NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics · December 2013

Question 3 of 7: Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Converging Nozzle Discharging Oxygen — Mass Flow at Three Back Pressures

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2013 — 07-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Part A holds four questions weighted 16 marks each (48 per cent of the paper) and Part B three questions weighted 26 marks each (52 per cent); the candidate answers any three in Part A and any two in Part B. All seven questions are worked here. The paper supplies a four-page aid sheet (compressible-flow and shock relations, the boundary-layer integral equations, the Navier–Stokes equations in Cartesian and cylindrical-polar form, and the potential-flow stream and potential functions); every relation quoted below is taken from that sheet, so the arithmetic matches what a candidate had in front of them.

Reference texts.

Conventions used throughout. Air is treated as a perfect gas with γ = 1.4 and R = 287 J/kg·K except where a question names another gas. Pressure conversions use 1 mm Hg = 133.322 Pa and 1 mm H2O = 9.80665 Pa. Compressible-flow ratios are evaluated from the closed-form aid-sheet relations rather than read off a table, so the third significant figure is exact rather than interpolated.

Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Converging Nozzle Discharging Oxygen — Mass Flow at Three Back Pressures (16 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
Nozzle exit areaAe1.0 cm2 = 1.0 × 10−4 m2
Stagnation pressureP0500 kPa
Stagnation temperatureT01200 K
Gasoxygenγ = 1.4, R = 259.8 J/kg·K
Back pressures to examinePb0, 250 and 400 kPa
Nozzle shapepurely converging ⇒ Me can never exceed 1

Find. The mass flow rate delivered at each of the three back pressures.

01002003004005000.020.040.06back pressure Pb (kPa)mass flow rate (kg/s)P* = 264.1 kPa(choking limit)choked branch: Me = 1, flow rate fixedsubsonic branch:Pe = Pb0 kPa250 kPa400 kPaConverging nozzle, oxygen: P0 = 500 kPa, T0 = 1200 K, Ae = 1.0 cm2
Figure A3 — Mass flow versus back pressure for the converging nozzle. Below the critical pressure P* the exit is choked and the curve is flat; above it the exit is subsonic and the flow falls to zero at Pb = P0.

Approach. A converging nozzle can at most reach sonic conditions at its exit, so the whole question turns on one comparison: is the back pressure above or below the critical (choking) pressure? Compute that threshold first, then evaluate the aid-sheet mass-flow relation with the appropriate exit Mach number for each case.

  1. Establish the critical pressure that separates the two regimes. Setting $M_e=1$ in the isentropic pressure ratio gives the choking threshold $$\frac{P^{*}}{P_0}=\left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)^{\frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1}} =\left(\frac{1}{1.2}\right)^{3.5}=0.52828,$$ so $$\boxed{\ P^{*}=0.52828\times500=264.1\ \text{kPa}\ }$$ Any back pressure below 264.1 kPa chokes the nozzle; any back pressure above it leaves the exit subsonic with $P_e=P_b$.
  2. Evaluate the choked (maximum) mass flow rate. The aid-sheet relation $$\dot m=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma}{R}}\;\frac{P_0}{\sqrt{T_0}}\,M \left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^{2}\right)^{-\frac{\gamma+1}{2(\gamma-1)}}A$$ at $M=1$ collapses to $$\dot m_{\max}=\sqrt{\frac{1.4}{259.8}}\times\frac{500\,000}{\sqrt{1200}}\times (1.2)^{-3}\times1.0\times10^{-4} =0.073408\times14\,434\times0.57870\times10^{-4},$$ giving $$\boxed{\ \dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}=61.3\ \text{g/s}\ }$$ The corresponding throat state is $T^{*}=T_0/1.2=1000\ \text{K}$ and $V^{*}=\sqrt{\gamma RT^{*}}=603\ \text{m/s}$; multiplying by $\rho^{*}=P^{*}/RT^{*}=1.017\ \text{kg/m}^{3}$ and the area reproduces the same 0.0613 kg/s, which confirms the exponent arithmetic.
  3. Case Pb = 0 (discharge to vacuum). Zero back pressure is far below the 264.1 kPa threshold, so the nozzle is choked. The exit plane holds $P_e=P^{*}=264.1\ \text{kPa}$, not zero — the remaining expansion to vacuum happens outside the nozzle in an under-expanded plume of oblique waves, which the nozzle cannot feel because no downstream signal can travel upstream through a sonic throat. Therefore $$\dot m=\dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}.$$
  4. Case Pb = 250 kPa. Still below 264.1 kPa, so the nozzle is again choked and the answer is unchanged: $$\dot m=\dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}.$$ The nozzle is only 5 per cent under-expanded here, but "choked" is a yes-or-no condition; being marginally below the threshold delivers exactly the same flow as discharging to vacuum.
  5. Case Pb = 400 kPa — find the subsonic exit Mach number. Now $P_b>P^{*}$, so the exit is subsonic and the exit static pressure equals the back pressure, $P_e=400\ \text{kPa}$. Inverting the isentropic relation, $$\begin{aligned} M_e&=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma-1}\left[\left(\frac{P_0}{P_e}\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}-1\right]}\\ &=\sqrt{5\left[(1.25)^{0.28571}-1\right]}=\sqrt{5\times0.065831}=0.5737 \end{aligned}$$
  6. Evaluate the mass flow for the subsonic case. Substituting $M_e=0.5737$ into the same aid-sheet relation, $$\dot m=0.073408\times14\,434\times0.5737\times(1.06583)^{-3}\times1.0\times10^{-4},$$ so $$\boxed{\ \dot m=0.0502\ \text{kg/s}=50.2\ \text{g/s}\ }$$ which is 82 per cent of the choked value. The exit conditions are $T_e=T_0/1.06583=1126\ \text{K}$ and $V_e=M_e\sqrt{\gamma RT_e}=367\ \text{m/s}$; a direct check gives $\rho_e V_e A_e=(400\,000/(259.8\times1126))\times367\times10^{-4}=0.0502\ \text{kg/s}$, matching.
Back pressure PbRegime Exit Mach MeExit pressure Pe Mass flow rate
0choked (under-expanded)1.000264.1 kPa0.0613 kg/s
250 kPachoked (under-expanded)1.000264.1 kPa0.0613 kg/s
400 kPasubsonic0.574400 kPa0.0502 kg/s
Critical (choking) pressureP* = 264.1 kPa