NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics · December 2018

Question 2 of 8: Compressor Blade Angles

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format: National Examinations, December 2018 — 16-Mec-B6 Fluid Machinery. Closed book, three hours, 22 pages. Section A is calculative (Questions 1–5) and Section B descriptive (Questions 6–8); candidates answer four questions from Section A and two from Section B — six questions of ten marks each, 60 marks in all. Reference data for individual questions are supplied on pages 11–17, and the nomenclature, general constants and reference equations on pages 18–22. All eight questions are solved below.

Check — angle conventions are taken from the paper's own attachments, and they are not the same across the paper. The compressor velocity diagram on page 11 strikes $\alpha_1$ and $\beta_1$ off the axial component $C_{X1}$, so every blade and vane angle in Questions 1 and 2 is measured from the axial direction. The steam-turbine diagram on page 16 strikes $\theta$, $\phi$, $\gamma$ and $\delta$ off the tangential (blade-motion) direction, and the Francis diagram on page 15 defines $\alpha_1$ between $V_1$ and $u_1$ — also tangential. Questions 4 and 5 therefore use the tangential reference. Every constant below is the paper's own page-19 value: $g = 9.81\ \text{m}\,\text{s}^{-2}$, $\rho_{\text{water}} = 1000\ \text{kg}\,\text{m}^{-3}$, $c_p = 1005\ \text{J}\,\text{kg}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}$ and $c_v = 718\ \text{J}\,\text{kg}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}$, from which $R = c_p - c_v = 287\ \text{J}\,\text{kg}^{-1}\text{K}^{-1}$ and $k = c_p/c_v = 1.3997$ — not a textbook 1.40.

Reference texts



Question 2 — Compressor Blade Angles (10 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given.

QuantitySymbolValue
LP rotational speed$N$$6500\ \text{rev/min}$
First-stage blade tip and hub diameters$D_t$, $D_h$$1.12\ \text{m}$, $0.38\ \text{m}$
Axial (inlet) air velocity, no prewhirl$C_X$$184\ \text{m/s}$
Air temperature entering the first stage$T_1$$80\ {}^{\circ}\text{C} = 353.15\ \text{K}$
Air mass flow rate$\dot m$$116\ \text{kg/s}$
LP spool: stages, pressure ratio, efficiency$n_{LP}$, $r_{LP}$, $\eta_{is}$7, 3.0, 0.90

Find. Blade speeds at tip and root, the first-stage exit temperature, the specific work and the whirl components $C_{Y1}$ and $C_{Y2}$ at both radii, the inlet and outlet relative-flow (blade) angles from the scale diagrams, and a check of those angles against the photograph of the real blades.

Approach. Get the blade speeds from the rotational speed and the two diameters; take the stage temperature rise as one seventh of the whole LP rise computed in Question 1; convert that rise to specific work and invert Euler's equation to find the exit whirl at each radius; then close the velocity triangles with the axial velocity held constant.

  1. Blade velocity at tip and root (part a). The angular velocity of the LP spool is $$\omega = \frac{2\pi N}{60} = \frac{2\pi \times 6500}{60} = 680.68\ \text{rad/s}$$ and the peripheral speed at any radius is $U = \omega r$, so $$\boxed{U_{\text{tip}} = 680.68 \times \tfrac{1.12}{2} = 381.2\ \text{m/s}\qquad U_{\text{hub}} = 680.68 \times \tfrac{0.38}{2} = 129.3\ \text{m/s}}$$ The tip runs at nearly three times the root speed, which is the whole reason a first-stage blade has to be twisted.
  2. Temperature at the exit of the first stage (part b). Question 1 established that the whole LP spool raises the air by $\Delta T_{LP} = 144.60\ \text{K}$. Sharing that equally between the seven stages, $$\Delta T_{\text{stage}} = \frac{144.60}{7} = 20.66\ \text{K}$$ $$\boxed{T_{\text{exit,1}} = 353.15 + 20.66 = 373.8\ \text{K} = 100.7\ {}^{\circ}\text{C}}$$ A rise of about 21 K in one stage is a heavy but realistic loading for a transonic first stage of this era.
  3. Specific work of the stage (part c). The stage is adiabatic, so all the work appears as stagnation enthalpy rise, and with the axial velocity unchanged through the rotor the static rise is the whole of it: $$w = c_p\,\Delta T_{\text{stage}} = 1005 \times 20.66 = 20\,761\ \text{J/kg} = 20.76\ \text{kJ/kg}$$
  4. Whirl components at tip and root (part c continued). The paper states there is no prewhirl, so the absolute velocity at inlet is purely axial and $C_{Y1} = 0$ at every radius. Euler's compressor equation, in the page-21 form $w = U(C_{Y2}-C_{Y1})$, then gives the exit whirl directly. The work is the same at both radii — the stage is designed for constant work along the span — so the whirl varies inversely with blade speed: $$C_{Y2,\text{tip}} = \frac{20\,761}{381.2} = 54.5\ \text{m/s},\qquad C_{Y2,\text{hub}} = \frac{20\,761}{129.3} = 160.5\ \text{m/s}$$ $$\boxed{C_{Y1} = 0 \text{ at both radii};\quad C_{Y2,\text{tip}} = 54.5\ \text{m/s},\quad C_{Y2,\text{hub}} = 160.5\ \text{m/s}}$$ The product $C_{Y2}\,r$ is the same at both radii (30.5 and 30.5 m²/s), which is the free-vortex condition — a useful check that the constant-work assumption has been applied consistently.
  5. Velocity diagrams and blade angles at the tip (part d). The axial component is held at $C_X = 184\ \text{m/s}$ because no exit annulus is given. All angles are measured from the axial direction, following the page-11 attachment. At inlet the relative velocity closes the triangle between the axial absolute velocity and the blade speed: $$\begin{aligned}\beta_1 &= \arctan\!\left(\frac{U}{C_X}\right) = \arctan\!\left(\frac{381.2}{184}\right) = 64.2^{\circ} \\ W_1 &= \sqrt{184^2 + 381.2^2} = 423.3\ \text{m/s}\end{aligned}$$ At exit the relative whirl is what is left of the blade speed after the air has been given its own whirl, $W_{Y2} = U - C_{Y2} = 381.2 - 54.5 = 326.7\ \text{m/s}$, so $$\beta_2 = \arctan\!\left(\frac{326.7}{184}\right) = 60.6^{\circ},\qquad W_2 = 375.0\ \text{m/s},\qquad C_2 = 191.9\ \text{m/s}$$ The de Haller number is $W_2/W_1 = 375.0/423.3 = 0.886$, comfortably above the 0.72 diffusion limit, so the tip section is lightly loaded.
  6. First-stage rotor at the TIP (U = 381.2 m/s)C1W1UW2C2U
    Combined velocity diagram for the first-stage rotor at the tip. Inlet triangle above the blade-speed line, outlet below. The turning of the relative flow, from 64.2° to 60.6° off the axial direction, is only 3.6°: at this blade speed a very small deflection buys the whole stage work.
  7. The same construction at the root. Nothing changes except the blade speed, but its effect is dramatic: $$\beta_1 = \arctan\!\left(\frac{129.3}{184}\right) = 35.1^{\circ},\qquad W_1 = 224.9\ \text{m/s}$$ and at exit $W_{Y2} = U - C_{Y2} = 129.3 - 160.5 = -31.2\ \text{m/s}$, a negative relative whirl, so $$\beta_2 = \arctan\!\left(\frac{-31.2}{184}\right) = -9.6^{\circ}$$ that is, 9.6° on the other side of the axial direction. The relative flow leaves the root section pointing slightly into the direction of blade motion. Collecting the diagram values, $W_2 = 186.6\ \text{m/s}$, $C_2 = 244.2\ \text{m/s}$, $\alpha_2 = 41.1^{\circ}$, and the de Haller number is $186.6/224.9 = 0.830$, still acceptable.
  8. First-stage rotor at the HUB (U = 129.3 m/s)C1W1UW2C2U
    Combined velocity diagram at the hub. The inlet stagger is far smaller than at the tip (35.1° against 64.2°), and the exit relative velocity crosses to the other side of the axial line because the required whirl exceeds the local blade speed.
  9. Comparison with the photograph of the real blades (part e). The page-12 photograph of the Olympus 593 first-stage LP blades shows exactly the feature the calculation predicts: a pronounced twist from root to tip, with the leading edges near the tip lying almost along the plane of rotation — that is, staggered some 60–65° from the axial direction — while the root sections are much closer to axial, around 35°. The calculated inlet angles of 64.2° at the tip and 35.1° at the root are therefore reasonably correct, and the direction of the twist (large stagger outboard, small stagger inboard) matches the photograph without ambiguity. The calculated blade camber is small, and this too is visible: the blades are thin and only gently curved, consistent with a few degrees of turning. The one feature the photograph does not support is the negative exit angle at the root, which is discussed in the note below.

Check — the constant-work assumption over-loads the root, and the paper's own data force it. At the hub the design demands $C_{Y2} = 160.5\ \text{m/s}$ against a blade speed of only $129.3\ \text{m/s}$, so the air must leave the root with more whirl than the blade itself has. Kinematically the triangle still closes — the relative flow simply exits with a small forward lean, giving $\beta_2 = -9.6^{\circ}$ — but a blade whose trailing edge points into the direction of rotation is not something a real axial compressor carries, and the photograph shows no such feature. The physical resolution is that a real design does not hold the work constant right down to the root: with a hub-to-tip ratio of only $0.38/1.12 = 0.34$ the work is graded down towards the hub (a forced-vortex or mixed-vortex distribution) so that $C_{Y2}$ stays below $U$ everywhere. The values above are the ones the question's stated assumptions produce and are reported as such; the diffusion check is not the binding constraint here (both de Haller numbers pass), the whirl-versus-blade-speed check is.

QuantityTipHub (root)
Blade velocity $U$$381.2\ \text{m/s}$$129.3\ \text{m/s}$
Stage exit temperature $T_{\text{exit},1}$$373.8\ \text{K}$ ($100.7\ {}^{\circ}\text{C}$)
Specific work $w$$20\,761\ \text{J/kg}$ ($20.76\ \text{kJ/kg}$)
Inlet whirl $C_{Y1}$$0$$0$
Outlet whirl $C_{Y2}$$54.5\ \text{m/s}$$160.5\ \text{m/s}$
Inlet blade angle $\beta_1$ (from axial)$64.2^{\circ}$$35.1^{\circ}$
Outlet blade angle $\beta_2$ (from axial)$60.6^{\circ}$$-9.6^{\circ}$
Relative velocities $W_1$ / $W_2$$423.3$ / $375.0\ \text{m/s}$$224.9$ / $186.6\ \text{m/s}$
de Haller number $W_2/W_1$$0.886$$0.830$