight problems are solved as a study resource.
Given. A bracket frame with beam AB pinned to the wall at A and diagonal two-force strut BC pinned at C (wall) and B; the tube is Do = 40 mm, t = 4 mm.
Given data
Vertical rise A–C
1.0 m
Horizontal span to B (= AB)
2.0 m
Applied load at mid-span of AB
30,000 N (down)
Tube outer diameter / wall
40 mm / 4 mm
Young’s modulus E
205 GPa
Yield stress σY
380 MPa
Find. (a) the factor of safety of BC against elastic (Euler) buckling; (b) the wall thickness giving a buckling factor of safety of 3.
Frame ABC: A and C are pinned to the wall (1.0 m apart); B lies 2.0 m out. AB is a beam carrying the 30 kN mid-span load; BC is the diagonal two-force strut.
Approach. Resolve the axial force in the two-force strut BC by taking moments about A on beam AB, then compare it with the Euler critical load of a pin-ended tube.
Axial compression in BC. The strut is a two-force member, so its reaction on beam AB acts along BC. Taking moments about A (span AB = 2.0 m, load at mid-span 1.0 m), the vertical component of the strut reaction is $V_B\cdot 2.0 = 30000\cdot 1.0$, so $V_B = 15\,000\ \text{N}$. With the strut inclined at $\tan\theta = 1.0/2.0$ ($\sin\theta = 1/\sqrt5$), the axial force is
$$P_{BC}=\frac{V_B}{\sin\theta}=15000\sqrt5 = \boxed{33.54\ \text{kN (compression)}}$$
Section properties of the tube. With $D_o=40$ mm and $D_i=40-2(4)=32$ mm,
$$I=\frac{\pi}{64}\left(D_o^4-D_i^4\right)=\frac{\pi}{64}\left(40^4-32^4\right)=7.42\times10^{4}\ \text{mm}^4,\quad A=\frac{\pi}{4}\left(40^2-32^2\right)=452\ \text{mm}^2$$
Euler critical load. The strut length is $L_{BC}=\sqrt{2.0^2+1.0^2}=2.236$ m and both ends are pinned ($K=1$):
$$P_{cr}=\frac{\pi^2 E I}{L_{BC}^2}=\frac{\pi^2 (205\,000)(7.42\times10^4)}{(2236)^2}=\boxed{30.0\ \text{kN}}$$
The buckling stress $\sigma_{cr}=P_{cr}/A=66.4\ \text{MPa}\lt 380\ \text{MPa}$, so the column is long and Euler (elastic) buckling governs.
Factor of safety (part a).
$$\text{FoS}=\frac{P_{cr}}{P_{BC}}=\frac{30.0}{33.54}=\boxed{0.90}$$
Because FoS < 1, the strut as detailed cannot carry the load — it buckles elastically.
Thickness for FoS = 3 (part b). Requiring $P_{cr}=3P_{BC}=100.6$ kN gives a required second moment
$$I_{req}=\frac{P_{cr,req}L_{BC}^2}{\pi^2 E}=2.49\times10^{5}\ \text{mm}^4.$$
Keeping $D_o=40$ mm, the largest achievable value is that of a solid bar, $I_{solid}=\tfrac{\pi}{64}(40)^4=1.26\times10^{5}\ \text{mm}^4$, which is only half of $I_{req}$. Hence no wall thickness at $D_o=40$ mm reaches FoS = 3 (a solid 40 mm bar gives FoS ≈ 1.52). The section must be enlarged: a solid diameter of $D=\left(64I_{req}/\pi\right)^{1/4}=\boxed{47.4\ \text{mm}}$ (or a larger-diameter tube) is required.
Check: With the stated 40 mm outer diameter the strut is unstable (FoS = 0.90) and part (b)’s target of FoS = 3 is geometrically impossible for any wall thickness (it would demand more material than a solid 40 mm bar). The honest engineering answer is that the outer diameter must grow — a solid ∅47.4 mm bar (or an equivalent larger tube) achieves FoS = 3. The numbers are solved as given.