22-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics · December 2013
Question 3 of 7: Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Converging Nozzle Discharging Oxygen — Mass Flow at Three Back Pressures
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2013 — 07-Mec-B6
Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, open book, any
non-communicating calculator permitted. Part A holds four questions weighted 16 marks each
(48 per cent of the paper) and Part B three questions weighted 26 marks each
(52 per cent); the candidate answers any three in Part A and any two in Part B.
All seven questions are worked here. The paper supplies a four-page aid sheet
(compressible-flow and shock relations, the boundary-layer integral equations, the
Navier–Stokes equations in Cartesian and cylindrical-polar form, and the potential-flow
stream and potential functions); every relation quoted below is taken from that sheet, so the
arithmetic matches what a candidate had in front of them.
Reference texts.
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — Ch. 5 (dimensional analysis and
similitude, turbomachine coefficients), Ch. 8 (potential flow and the method of images),
Ch. 9 (compressible duct flow, normal shocks, Fanno flow), Ch. 11 (turbomachinery).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations: film flows, rotating containers).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — Ch. 3 (normal shock
waves), Ch. 5 (quasi-one-dimensional nozzle flow, supersonic wind tunnels).
R. W. Fox, P. J. Pritchard and A. T. McDonald, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,
10th ed. — Ch. 7 (similitude), Ch. 10 (fluid machinery), Ch. 12–13
(compressible flow).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen and D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
Ch. 6 (ideal flow, images), Ch. 9 (laminar flow).
Conventions used throughout. Air is treated as a
perfect gas with γ = 1.4 and R = 287 J/kg·K
except where a question names another gas. Pressure conversions use
1 mm Hg = 133.322 Pa and 1 mm H2O = 9.80665 Pa.
Compressible-flow ratios are evaluated from the closed-form aid-sheet relations rather than
read off a table, so the third significant figure is exact rather than interpolated.
Question 3 (Part A, Question A3): Converging Nozzle Discharging Oxygen — Mass Flow at Three Back Pressures (16 marks)
Find. The mass flow rate delivered at each of the three back pressures.
Figure A3 — Mass flow versus back pressure for the converging nozzle. Below the critical pressure P* the exit is choked and the curve is flat; above it the exit is subsonic and the flow falls to zero at Pb = P0.
Approach. A converging nozzle can at most reach sonic conditions at
its exit, so the whole question turns on one comparison: is the back pressure above or below
the critical (choking) pressure? Compute that threshold first, then evaluate the aid-sheet
mass-flow relation with the appropriate exit Mach number for each case.
Establish the critical pressure that separates the two regimes. Setting
$M_e=1$ in the isentropic pressure ratio gives the choking threshold
$$\frac{P^{*}}{P_0}=\left(\frac{2}{\gamma+1}\right)^{\frac{\gamma}{\gamma-1}}
=\left(\frac{1}{1.2}\right)^{3.5}=0.52828,$$
so
$$\boxed{\ P^{*}=0.52828\times500=264.1\ \text{kPa}\ }$$
Any back pressure below 264.1 kPa chokes the nozzle; any back pressure above it leaves the
exit subsonic with $P_e=P_b$.
Evaluate the choked (maximum) mass flow rate. The aid-sheet relation
$$\dot m=\sqrt{\frac{\gamma}{R}}\;\frac{P_0}{\sqrt{T_0}}\,M
\left(1+\frac{\gamma-1}{2}M^{2}\right)^{-\frac{\gamma+1}{2(\gamma-1)}}A$$
at $M=1$ collapses to
$$\dot m_{\max}=\sqrt{\frac{1.4}{259.8}}\times\frac{500\,000}{\sqrt{1200}}\times
(1.2)^{-3}\times1.0\times10^{-4}
=0.073408\times14\,434\times0.57870\times10^{-4},$$
giving
$$\boxed{\ \dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}=61.3\ \text{g/s}\ }$$
The corresponding throat state is $T^{*}=T_0/1.2=1000\ \text{K}$ and
$V^{*}=\sqrt{\gamma RT^{*}}=603\ \text{m/s}$; multiplying by
$\rho^{*}=P^{*}/RT^{*}=1.017\ \text{kg/m}^{3}$ and the area reproduces the same 0.0613 kg/s,
which confirms the exponent arithmetic.
Case Pb = 0 (discharge to vacuum). Zero back pressure is far
below the 264.1 kPa threshold, so the nozzle is choked. The exit plane holds
$P_e=P^{*}=264.1\ \text{kPa}$, not zero — the remaining expansion to vacuum happens
outside the nozzle in an under-expanded plume of oblique waves, which the nozzle cannot feel
because no downstream signal can travel upstream through a sonic throat. Therefore
$$\dot m=\dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}.$$
Case Pb = 250 kPa. Still below 264.1 kPa, so the nozzle is
again choked and the answer is unchanged:
$$\dot m=\dot m_{\max}=0.0613\ \text{kg/s}.$$
The nozzle is only 5 per cent under-expanded here, but "choked" is a yes-or-no
condition; being marginally below the threshold delivers exactly the same flow as discharging
to vacuum.
Case Pb = 400 kPa — find the subsonic exit Mach number.
Now $P_b>P^{*}$, so the exit is subsonic and the exit static pressure equals the back
pressure, $P_e=400\ \text{kPa}$. Inverting the isentropic relation,
$$\begin{aligned}
M_e&=\sqrt{\frac{2}{\gamma-1}\left[\left(\frac{P_0}{P_e}\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{\gamma}}-1\right]}\\
&=\sqrt{5\left[(1.25)^{0.28571}-1\right]}=\sqrt{5\times0.065831}=0.5737
\end{aligned}$$
Evaluate the mass flow for the subsonic case. Substituting
$M_e=0.5737$ into the same aid-sheet relation,
$$\dot m=0.073408\times14\,434\times0.5737\times(1.06583)^{-3}\times1.0\times10^{-4},$$
so
$$\boxed{\ \dot m=0.0502\ \text{kg/s}=50.2\ \text{g/s}\ }$$
which is 82 per cent of the choked value. The exit conditions are
$T_e=T_0/1.06583=1126\ \text{K}$ and $V_e=M_e\sqrt{\gamma RT_e}=367\ \text{m/s}$; a direct check
gives $\rho_e V_e A_e=(400\,000/(259.8\times1126))\times367\times10^{-4}=0.0502\ \text{kg/s}$,
matching.