Question 6 of 7: Phase and constituent fractions in an Al–8 wt% Cu alloy
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations, December 2019 — 16-Mec-B8 Engineering Materials. Three hours, open book; any non-communicating calculator is permitted. Seven problems, all of equal value; any five of them constitute a complete paper, so each problem carries 20 marks. Candidates are urged to submit a clear statement of any assumptions made. All seven problems are solved below, because the complete set is the study resource. Problems 2, 5 and 6 are to be answered against the figures reproduced on page 4 of the examination paper — the Callister cold-work curves, the eutectoid isothermal-transformation diagram and the aluminium-rich Al–Cu phase diagram.
Askeland & Wright, The Science and Engineering of Materials, 7th ed. — the primary syllabus text.
Callister & Rethwisch, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 10th ed. — the source of the three figures attached to this paper.
Shackelford, Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers, 8th ed.
Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy, 3rd ed. — true stress–strain and the flow curve.
Kalpakjian & Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology — drawing schedules, cold work and process annealing.
Fontana, Corrosion Engineering, 3rd ed. — the galvanic series in sea water.
Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 5th ed. — selection by property profile and material index.
Figure values (the copper cold-work curves for Problem 2, the eutectoid isothermal-transformation curves for Problem 5 and the Al–Cu phase boundaries for Problem 6) are read from the printed figures. Graph readings carry the usual chart-reading tolerance of roughly one part in twenty, which is stated wherever it changes an answer.
Question 6: Phase and constituent fractions in an Al–8 wt% Cu alloy (20 marks)
Given. An alloy of overall composition $C_{0} = 8$ wt% Cu, and the aluminium-rich end of the Al–Cu phase diagram reproduced on page 4. The invariant reaction printed on that diagram is in fact a eutectic at 548 °C, in which liquid decomposes into the aluminium-rich solid solution $\alpha$ and the intermetallic $\theta$ (CuAl2); the question calls it the eutectoid temperature, and the arithmetic requested is identical. Compositions read from the printed boundaries:
Compositions read from the page-4 Al–Cu diagram
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Alloy composition
$C_{0}$
8.0 wt% Cu
Invariant (eutectic) temperature
$T_{E}$
548 °C
Maximum solubility of Cu in $\alpha$ at $T_{E}$
$C_{\alpha}$
5.65 wt% Cu
Eutectic liquid
$C_{E}$
33.2 wt% Cu
$\theta$ (CuAl2) boundary
$C_{\theta}$
52.5 wt% Cu
$\alpha$ solvus at 350 °C
$C_{\alpha}(350)$
≈ 1.0 wt% Cu
Find. (a) the mass fractions of primary (proeutectic) $\alpha$ and primary $\theta$ immediately above 548 °C; (b) the total mass fractions of $\alpha$ and $\theta$ immediately below it; (c) the mass fractions of the eutectic $\alpha$ and eutectic $\theta$ alone; and (d) the mass fractions of $\alpha$ and $\theta$ at 350 °C.
The vertical dashed line is the 8 wt% Cu alloy. Each horizontal tie line joins the two phase boundaries at that temperature; the lever rule then splits the alloy between them.
Approach. Apply the lever rule on the tie line at each temperature. The alloy is hypoeutectic (8 wt% Cu lies between $C_{\alpha} = 5.65$ and $C_{E} = 33.2$), so on cooling it first deposits primary $\alpha$ and the last liquid to solidify has the eutectic composition. Immediately above the invariant the phases are $\alpha$ and liquid; immediately below they are $\alpha$ and $\theta$; and the eutectic constituent is simply whatever the liquid turned into, so the eutectic fractions are the differences between the totals and the primary amounts.
Part (a) — the tie line just above 548 °C. The two phases are $\alpha$ at 5.65 wt% Cu and liquid at the eutectic composition 33.2 wt% Cu. The lever rule puts the alloy composition at the fulcrum, so$$W_{\alpha'} = \frac{C_{E} - C_{0}}{C_{E} - C_{\alpha}} = \frac{33.2 - 8.0}{33.2 - 5.65} = \frac{25.2}{27.55} = \boxed{0.915}$$and the liquid that remains is $W_{L} = (8.0-5.65)/27.55 = 0.085$, which checks because the two must sum to unity.
Part (a) — primary $\theta$. Primary (proeutectic) $\theta$ can only form in a hypereutectic alloy, one whose composition lies to the copper-rich side of 33.2 wt% Cu, because only then does the alloy enter the $\theta + L$ field on cooling. At 8 wt% Cu the alloy enters the $\alpha + L$ field instead, so$$W_{\theta'} = \boxed{0}$$There is no primary $\theta$ in this alloy at any temperature. Saying so explicitly, with the reason, is what the part is testing.
Part (b) — the tie line just below 548 °C. The liquid has now transformed and the two phases present are $\alpha$ at 5.65 wt% Cu and $\theta$ at 52.5 wt% Cu. The tie line is much longer, so$$W_{\alpha} = \frac{C_{\theta} - C_{0}}{C_{\theta} - C_{\alpha}} = \frac{52.5 - 8.0}{52.5 - 5.65} = \frac{44.5}{46.85} = \boxed{0.950}$$$$W_{\theta} = \frac{C_{0} - C_{\alpha}}{C_{\theta} - C_{\alpha}} = \frac{2.35}{46.85} = \boxed{0.050}$$These are total phase fractions: they count every atom of $\alpha$ and of $\theta$ in the specimen, no matter which constituent it belongs to.
Part (c) — separate the eutectic constituent from the primary. The primary $\alpha$ formed above the invariant does not change as the liquid transforms, so the eutectic $\alpha$ is whatever total $\alpha$ is left over:$$W_{\alpha,\text{eut}} = W_{\alpha} - W_{\alpha'} = 0.9498 - 0.9147 = \boxed{0.035}$$All of the $\theta$ came out of the eutectic liquid, because there was no primary $\theta$, so$$W_{\theta,\text{eut}} = W_{\theta} = \boxed{0.050}$$The check is that the whole eutectic constituent must equal the liquid present just before the reaction: $0.0351 + 0.0502 = 0.0853 = W_{L}$, exactly as required.
Part (d) — the tie line at 350 °C. Below the invariant the $\alpha$ solvus falls steeply, and at 350 °C the printed curve gives $C_{\alpha} \approx 1.0$ wt% Cu while $\theta$ remains essentially stoichiometric at 52.5 wt% Cu. The tie line is longer still, so more $\theta$ must be present:$$W_{\alpha} = \frac{52.5 - 8.0}{52.5 - 1.0} = \frac{44.5}{51.5} = \boxed{0.864}$$and the balance of the specimen is the intermetallic,$$W_{\theta} = \frac{8.0 - 1.0}{51.5} = \frac{7.0}{51.5} = \boxed{0.136}$$The extra $\theta$ — the total rose from 0.050 to 0.136 — is the copper rejected from supersaturated $\alpha$ as the solvus falls. That rejection is the whole basis of precipitation hardening in the 2xxx aerospace alloys: solution treat above the solvus, quench to trap the copper, then age so that the $\theta$ appears as fine coherent $\theta''$ / $\theta'$ particles rather than the coarse equilibrium phase.
Question 6 — mass fractions
Quantity
Symbol / basis
Value
(a) Primary (proeutectic) $\alpha$, just above 548 °C
$(C_{E}-C_{0})/(C_{E}-C_{\alpha})$
0.915
(a) Primary $\theta$
alloy is hypoeutectic
0
(a) Liquid remaining just above 548 °C
$W_{L}$
0.085
(b) Total $\alpha$, just below 548 °C
$(C_{\theta}-C_{0})/(C_{\theta}-C_{\alpha})$
0.950
(b) Total $\theta$, just below 548 °C
$1-W_{\alpha}$
0.050
(c) Eutectic $\alpha$
$W_{\alpha}-W_{\alpha'}$
0.035
(c) Eutectic $\theta$
all $\theta$ is eutectic
0.050
(c) Check: eutectic constituent
$0.035+0.050$
0.085 = $W_{L}$ ✓
(d) $\alpha$ at 350 °C
$C_{\alpha}\approx 1.0$ wt% Cu
0.864
(d) $\theta$ at 350 °C
$1-W_{\alpha}$
0.136
Check: two of the six input compositions are read from the printed diagram and deserve a stated tolerance. The $\theta$ boundary is taken as 52.5 wt% Cu; stoichiometric CuAl2 is 54.1 wt% Cu, and using that value instead changes part (b) only from 0.0502 to 0.0486, under four per cent, so no verdict moves. The 350 °C solvus is the more sensitive figure: reading it as 0.8 wt% Cu rather than 1.0 shifts $W_{\theta}$ from 0.136 to 0.139. Quote the solvus value you used, as has been done here.