Question 4 of 6: Vertical annulus with a shear-free outer wall
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2016 —
07-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics. Three hours, OPEN BOOK, any
approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions are printed; any five
of them constitute a complete paper, each carries an equal 20 marks, and the item weights
are shown in the left margin. No aid sheet is bound into this paper — the open-book rule is the candidate’s table source, so every compressible-flow ratio below is quoted in closed form rather than read off a chart. All six questions are solved here.
Reference texts. Solutions follow the conventions of the texts the
EGBC syllabus recommends for this subject:
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — potential-flow building blocks
(§4.4, §8.2–8.3), laminar boundary layers and the momentum integral
(§7.2–7.4), dimensional analysis (§5.2–5.4), compressible duct
flow (§9.5–9.7).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates (§3.2–3.4) and
integral boundary-layer methods (§4.5).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — quasi-one-dimensional
nozzle flow, normal shocks and Fanno flow (Ch. 3, Ch. 5).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen & D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
complex potential, images and the Blasius/Lagally force theorems (Ch. 6); boundary
layers (Ch. 9).
B. R. Munson et al., Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. —
Buckingham Pi method and the repeating-variable procedure (Ch. 7).
Question 4: Vertical annulus with a shear-free outer wall (20 marks)
Given. A vertical annulus of outer radius R and inner rod
radius δ = R/4, length L with L/R ≫ 10; the outer
pipe wall Teflon-coated so it carries negligible shear, the inner rod uncoated so the no-slip
condition applies there; both walls non-porous; inlet and outlet both open to atmosphere so
the static pressures are equal; steady, laminar, axisymmetric flow of water of density ρ
and dynamic viscosity μ. From Figure 4, z is measured downward,
in the direction of gravity and of the flow.
Find.vr(r), vz(r),
and the magnitude and direction of the force per unit length that the water exerts on the
inner rod.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 4 (redrawn) with the resulting velocity profile. The no-slip rod pins the velocity to zero at r = δ; the shear-free coated wall forces d v z /d r = 0 at r = R , so the maximum migrates all the way out to the coated surface. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Continuity plus the non-porous walls kills the radial
component outright. The sentence about both ends being open to atmosphere is load-bearing
rather than decorative — it makes dP/dz = 0, so gravity is the only
driver, and the z-momentum equation reduces to a balance between the viscous stress
gradient and the weight of the fluid.
Part (a) — the radial velocity. For steady axisymmetric flow with
no swirl, continuity reads
$$\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial\left(r v_{r}\right)}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial v_{z}}{\partial z}=0 .$$
With L/R ≫ 10 the flow is fully developed, so
∂vz/∂z = 0 and therefore
rvr = constant. The walls are non-porous, so
vr(δ) = 0, which forces that constant to be zero:
$$\boxed{\;v_{r}(r)=0\ \ \text{everywhere in }\ \delta\le r\le R\;}$$
The result is worth stating explicitly rather than assumed, because it is what licenses every
simplification that follows.
Establish the driving term. Both ends of the pipe are exposed to the
atmosphere at the same static pressure, so along the axis
$$\frac{dP}{dz}=\frac{P_{\text{out}}-P_{\text{in}}}{L}=0 .$$
The flow is therefore driven purely by gravity. With z pointing downward as in
Figure 4, the body force is +ρg in the z direction.
Part (b) — reduce the z-momentum equation. Everything
convective vanishes (vr = 0 and
∂vz/∂z = 0), leaving
$$\frac{\mu}{r}\frac{d}{dr}\left(r\frac{dv_{z}}{dr}\right)+\rho g=0 .$$
Integrating once,
$$r\frac{dv_{z}}{dr}=-\frac{\rho g r^{2}}{2\mu}+C_{1},$$
and again,
$$v_{z}(r)=-\frac{\rho g r^{2}}{4\mu}+C_{1}\ln r+C_{2}.$$
Apply the two boundary conditions. The Teflon-coated outer wall carries
negligible shear, so dvz/dr = 0 at r = R:
$$-\frac{\rho g R}{2\mu}+\frac{C_{1}}{R}=0\quad\Longrightarrow\quad C_{1}=\frac{\rho g R^{2}}{2\mu}.$$
No slip on the uncoated rod, vz(δ) = 0, then fixes
C2. Collecting terms,
$$\boxed{\;v_{z}(r)=\frac{\rho g}{4\mu}\left(\delta^{2}-r^{2}\right)
+\frac{\rho g R^{2}}{2\mu}\ln\!\frac{r}{\delta}\;}$$
which is a parabola plus a logarithm — the logarithm being the fingerprint of the
annular geometry.
Locate and size the maximum. Since the shear vanishes only at
r = R, the velocity maximum sits at the coated wall rather than
somewhere inside the gap. Putting δ = R/4,
$$v_{z,\max}=v_{z}(R)=\frac{\rho g R^{2}}{\mu}\left[\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{1}{16}-1\right)
+\frac{1}{2}\ln 4\right]=0.4588\,\frac{\rho g R^{2}}{\mu}.$$
The profile therefore climbs monotonically from zero at the rod to its peak at the pipe wall,
the opposite of the familiar pipe profile and a direct consequence of which surface was
coated.
Part (c) — wall shear on the rod. Differentiating and evaluating at
r = δ,
$$\tau_{\delta}=\mu\left.\frac{dv_{z}}{dr}\right|_{r=\delta}
=-\frac{\rho g\delta}{2}+\frac{\rho g R^{2}}{2\delta}=\frac{\rho g}{2\delta}\left(R^{2}-\delta^{2}\right).$$
The force per unit length follows by multiplying by the rod perimeter 2πδ:
$$F'=2\pi\delta\,\tau_{\delta}=\pi\rho g\left(R^{2}-\delta^{2}\right),$$
and with δ = R/4,
$$\boxed{\;F'=\frac{15}{16}\pi\rho g R^{2}\ \ \text{per unit length, directed DOWNWARD (with the flow)}\;}$$
The free global check. A shear-free wall transmits no axial force, so the
rod must be carrying the entire weight of the water column. The weight per unit length of the
annulus is ρgπ(R2 − δ2), which is
exactly the expression obtained above. That agreement is not a coincidence to be admired but
a check to be run: any algebraic slip in C1 or C2
breaks it immediately.
Put numbers on it, and check the laminar premise. Water at 20 °C
(ρ = 998 kg/m3, μ = 1.002 × 10−3 Pa·s) in an
annulus with R = 0.5 mm gives
$$v_{z,\max}=1.12\ \text{m/s},\qquad \bar V=0.909\ \text{m/s},\qquad
F'=7.21\times 10^{-3}\ \text{N/m},$$
with a hydraulic-diameter Reynolds number
ρV̄Dh/μ = 679 — comfortably laminar, as the
question requires.
Part
Quantity
Result
(a)
Radial velocity
vr(r) = 0 throughout
(b)
Axial velocity
vz(r) = ρg(δ2 − r2)/4μ + (ρgR2/2μ) ln(r/δ)
(b)
Peak velocity (at r = R, δ = R/4)
0.4588 ρgR2/μ
(c)
Shear stress on the rod
τ = ρg(R2 − δ2)/2δ = 7.5 ρgR/2
(c)
Force per unit length on the rod
(15/16)πρgR2, directed downward
—
Illustrative case, R = 0.5 mm water
vmax = 1.12 m/s, F′ = 7.21 mN/m, ReDh = 679
Check: the laminar assumption is the question’s
own premise, but it constrains the geometry hard. Because
vmax ∝ ρgR2/μ, water stays laminar only at
capillary scale — hence the R = 0.5 mm illustration above. At a laboratory
scale of R = 10 mm the same formulae need a viscous oil
(ρ = 890 kg/m3, μ = 0.40 Pa·s) to keep the flow laminar, giving
vmax = 1.00 m/s. The algebra of parts (a)–(c) is unaffected.