22-Mec-B6 Advanced Fluid Mechanics · Undated paper
Question 6 of 6: Drag on a plate standing inside a turbulent boundary layer
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2019 —
printed code 16-Mec-A6Advanced Fluid Mechanics (the cover page and every running header read 16-Mec-A6, May 2019). Three hours, OPEN BOOK, any approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions are printed; any five of them constitute a complete paper for 100 marks, each question carries an equal 20 marks, and the item weights are printed in the left margin. No aid sheet is bound into the paper — the open-book rule is the candidate’s table source, so every compressible-flow ratio below is quoted in closed form rather than read from a chart. All six questions are solved here.
Reference texts. Solutions follow the conventions of the texts the EGBC syllabus
recommends for this subject:
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 8th ed. — control-volume momentum (§3.4),
potential-flow building blocks (§4.4, §8.2–8.3), dimensional analysis and
modelling (§5.2–5.4), turbulent flat-plate layers (§7.4), isentropic and
normal-shock relations (§9.3–9.5).
J. D. Anderson, Modern Compressible Flow, 3rd ed. — quasi-one-dimensional
nozzle flow and normal shocks (Ch. 3 and Ch. 5).
F. M. White, Viscous Fluid Flow, 3rd ed. — exact solutions of the
Navier–Stokes equations (§3.2).
P. K. Kundu, I. M. Cohen & D. R. Dowling, Fluid Mechanics, 6th ed. —
complex potential and plane potential flows (Ch. 6); boundary layers (Ch. 9).
R. W. Fox, A. T. McDonald & J. W. Mitchell, Introduction to Fluid Mechanics,
10th ed. — momentum analysis of pipe bends (Ch. 4) and similitude (Ch. 7).
SI units throughout. Air and mercury properties are those printed in the question; all pressures
are absolute unless a gauge value is stated explicitly. Water and air properties not printed in the
paper are taken from the standard Canadian-edition property tables at the stated temperatures, and
each such value is named where it is used.
Question 6: Drag on a plate standing inside a turbulent boundary layer (20 marks)
Given. A thin plate of streamwise length $L$ and height exactly $\delta$, standing
edge-on to a wall so that both of its faces are wetted, and sitting entirely inside a fully turbulent
boundary layer of thickness $\delta$ whose profile is $u(y) = U_\infty (y/\delta)^{1/7}$. The fluid has
density $\rho$ and kinematic viscosity $\nu$. The plate's top edge coincides with the edge of the
boundary layer, so it sees the full range of the profile from $u = 0$ at the wall to
$u = U_\infty$ at $y = \delta$.
Find. A closed-form drag coefficient for the plate, and the ratio of that drag to
the drag the same plate would feel in a uniform stream of speed $U_\infty$.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 6 (redrawn). Each horizontal strip $dy$ of the plate is treated as its own two-sided flat plate of length $L$ immersed in a uniform stream of the local speed $u(y)$, and the strips are integrated over $0 \le y \le \delta$. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Treat each horizontal strip of the plate as an independent two-sided flat
plate at its own local free-stream speed $u(y)$ and hence its own local Reynolds number, apply the
standard turbulent flat-plate friction law to each strip, and integrate over the plate height. The
whole derivation collapses to one power integral.
Write the friction law for a single strip. The average friction coefficient for one
side of a smooth flat plate in a fully turbulent layer, obtained by integrating the local law
$C_{f,x} = 0.0266\,Re_x^{-1/7}$ from the leading edge, is
$$C_D = \frac{7}{6}(0.0266)\,Re_L^{-1/7} = 0.031\,Re_L^{-1/7}$$
A strip of height $dy$ at elevation $y$ has wetted area $2L\,dy$ (two faces) and sees the local speed
$u(y)$, so its own Reynolds number is $Re_L(y) = u(y)L/\nu$ and its drag is
$$dF = 2\left[0.031\left(\frac{u L}{\nu}\right)^{-1/7}\right]\frac{\rho u^{2}}{2}\,L\,dy
= 0.031\,\rho\,L\left(\frac{\nu}{L}\right)^{1/7} u^{13/7}\,dy$$
The exponent is the key structural result: the $u^{2}$ of the dynamic pressure is reduced by the
$u^{-1/7}$ of the friction law, leaving $2-\tfrac17 = \tfrac{13}{7}$.
Substitute the profile and integrate over the height. With
$u(y) = U_\infty (y/\delta)^{1/7}$ the velocity raised to the thirteen-sevenths power is
$u^{13/7} = U_\infty^{13/7}(y/\delta)^{13/49}$, and the plate spans the full layer, $0 \le y \le \delta$:
$$\int_{0}^{\delta}\left(\frac{y}{\delta}\right)^{13/49} dy
= \delta \cdot \frac{1}{1+\tfrac{13}{49}} = \frac{49}{62}\,\delta = 0.7903\,\delta$$
so the total drag is
$$F_D = 0.031\,\rho\,L^{6/7}\,\nu^{1/7}\,U_\infty^{13/7}\;\frac{49}{62}\,\delta$$
Note that this is an ordinary power integral, not a boundary-layer integration — the
momentum-integral machinery is not needed and never enters.
Non-dimensionalise to get the drag coefficient (part a). Referring the drag to the
total wetted area $A = 2L\delta$ and the free-stream dynamic pressure,
$$C_D \equiv \frac{F_D}{\tfrac12 \rho U_\infty^{2}\,(2L\delta)}
= 0.031 \cdot \frac{49}{62}\left(\frac{\nu}{U_\infty L}\right)^{1/7}$$
$$\boxed{C_D = \frac{49}{62}\,(0.031)\,Re_L^{-1/7} = 0.0245\,Re_L^{-1/7},
\qquad Re_L = \frac{U_\infty L}{\nu}}$$
The Reynolds number is built on the free-stream speed $U_\infty$ and the plate length $L$, so
the formula is directly comparable with the textbook flat-plate result. If the plate height were some
general $b$ rather than exactly $\delta$, the same integration gives the more general
$C_D = 0.0245\,Re_L^{-1/7}(b/\delta)^{13/49}$, of which the boxed result is the case $b = \delta$.
Form the uniform-stream reference (part b). The same plate held in a uniform stream
$U_\infty$ — every strip now seeing the full free-stream speed — has
$$F_{unif} = 0.031\,Re_L^{-1/7}\;\tfrac12\rho U_\infty^{2}\,(2L\delta)$$
which is the ordinary two-sided flat-plate drag with no height integral at all.
Take the ratio and interpret it. Every factor cancels except the height integral:
$$\frac{F_D}{F_{unif}} = \boxed{\frac{49}{62} = 0.790}$$
so the plate sitting inside the boundary layer feels about 79 % of the uniform-stream
drag — only 21 % less. The instructive point is how weak that sheltering
is. Intuition suggests a large reduction, because the lower half of the plate sits in fluid moving far
slower than $U_\infty$. Two effects defeat that intuition. First, a one-seventh power law is extremely
blunt: at only 1 % of the layer thickness the local speed is already
$0.01^{1/7} = 52\;\%$ of $U_\infty$, so most of the plate is in fast-moving fluid. Second, the drag
scales as $u^{13/7}$ rather than $u^{2}$, so the friction law itself partially compensates for the
lower local speeds. A designer should therefore not expect much protection from burying a fin inside a
turbulent boundary layer.
Check: the strip method assumes each horizontal strip develops
its own boundary layer independently at the local speed — it ignores spanwise (vertical) shear
transport between strips and the horseshoe vortex that forms at the plate–wall junction. Both are
second-order for a thin plate aligned with the flow, and the strip result is the standard textbook
treatment of this configuration, but a real measurement would sit a few per cent above 0.790 because of
the junction flow.