22-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation · Undated paper
Question 2 of 8: Heat Recovery Steam Generator
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, May 2019 — 16-Mec-B3 Energy Conversion and Power Generation. Three hours, closed book. Section A is calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B descriptive (Questions 6–8); candidates answer four questions from Section A and two from Section B, six questions of ten marks each for a total of sixty. Reference data for particular questions are bound in as pages 10–17, reference formulae and constants as pages 18–21, and steam tables from Thermodynamics and Heat Power are supplied. All eight questions are solved here.
Reference texts.
Granet & Bluestein, Thermodynamics and Heat Power, 6th ed. — steam tables, vapour and gas power cycles (the tables bound into this paper).
El-Wakil, Powerplant Technology — steam generators, gas-turbine and combined-cycle plant, wind and hydro conversion, plant siting and environmental impact.
Çengel & Boles, Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach, 9th ed. — regenerative Rankine cycles, Brayton-cycle modifications, isentropic and internal efficiencies.
Çengel & Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer — heat-recovery steam generator temperature profiles and pinch analysis.
Manwell, McGowan & Rogers, Wind Energy Explained, 2nd ed. — actuator-disc theory, the Betz limit and power coefficients.
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Renewable Energy Atlas, and CNSC REGDOC series — Canadian generation mix, siting and licensing context for Question 8.
The combustion balance of Question 1 returns a gas mass flow of 125.4 kg/s, which matches the 125 kg/s that Question 2 states. Readings taken from printed charts are identified explicitly wherever they occur.
Check: water and steam properties used below are IAPWS values, the formulation the bound Granet & Bluestein tables tabulate; every reading agrees with those tables to better than 0.1 %, comfortably inside the paper’s own rounding. Where a value had to be read off a printed chart (the Page 13 power curve and the Page 14 efficiency curves) the reading is stated explicitly and carries roughly ±1 % of graph-reading uncertainty. Every boxed result is recomputed from the question’s own data for this paper.
Given. A once-through counterflow heat-recovery steam generator raising superheated steam at a single pressure from gas-turbine exhaust.
Question 2 — given data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Gas inlet temperature
$T_{g,in}$
560 °C
Gas outlet temperature
$T_{g,out}$
130 °C
Feedwater inlet temperature
$T_{fw}$
30 °C
Steam outlet temperature
$T_{st}$
540 °C
Water and steam pressure
$p$
1.40 MPa
Gas mass flow rate
$M_{gas}$
125 kg/s
Specific heat, combustion gas
$c_{p,g}$
1.148 kJ/kg·K
Find. The temperature profile of the two streams, the enthalpies at the key states, the steam production, the pinch-point temperature difference, its design significance, and the physical arrangement of the heating surfaces.
Question 2(a) — temperature against path length. The gas cools monotonically from 560 °C to 130 °C; the water/steam line rises through the economiser, flattens at 195 °C through the evaporator, then rises again through the superheater. The two lines come closest at the economiser/evaporator junction — the pinch.
Approach. Take an overall energy balance on the whole generator to get the steam flow, then a partial balance on the superheater-plus-evaporator alone to locate the gas temperature at the point where the water first reaches saturation.
Part (a) — establish the shape of the profile. The gas is a single-phase stream of constant specific heat, so its temperature falls linearly with the heat surrendered. The water changes phase at constant pressure, so its line has three parts: sensible heating of liquid (economiser), evaporation at the saturation temperature (evaporator), and superheating (superheater). Numbering as on the figure: 1 gas in, 2 gas at the pinch, 3 gas out, 4 feedwater in, 5 saturated liquid, 6 saturated vapour, 7 steam out.
Part (b) — enthalpies at the key points. At 1.40 MPa the saturation temperature is 195.0 °C. The feedwater at 30 °C is compressed liquid, whose enthalpy is that of saturated liquid at 30 °C plus the small flow-work term $v(p-p_{sat}) \approx 1.4$ kJ/kg: $$h_4 = 127\ \text{kJ/kg},\quad h_5 = h_f = 830\ \text{kJ/kg},\quad h_6 = h_g = 2789\ \text{kJ/kg},\quad h_7 = 3562\ \text{kJ/kg}.$$ The latent heat at this pressure is $h_{fg} = 1959$ kJ/kg, which is the flat part of the cold-stream line.
Part (c) — overall energy balance gives the steam flow. All the heat given up by the gas is taken by the water: $$M_{gas}\,c_{p,g}\,(T_{g,in}-T_{g,out}) = M_{steam}\,(h_7-h_4).$$ The gas side releases $125 \times 1.148 \times (560-130) = 61\,705$ kW, and each kilogram of steam absorbs $3562 - 127 = 3435$ kJ, so $$\boxed{M_{steam} = \frac{61\,705}{3435} = 17.96\ \text{kg/s}}$$ which is consistent with the 20 kg/s assumed in Question 1 once the small heat loss and blowdown a real unit carries are allowed for.
Part (d) — locate the pinch. The pinch sits where the water first reaches saturation, because upstream of it the cold line is flat while the gas line keeps falling. Balance the superheater and evaporator together: $$M_{steam}\,(h_7-h_5) = M_{gas}\,c_{p,g}\,(T_{g,in}-T_{g,pinch}).$$ The duty above the pinch is $17.96 \times (3562-830) = 49\,079$ kW, and the gas capacity rate is $125 \times 1.148 = 143.5$ kW/K, so the gas cools by $49\,079/143.5 = 342.0$ K and reaches $$T_{g,pinch} = 560 - 342.0 = 218.0\ \text{°C}.$$ The water at that station is saturated liquid at 195.0 °C, so $$\boxed{\Delta T_{pinch} = 218.0 - 195.0 = 23.0\ \text{K}}$$
Confirm the profile closes. The economiser must then take the gas from 218.0 °C to the stated outlet. Its duty is $17.96 \times (830-127) = 12\,626$ kW, which cools the gas a further $12\,626/143.5 = 88.0$ K to exactly 130 °C. The profile is self-consistent and no temperature crossover occurs anywhere along it.
Part (e) — why the pinch governs the design. The pinch is the tightest approach anywhere in the exchanger, so it is the point that limits how much heat can be recovered and it sets the surface area required. Choosing it is a direct trade of capital against fuel. A small pinch — say 10 K — lets the evaporator start further down the gas path, so more steam is raised and the stack temperature falls, but the driving temperature difference at that station is small and the area needed to move the duty rises steeply, roughly as the reciprocal of the approach. A large pinch — say 40 K — makes the unit small and cheap but pushes heat up the stack unrecovered. Typical single-pressure HRSG practice lands at 15–25 K, which is where this unit sits. A second consequence matters operationally: because the pinch fixes the ratio of gas heat above and below the saturation temperature, it also fixes the steam flow, so the pinch chosen at design determines the bottoming-cycle output and cannot be improved later without adding surface.
Part (f) — the physical arrangement. The three surfaces are stacked in the gas path in the reverse order of the water flow, so that the hottest gas meets the hottest steam. Gas entering the top of the casing passes first over the superheater (7), then over the evaporator tubes (5–6), and finally over the economiser (4) before leaving at 130 °C. The steam drum sits outside the gas path at the top, connected to the evaporator bank by downcomers and risers; it separates the water and steam produced by natural circulation and delivers dry saturated steam to the superheater. Feedwater enters the economiser at the cold end and rises through the unit against the gas.
Question 2(f) — cross section of the heat recovery steam generator, labelled to match the key points on the temperature/path-length diagram.