NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-MMP-A1 General Geology and Exploration · May 2018

Question 5 of 7: Geophysical Survey Methods for Mineral Exploration

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-MMP-A1 General Geology and Exploration, 2018-May. Closed book; only a Casio or Sharp approved calculator permitted. Questions 1–4 are compulsory; a candidate then completes ONE more question chosen from Questions 5, 6 or 7.

Reference texts: Guilbert & Park, The Geology of Ore Deposits (genetic classification, deposit-type descriptions throughout); Evans, Ore Geology and Industrial Minerals, 3rd ed. (deposit classification, structural controls on ore); Klein & Dutrow, Manual of Mineral Science, 23rd ed. (crystal systems, diagnostic physical properties, hand-specimen identification); Telford, Geldart & Sheriff, Applied Geophysics, 2nd ed. (gravity, magnetic, electrical, EM and seismic methods); Kearey, Brooks & Hill, An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration, 3rd ed. (survey design and method selection); Rose, Hawkes & Webb, Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration, 2nd ed. (sample-medium selection, dispersion patterns); Peters, Exploration and Mining Geology, 2nd ed. (drilling methods and sampling).

Question 5: Geophysical Survey Methods for Mineral Exploration (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

a) Five main geophysical survey methods

Principal geophysical exploration methods and the property each measures
MethodDescriptionPhysical property measured
MagneticMeasures small spatial variations in the strength/direction of the Earth's total magnetic field caused by underlying rock.Magnetic susceptibility and remanent magnetisation (chiefly controlled by magnetite/pyrrhotite content).
GravityMeasures minute variations in the Earth's gravitational acceleration from point to point across a survey area.Rock density (bulk density contrasts between adjacent rock units).
Electromagnetic (EM)An alternating primary field induces eddy currents in conductive subsurface bodies; the resulting secondary field is measured at surface (or from the air).Electrical conductivity of the subsurface.
Induced polarization (IP) / resistivityA current is injected into the ground through electrodes; resistivity measures the bulk resistance to current flow, while IP measures the decaying "chargeability" response left by polarisable minerals after the current is switched off.Electrical resistivity (resistivity survey) and chargeability (IP survey) – the latter is diagnostic of disseminated sulphides.
Radiometric (gamma-ray spectrometry)Measures natural gamma radiation emitted from the top few tens of centimetres of rock or soil, usually flown airborne.Concentration of the naturally radioactive elements potassium (K), uranium (U) and thorium (Th).

b) Best method for five specific exploration targets

Target-to-method matching
TargetBest methodWhy
(i) Pyrrhotite massive sulphide in a layered mafic complexElectromagnetic (EM)Massive sulphide is an excellent electrical conductor, giving a strong, unambiguous EM anomaly; magnetics is a valuable companion method here because pyrrhotite (unlike most sulphides) is itself magnetic.
(ii) Buried stream channel containing placer goldResistivitySaturated, unconsolidated channel gravel has a markedly different resistivity from the surrounding bedrock, allowing the buried channel's geometry (and hence the placer trap) to be mapped in cross-section.
(iii) Disseminated Pb and Zn in carbonate rocksInduced polarization (IP)The sulphides are too finely disseminated to form a continuous conductor for EM, but each grain still polarises and discharges under IP, which is specifically sensitive to disseminated (as opposed to massive) sulphide mineralisation.
(iv) Oil traps in a sedimentary basinGravityStructural traps (anticlines, salt domes, basin-margin faults) and the low density of a hydrocarbon-saturated reservoir relative to surrounding strata both produce recognisable gravity anomalies, the classical tool for regional basin and trap reconnaissance (seismic reflection is the modern industry-standard follow-up for detailed trap definition).
(v) Uranium ore in a conglomerateRadiometricUranium and its daughter isotopes are directly, uniquely detectable by their natural gamma emission, making radiometric surveying the fastest direct-detection tool for near-surface or subcropping uranium mineralisation.

c) Complicating factors inherent to the natural environment

Environmental complications by method
MethodComplicating factor
MagneticDiurnal variation of the Earth's magnetic field during the survey, and magnetic minerals in surficial cover (e.g. magnetite-rich till) that mask or mimic bedrock anomalies.
GravityRugged topography requires large, uncertainty-prone terrain corrections that can easily swamp the subtle density anomaly being sought.
Electromagnetic (EM)Conductive overburden (saline, clay-rich or graphitic weathered material) produces a strong near-surface response that can mask or be mistaken for a genuine bedrock conductor.
Induced polarization (IP) / resistivityClay-rich or conductive overburden and poor galvanic electrode contact in dry, resistive ground both distort the chargeability/resistivity response.
RadiometricVery shallow penetration depth (only the uppermost tens of centimetres) means vegetation cover, soil moisture and snow strongly attenuate the signal and can completely mask buried mineralisation.