NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-MMP-A4 Mine Valuation and Mineral Resource Estimation · May 2016

Question 5 of 29: Project Net Present Value

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-Mmp-A4 Mine Valuation and Mineral Resource Estimation, 2016-May. 3 hours duration; one handwritten 8.5×11 in reference sheet permitted (not an open-book exam); only approved Sharp or Casio calculators allowed. Question 1 is compulsory (40 marks, parts 1.1–1.6); candidates then select THREE of the six optional Questions 2–7 (20 marks each) to complete the paper.

Reference texts: Isaaks & Srivastava, An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics (variogram modelling, kriging estimators, volume–variance relations); Hustrulid, Kuchta & Martin, Open Pit Mine Planning and Design (mine valuation, NPV and cut-off grade methodology, mineable reserves); Gentry & O'Neil, Mine Investment Analysis (Canadian mining taxation, inflation and financing effects on DCF yield, smelter/refining contract terms, net smelter return); SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. (mineral exploration/evaluation stages, ore reserve classification, ore deposit models); CIM Best Practice Guidelines and NI 43-101 (Canadian Securities Administrators).

Question 1.5: Project Net Present Value (5 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Revenue and expenditure by year, Year 0–6 (table above); discount rate r = 10%; end-of-year convention (Year 0 cash flow occurs at valuation date, t = 0, undiscounted).

Find. NPV of the project at r = 10%.

0123456-5-10-20+5+10+20+20Q1.5 Net Cash Flow, CAD millions, Years 0-6period (year)
Fig. 1.5 – Net cash flow (Revenue − Expenditure) by year: heavy early-year outlays (development, Years 0–2) followed by positive production-year cash flow (Years 3–6).

Approach. Net each year's cash flow (Revenue − Expenditure), then discount each year's net cash flow back to Year 0 at 10% and sum.

  1. Net cash flow by year. $$CF_t = \text{Revenue}_t - \text{Expenditure}_t$$ giving CF0=−5, CF1=−10, CF2=−20, CF3=+5, CF4=+10, CF5=+20, CF6=+20 ($ millions).
  2. Discount each year at 10%. $$PV_t = \frac{CF_t}{(1.10)^t}$$ PV0=−5.000, PV1=−9.091, PV2=−16.529, PV3=+3.757, PV4=+6.830, PV5=+12.418, PV6=+11.289 ($ millions).
  3. Sum the present values. $$NPV = \sum_{t=0}^{6}\frac{CF_t}{(1.10)^t} = -5.000-9.091-16.529+3.757+6.830+12.418+11.289$$ $$\boxed{NPV \approx \$3.68\text{ million}}$$
QuantityValue
NPV @ 10%, end-of-year convention$3.68 million (positive)
Check
The project clears a positive NPV at the 10% discount rate despite three consecutive negative-cash-flow years (0–2) – the Year 5–6 production cash flow ($20M/yr net) is large enough, even discounted 5–6 years, to overcome the front-loaded $35M of net development outlay.