22-Mec-B9 Advanced Engineering Structures · December 2018
Question 4 of 8: Shear centre and shear flow in an idealised nose box
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2018 — 16-Mec-B9 Advanced Engineering Structures. Three hours, open book, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Eight questions are printed and the rubric states that any five constitute a complete exam paper, with all problems of equal total value (20 marks each). All eight are worked here. Marks for the individual parts are those printed inside each problem.
Reference texts. T. H. G. Megson, Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students, 6th ed. (thin-walled open and closed sections, shear flow, shear centre, multi-cell torsion, crack growth, laminated plates); A. P. Boresi and R. J. Schmidt, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed. (yield criteria, unsymmetrical bending, torsion of non-circular sections); N. E. Dowling, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 4th ed. (Paris law, linear elastic fracture mechanics); R. C. Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed. (statically indeterminate axial members, thermal stress).
Check: the direction of the 500 N load in Question 3. On the isometric view the 500 N arrow lies antiparallel to the direction in which both flanges project (both make the same 28° angle with the horizontal on the drawing, in opposite senses). The solution therefore takes the 500 N as acting away from the flange tips, so that its bending contribution puts the lower-flange tip A into tension and adds to the contribution of the 900 N load. Had the arrow been read the other way, the stress at A would be 122.5 MPa compressive instead of 155.3 MPa tensile; every section property and both moment components are unchanged, so only the sign of the 500 N load’s contribution (138.9 MPa of the 155.3) moves.
Check: two rubric details not printed on the paper. (i) Question 8 gives no mark split for its parts (a) and (b); an even 10 + 10 is assumed, consistent with every other two-part question on this sitting. (ii) In Question 4(b) “120 mm to the left of the shear center” is taken as 120 mm further forward, i.e. towards the semicircular nose, which is what “left” means on the printed figure. Moving the load the other way would simply reverse the sign of the superposed torsional flow.
Question 4: Shear centre and shear flow in an idealised nose box (20 marks)
Measure $x$ positive forward from the rear spar and $y$ positive upward from the axis of symmetry. The nose semicircle is centred at $(500,0)$ and so reaches forward to $x = 600$ mm.
Find. (a) the position of the shear centre, and (b) the shear flow in each of the four walls when the 15 kN load acts 120 mm forward of that point.
Question 4 — the idealised nose box. Booms carry all the direct stress and the walls carry only shear. The shear centre lies $e = 278.0$ mm forward of the rear spar; the shear flows shown are those for the load applied through the shear centre (part a), in N/mm, positive in the walk sense 1→2→3→4→1.
Approach. Cut the closed cell to get a statically determinate open flow, restore continuity with a constant closing flow found from the zero-twist condition, then locate the resultant by taking moments; part (b) superposes the pure torque produced by moving the load.
Compute the section second moment from the booms. The walls are effective in shear only, so all direct stress is carried by the four booms:$$I_{xx} = \sum B_r y_r^2 = 2(500)(100)^2 + 2(450)(100)^2 = 1.90\times10^{7}\ \text{mm}^4$$Because every boom sits at the same distance from the neutral axis, this is simply the total boom area times $100^2$.
Walk the open shear flow from a cut in the rear spar. Cutting wall 4–1 makes $q_b = 0$ there, and for a section with $I_{xy} = 0$ and $S_x = 0$ each boom crossed changes the flow by a fixed step,$$q_b^{(n+1)} = q_b^{(n)} - \frac{S_y}{I_{xx}}\,B_n y_n$$Because the walls carry no direct stress the flow is piecewise constant — there is no running integral to evaluate. Starting past boom 1 and walking 1→2→3→4:$$q_b(1\text{-}2) = -39.47,\quad q_b(2\text{-}3) = -75.00,\quad q_b(3\text{-}4) = -39.47,\quad q_b(4\text{-}1) = 0\ \ \text{N/mm}$$The walk closes exactly on zero at the cut, which is the arithmetic check on this step.
Restore continuity with the zero-twist condition (part a). For the load to pass through the shear centre the cell must not twist, so $\oint q/(Gt)\,\mathrm{d}s = 0$. With $G$ and $t$ both constant this collapses to a length-weighted mean and needs neither value:$$q_{s0} = -\frac{\oint q_b\,\mathrm{d}s}{\oint \mathrm{d}s} = -\frac{-63\,036}{1514.16} = +41.63\ \text{N/mm}$$The wall lengths are 500, $\pi(100) = 314.16$, 500 and 200 mm, summing to the perimeter 1514.16 mm.
Assemble the shear-centre flow set and check equilibrium. Adding $q_{s0}$ to each open flow gives$$q(1\text{-}2) = +2.16,\quad q(2\text{-}3) = -33.37,\quad q(3\text{-}4) = +2.16,\quad q(4\text{-}1) = +41.63\ \ \text{N/mm}$$A constant flow along a wall has a resultant equal to $q$ times the wall's chord, so the rear spar carries $41.63(200) = 8326$ N upward and the nose arc carries $33.37(200) = 6674$ N upward through its own chord; together exactly 15 000 N, while the top and bottom skins cancel horizontally. Overlooking the arc's chord is the easiest way to lose this check.
Locate the shear centre by moments. Taking moments about the mid-point of the rear spar, each wall contributes $q\times 2A_{\text{swept}}$, where the swept areas are $-50\,000$, $-131\,416$, $-50\,000$ and $0$ mm$^2$ (their sum is twice the enclosed area, $2\times115\,708$ mm$^2$, which confirms the geometry). Hence$$M_O = \sum q_i\,(2A_i) = 4.1695\times10^{6}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{mm}\quad\Longrightarrow\quad\boxed{e = \frac{M_O}{S_y} = 278.0\ \text{mm forward of the rear spar}}$$By the horizontal symmetry of the box the shear centre lies on the centreline, so no second coordinate is needed.
Superpose the torque for part (b). Shifting the same 15 kN load 120 mm further forward adds a pure torque about the shear centre,$$T = S_y e_{\text{off}} = 15\,000(120) = 1.80\times10^{6}\ \text{N}\cdot\text{mm}$$which a single cell carries as a uniform circulating flow$$q_T = \frac{T}{2A} = \frac{1.80\times10^{6}}{231\,416} = 7.778\ \text{N/mm}$$acting anticlockwise, i.e. $-7.778$ N/mm in the walk sense used above.
Add the two flow sets. Superposing gives the answer to part (b):$$\boxed{q(1\text{-}2) = -5.62,\quad q(2\text{-}3) = -41.15,\quad q(3\text{-}4) = -5.62,\quad q(4\text{-}1) = +33.85\ \ \text{N/mm}}$$The largest magnitude is 41.15 N/mm in the nose skin, a shear stress of $41.15/2 = 20.57$ MPa. Moving the load forward has relieved the rear spar by 19 per cent and increased the nose flow by 23 per cent.
It is worth pausing on why the shear centre sits so far forward — 278 mm ahead of the spar, more than half way to the nose. The rear spar is short (200 mm) and therefore an inefficient place to carry vertical load, whereas the nose arc presents the same 200 mm chord while also enclosing a large area. The vertical load therefore splits roughly evenly between the two, and the resultant of that pair acts well forward of the spar. This is the structural reason real wing torsion boxes are closed at a nose spar: the closed nose cell both carries shear and pulls the shear centre forward towards the aerodynamic centre, reducing the torsion the structure has to resist in flight.
Quantity
Value
$I_{xx}$ (booms only)
$1.90\times10^{7}$ mm$^4$
Closing flow for zero twist, $q_{s0}$
+41.63 N/mm
(a) Shear centre
278.0 mm forward of the rear spar, on the axis of symmetry