24-MMP-A3 Mineral Processing · December 2017
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-MMP-A3 Mineral Processing, 2017-Dec. 3 hours duration, closed book; only an approved Casio or Sharp calculator permitted. Question 3 allows a choice of any six (6) of nine sub-terms. Question 5 and its bonus (page 5) were to be handed in with the exam booklet; Question 4's log-log plot (page 6) is reproduced here as a computed inline figure.
Reference texts: Wills & Finch, Wills' Mineral Processing Technology, 8th ed. (flotation circuit design and metallurgical balances – Ch. 12; comminution, Bond's law and circulating load – Ch. 3 & 6; particle size analysis – Ch. 4; sampling theory, Gy's equation – Ch. 3; gravity concentration, dense medium separation, magnetic/electrostatic separation – Ch. 10, 11 & 13); Taggart, Handbook of Mineral Dressing (classical economic-recovery/economic-efficiency formula used in Question 1(v)).
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
Given. %−200 mesh: rod mill discharge 5%, ball mill discharge 20%, cyclone overflow 30%, cyclone underflow 15%; new (fresh) feed $F_{new}=100\ \text{t/h}$.
Find. Solids flowrate in the cyclone underflow, t/h.
Approach. Grinding does not change solids mass, so the cyclone's own feed carries the same %−200 mesh as the ball mill discharge (dilution water added afterwards, in the sump, changes % solids but not the size distribution of the solids). Apply the two-product formula around the cyclone using %−200 mesh as the tracer, then close the overall solids balance around the whole circuit (new feed in = product out, in steady state) to get the underflow tonnage.
Given. Ball mill discharge (= cyclone feed solids) $=300\ \text{t/h}$ at 75% solids; cyclone overflow $=100\ \text{t/h}$ solids at 40% solids; cyclone underflow $=200\ \text{t/h}$ solids at 75% solids (2(i)).
Find. Water added to the sump, t/h.
Approach. Convert each stream's solids tonnage to slurry tonnage via its %solids, get the water content of each, then close a water balance around the sump (water in from the mill + dilution water = water leaving in the cyclone feed = water in overflow + water in underflow).
Given. Work index $W_i=14$; new feed to the closed circuit (rod mill discharge) $F_{80}=3600\ \mu\text{m}$; final circuit product (cyclone overflow) $P_{80}=289\ \mu\text{m}$; new feed rate $100\ \text{t/h}$.
Find. Net power drawn by the ball mill, kW.
Approach. For a ball mill closed with a classifier, Bond's law is applied across the whole closed-circuit duty: new feed entering the circuit down to the classifier's overflow (the actual finished product), not the mill's own single-pass discharge, since the recirculating load already accounts for repeated regrinding of oversize.
Check. $F_{80}$ is taken as the rod mill discharge (material entering the ball-mill/cyclone closed circuit) and $P_{80}$ as the cyclone overflow (the circuit's actual finished product) – the standard Bond convention for a closed-circuit mill, and the only pairing of the four surveyed streams that represents the full size-reduction duty the ball mill/classifier combination performs. Using the ball mill's own single-pass feed/discharge instead would understate the work actually done, since it would ignore that most of the ball mill's feed is coarser recycled underflow, not fresh rod-mill product.
Given. Underflow 75% solids by weight; ore SG 3.0; water SG 1.0.
Find. Slurry SG.
| Part | Result |
|---|---|
| (i) Cyclone underflow solids (circulating load) | 200 t/h (200%) |
| (ii) Dilution water | 116.7 t/h |
| (iii) Ball mill net power | 590 kW |
| (iv) Cyclone underflow SG | 2.00 |