22-Mec-B4 Integrated Manufacturing Systems · December 2019
Question 4 of 7: Present Value of Ownership, and the Rate of Return on a Copier
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 —
16-Mec-B4 Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Three hours, OPEN BOOK, any
non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven questions are printed and
any five constitute a complete paper; all questions are of equal value,
so each is worth 20 marks of the 100 available. Note 1 of the paper invites the
candidate to state any assumption made where a question is open to
interpretation, and this solution uses that licence wherever the source withholds
a datum. Every one of the seven questions is worked below, because the set is a
study resource rather than a three-hour sitting.
Find. (a) the present value at 15 per cent of all the costs of
owning and operating the computer for five years; (b) the unadjusted (accounting)
rate of return on the copier purchase, and the same return after the incremental
tax charge.
Question 4(a). Costs are drawn below the line and the salvage recovery above it. Every arrow must be moved to year 0 at 15 per cent before the amounts can be added.
Approach. Part (a) is a straight discounted present-worth
calculation — a single first cost, a five-year uniform series and a single
recovery at the end. Part (b) is deliberately the other kind of calculation: the
unadjusted rate of return is the accounting return, average annual income after
depreciation divided by the investment, with no discounting at all; the adjusted
figure is the same ratio after the incremental tax charge.
Part (a) — write the present value as three terms. Costs
are positive in this statement, and the salvage is a recovery, so
$$PV = P + A(P/A, i, n) - S(P/F, i, n)$$
with $P = 300{,}000$, $A = 100{,}000$, $S = 100{,}000$, $i = 0.15$ and $n = 5$, all
amounts in Canadian dollars.
Evaluate the two interest factors at 15 per cent for five
years. From the definitions,
$$(P/A, 15\%, 5) = \frac{1-(1.15)^{-5}}{0.15} = 3.35216,
\qquad (P/F, 15\%, 5) = (1.15)^{-5} = 0.49718$$
The salvage factor is worth noting on its own: at 15 per cent a dollar recovered
five years out is worth only 49.7 cents today, so the residual value is worth
barely half its face amount.
Substitute and total. Term by term,
$$A(P/A) = 100{,}000 \times 3.35216 = 335{,}216$$
$$S(P/F) = 100{,}000 \times 0.49718 = 49{,}718$$
$$PV = 300{,}000 + 335{,}216 - 49{,}718$$
$$\boxed{\ PV = 585{,}500\ \text{CAD}\ }$$
(585,498 before rounding). Re-adding the three components confirms the total. The
equivalent uniform annual cost is $585{,}498/3.35216 = 174{,}663$ CAD per year,
which is the figure to compare against the annual cost of the manual alternative
when the recommendation has to be made.
Note what the discounting is worth. The undiscounted arithmetic
sum of the same cash flows is
$300{,}000 + 5(100{,}000) - 100{,}000 = 700{,}000$ CAD; discounting at 15 per cent
reduces the figure by 114,500 CAD, or 16.4 per cent. Reporting the undiscounted
total would materially overstate the cost of ownership and, more importantly,
would misrank this option against alternatives with different timing.
Question 4(b). The relevant cash flows are the incremental ones: a 10,000 CAD outlay now against a 6,000 CAD annual saving and a 2,000 CAD residual.
Part (b) — establish what the copier actually saves. The
present arrangement costs the lease plus the per-page charge,
$$C_{\text{lease}} = 6{,}500 + 0.02 \times 50{,}000 = 6{,}500 + 1{,}000 = 7{,}500\ \text{CAD per year}$$
Owning costs 1,500 CAD per year in paper and maintenance, so the gross annual
saving before any charge for the machine itself is
$$\Delta = 7{,}500 - 1{,}500 = 6{,}000\ \text{CAD per year}$$
Charge depreciation to get an accounting income. The
unadjusted rate of return is an accounting measure, so the machine is
written off over its economic life on a straight-line basis,
$$d = \frac{P - S}{n} = \frac{10{,}000 - 2{,}000}{5} = 1{,}600\ \text{CAD per year}$$
and the average annual net income becomes
$$I = \Delta - d = 6{,}000 - 1{,}600 = 4{,}400\ \text{CAD per year}$$
Divide by the investment for part (i). On the original
investment,
$$\text{unadjusted rate of return} = \frac{I}{P} = \frac{4{,}400}{10{,}000}$$
$$\boxed{\ \text{unadjusted rate of return} = 44\ \text{per cent}\ }$$
The project is plainly attractive: it also pays the machine back out of gross
savings in $10{,}000/6{,}000 = 1.67$ years.
Deduct the incremental taxes for part (ii). The tax charge is
an operating outflow of the project, so it reduces the same numerator,
$$I_{\text{after tax}} = 4{,}400 - 1{,}000 = 3{,}400\ \text{CAD per year}$$
$$\boxed{\ \text{adjusted rate of return} = \frac{3{,}400}{10{,}000} = 34\ \text{per cent}\ }$$
Taxes take 22.7 per cent off the return but leave the decision unchanged.
Cross-check with a discounted rate of return. The accounting
measures above ignore timing, so it is worth confirming the conclusion with the
internal rate of return on the actual cash flows: an outlay of 10,000 now against
five annual receipts of $6{,}000-1{,}000 = 5{,}000$ and a 2,000 salvage. Solving
$-10{,}000 + 5{,}000(P/A,i,5) + 2{,}000(P/F,i,5) = 0$ gives $i = 43.1$ per cent
after tax, and 54.4 per cent before tax. The two families of measure agree that
this is a strongly positive project, which is the reassurance the cross-check is
for.
Check: the basis of the unadjusted rate of return is stated, because
the paper does not fix it. The figures above divide net income by the
original investment of 10,000 CAD, which is the more conservative and the
more common convention. If instead the average investment over the life is used,
$(10{,}000+2{,}000)/2 = 6{,}000$ CAD, the same incomes give 73.3 per cent
unadjusted and 56.7 per cent adjusted. The method and the conclusion are identical
either way; only the basis of the denominator differs, so state which is used
— that is what Note 1 of the paper asks for. A second reading worth naming:
the 1,000 CAD of incremental taxes is treated as an annual charge; if it were a
one-time charge the after-tax income would be 3,400 CAD in year 1 only and 4,400
CAD thereafter.