NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-MMP-A2 Underground Mining Methods and Design · May 2015

Question 4 of 6: Kirchhoff's Laws, Atkinson's Equation and Four Parallel Mine Airways

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-MMP-A2 Underground Mining Methods and Design, 2015-May. 3 hours duration, closed book; only a Casio or Sharp approved calculator permitted. Question 1 is compulsory (40 marks, all six parts 1.1–1.6); a candidate then selects THREE of Questions 2–6 (each worth 20 marks).

Reference texts: Hartman & Mutmansky (eds.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. (underground mining methods, ground support, mine ventilation, shaft hoisting design, mine cost estimation — the primary reference throughout this paper); Hustrulid & Bullock, Underground Mining Methods: Engineering Fundamentals and International Case Studies (room-and-pillar, VCR, cut-and-fill and stope-and-pillar practice); BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia (Canadian regulatory context for hoisting-rope safety factors, ground support and heat-stress management); Camm, T.W. (1989/1991), Simplified Cost Models for Prefeasibility Mineral Evaluations, U.S. Bureau of Mines IC 9298 (source of the Question 5 parametric cost models); O'Hara, T.A. (1980), "Quick Guides to the Evaluation of Orebodies," CIM Bulletin, February 1980 (Question 1.5.3).

Question 4: Kirchhoff's Laws, Atkinson's Equation and Four Parallel Mine Airways (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Kirchhoff's first (nodal/continuity) law states that at any junction of a ventilation network the air flowing in must equal the air flowing out — applied directly below to split the known total 47.19 m3/s among the four parallel airways. Kirchhoff's second (loop/mesh) law states that around any closed circuit in the network the algebraic sum of head losses (including any fan heads or natural ventilation pressure within the loop) is zero; it is the tool used to balance a branched series–parallel network with more than one path between two points, and is not needed for this purely-parallel four-airway problem, which is closed with the nodal law alone. Atkinson's equation, $H = RQ^2$, gives the frictional head loss of a single airway from its resistance $R = kPL/A^3$ (friction factor, rubbing perimeter, length and cross-sectional area) and quantity Q; because all four airways here connect the SAME two points (a single junction to a single junction), Kirchhoff's second law forces every airway to carry the identical head loss H, which is exactly the physical fact the parallel combination rule below is built on. Ventilation engineers use these three relationships together, iteratively (in hand calculation, or via a Hardy-Cross-type network solver such as VnetPC/Ventsim for a real branched mine circuit), to size fan duty and confirm that every working place receives its required minimum air quantity.

Given.

Four parallel mine airways
AirwayResistance R (N·s2/m8)Resistance (in·min2/ft6)
12.62723.50
20.1511.35
30.3493.12
40.3973.55

Total quantity through the parallel network: $Q_{tot} = 47.19\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}$ (100,000 cfm).

A B Airway 1, R=2.627, Q1=4.50 Airway 2, R=0.151, Q2=18.77 Airway 3, R=0.349, Q3=12.35 Airway 4, R=0.397, Q4=11.58 Q_tot=47.19 Q_tot=47.19
Four airways in parallel between the same two junctions A and B, each seeing the identical head loss H (Kirchhoff's second law) and dividing the total quantity by Kirchhoff's first law.

Find. The equivalent resistance Req, the common head loss H, the individual branch quantities Q1–Q4, and their sum.

Approach. Because all four airways share the same two end nodes, each carries the same head loss H (Kirchhoff's second law), so $Q_i = \sqrt{H/R_i}$ for every branch; summing the branches and equating to the known total gives the parallel combination rule $1/\sqrt{R_{eq}} = \sum 1/\sqrt{R_i}$, from which Req, then H, then each Qi follow in turn.

  1. Part 4.1 — equivalent resistance. Since $Q_{tot}=\sqrt{H}\sum(1/\sqrt{R_i})$ and also $Q_{tot}=\sqrt{H/R_{eq}}$, equating the two gives the square-root (not reciprocal-sum) combination law for airways in parallel: $$\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{R_{eq}}} = \sum_{i=1}^{4}\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{R_i}} = \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2.627}}+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{0.151}}+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{0.349}}+\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{0.397}} = 0.6170+2.5734+1.6927+1.5871 = 6.4702$$ $$\boxed{R_{eq} = \dfrac{1}{6.4714^2} = 0.02389\ \text{N}\cdot\text{s}^2/\text{m}^8}$$
  2. Part 4.2 — head loss of the parallel combination. Applying Atkinson's equation to the equivalent single-airway resistance found in Step 1 at the known total quantity: $$H = R_{eq}Q_{tot}^2 = (0.02389)(47.19)^2 = \boxed{53.19\ \text{Pa}}$$
  3. Part 4.3 — quantity in each airway. Every airway shares the same H found in Step 2, so $Q_i=\sqrt{H/R_i}$ for each:
    Individual airway flows
    AirwayR (N·s2/m8)Qi=√(H/Ri) (m3/s)
    12.6274.50
    20.15118.77
    30.34912.35
    40.39711.58
    $$\boxed{Q_1=4.50,\ Q_2=18.77,\ Q_3=12.35,\ Q_4=11.58\ \ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}$$ The lowest-resistance airway (2) carries by far the largest share, as expected — quantity divides in inverse proportion to $\sqrt{R_i}$, not to $R_i$ directly.
  4. Part 4.4 — sum of the branch flows. $$\sum Q_i = 4.50+18.77+12.35+11.58 = \boxed{47.19\ \text{m}^3/\text{s}}$$ This reproduces the given total quantity exactly, confirming the equivalent-resistance calculation of Step 1 and the head-loss calculation of Step 2 are internally consistent.
Question 4 — final numeric results
ItemResult
4.1 Equivalent resistance Req0.02389 N·s²/m&sup8;
4.2 Head loss H53.19 Pa
4.3 Q1, Q2, Q3, Q44.50, 18.77, 12.35, 11.58 m³/s
4.4 Sum of flows47.19 m³/s (= given total, closure check)