NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-MMP-A2 Underground Mining Methods and Design · May 2013

Question 4 of 7: Cut-and-Fill versus Longhole Mining — Comparison

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-Mmp-A2 Underground Mining Methods and Design, 2013-May. 3 hours duration, closed book; only a Casio or Sharp approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory (40 marks, all seven parts 1.1–1.7); a candidate then selects FOUR of Questions 2–7 (each worth 15 marks).

Reference texts: Hartman & Mutmansky (eds.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. (underground mining methods, mine ventilation, shaft hoisting systems, backfill practice — the primary reference throughout this paper); BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia (Canadian regulatory context for mine ventilation and hoisting-plant safety); Wills & Finch, Wills' Mineral Processing Technology, 8th ed. (tailings thickening/filtration and paste preparation for backfill).

Question 4: Cut-and-Fill versus Longhole Mining — Comparison (15 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Cut-and-fill and longhole (sublevel open stoping) sit at opposite ends of the selectivity-versus-bulk-tonnage spectrum, and nearly every difference below traces back to one root cause: cut-and-fill fills the void as it goes (so it can follow an irregular, narrow orebody safely), while longhole leaves a large open void until the panel is finished (so it needs a wide, regular, self-supporting orebody to be safe at all).

Cut-and-fill vs. longhole open stoping
CriterionCut and fillLonghole (sublevel open stoping)
Geology, orebody shape/size/orientationNarrow to moderate width, irregular boundaries, any dip — the method follows the oreWide, regular, steeply dipping tabular or massive orebodies with well-defined, planar contacts
Host and ore rock propertiesTolerates weak to moderate host/ore rock (fill provides wall support)Needs competent, self-supporting host and ore rock able to stand an open span unsupported for the panel's life
Development size/amount/time to extractionExtensive access development per tonne (sill drifts on every lift); slower to first oreConcentrated top/bottom sill and ring-drill drift development; less development per tonne, faster to first ore once developed
Ground supportHeavy, recurring support (bolts/mesh/shotcrete) in every newly exposed lift backSupport concentrated in permanent access/drill drifts only; stope walls are largely unsupported
Mining sequence & mill feed rateSequential lift-by-lift; feed rate limited by the fill cure/strip cycle — lower, steadier ratePanel-by-panel drill-blast-muck; feed rate can be high and lumpy (large blasts) but paused for the panel outside blasting/mucking
Personnel numbers & skillsMore crews, more varied skills (drilling, bolting, fill placement) per tonne producedFewer personnel per tonne; specialised longhole drillers and LHD operators
Mechanized equipment types/numbersSmall-profile jumbo drills, bolters, fill-placement equipment, small LHDsLarge-diameter production drills (fewer units), large LHDs, minimal fill equipment
Cost of miningHigh unit cost ($/t) — fill cycle, support, low mechanization scaleLow unit cost ($/t) — bulk mechanized drill/blast/muck cycle
Mine lifeCan extend mine life by economically extracting narrow/marginal ore bulk methods would leaveExtracts a defined panel quickly; overall mine life set by total reserve and panel sequencing
Mining rateLow (tens to low hundreds of t/day per stope)High (hundreds to thousands of t/day per stope)
Dilution & recoveryLow dilution, high recovery — selective, boundary-following miningHigher dilution from wall sloughing/blast overbreak into the open void; recovery slightly lower unless well controlled
Pillar recovery methods/costPillars are largely avoided by design (fill supports the walls continuously)Rib/sill pillars often left between panels; recovered later by secondary longhole blasts, at extra cost and higher risk (unsupported void)
Post-mining stabilizationStope is left filled and self-supporting; minimal further stabilization neededVoid is backfilled (if at all) or left open/allowed to relax; larger, unfilled voids may need monitoring or eventual controlled collapse

In short, cut-and-fill trades cost and rate for selectivity and safety in poor ground, while longhole trades selectivity for the low unit cost and high rate that only a self-supporting, regular orebody can safely deliver.