24-MMP-A6 Mining and the Environment · December 2014
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
EGBC National Exam — Mining and Mineral Processing Engineering, 09-MMP-A6 Mining and the Environment, 2014-Dec. 3 hours duration, open book (any non-communicating calculator permitted). Six questions of equal value (20 marks each) constitute the bank; a candidate answers any FIVE, with only the first five questions appearing in the answer book marked. Most questions require an essay-format or point-form answer.
Reference texts: BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Low Carbon Innovation, Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in British Columbia (current edition) (permitting, reclamation and closure planning requirements); Canadian Dam Association (CDA), Dam Safety Guidelines (2013/2019 update) (dam classification, tailings dam consequence categories, freeboard/PMF design basis, dam safety review and inspection intervals); Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM, 2020) (tailings governance, design and closure principles); Price, W.A., MEND Report 1.20.1, Prediction Manual for Drainage Chemistry from Sulphidic Geologic Materials (1997/2009) (acid-base accounting, neutralizing potential ratio screening criteria); International Network for Acid Prevention (INAP), Global Acid Rock Drainage (GARD) Guide (ARD prediction, prevention and treatment across the mine lifecycle); Vick, S.G., Planning, Design, and Analysis of Tailings Dams, 2nd ed. (upstream/centreline/downstream embankment construction methods); Government of Canada, Metal and Diamond Mining Effluent Regulations (MDMER, the current name for the exam's "MMER") under the Fisheries Act; Government of Canada, Impact Assessment Act (successor to the 2012 Canadian Environmental Assessment Act); Mining Association of Canada, Towards Sustainable Mining Tailings Management Protocol; International Cyanide Management Institute, International Cyanide Management Code.
Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.
A fourth, complementary technique – relocating or progressively shrinking the active decant pond away from areas scheduled for near-term reclamation, or pumping the pond down with a reclaim/decant system – is often combined with the three methods above on real projects.
| Hazard category | Engineering investigation required |
|---|---|
| Mine entry points (portals, adits, shafts, raises) | Engineer permanent closure of every opening – concrete bulkhead plugs, engineered caps, or bat-friendly gates where wildlife access must be preserved – sized to prevent public entry and structural collapse over the long term; inspect and stabilize collar structures before capping. |
| Mine working areas / ground stability & subsidence | Locate and characterize all old workings and crown pillars from mine records and survey; stope/pillar stability analysis; delineate surface subsidence risk zones; design backfilling, pillar reinforcement or surface exclusion zones where subsidence risk cannot be eliminated. |
| Mine gas | Characterize residual gas generation (methane, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulphide, radon) from remaining broken rock, old workings and any residual organic material; assess whether passive venting, permanent sealing, or active ventilation is required at each opening; install gas-monitoring wells where a closed void could accumulate gas that migrates to surface or to adjacent occupied structures. |
| Groundwater | Predict post-closure water-table rebound and flooding rate of the underground workings; confirm the final discharge point(s) and design a passive or active (perpetual, if required) treatment system sized for the predicted long-term flow and chemistry; characterize residual acid-generating potential of exposed sulphide zones and assess whether controlled flooding (oxygen exclusion, Question 2b) is an effective long-term ARD control compared to perpetual treatment. |
| Surface waste rock piles and tailings facility | Geotechnical stability analysis of surface waste piles and the tailings dam; design erosion control and, where PAG material is present, a source-control cover (Question 2c); dam stability analysis, closure cover design and long-term seepage/water management (Questions 4 and 5). |
| Surface infrastructure | Plan demolition and removal of buildings, plant and equipment; identify and remediate contaminated soils at fuel storage, assay laboratory and ore-handling areas; safely dispose of remaining hazardous materials, and reclaim haul roads no longer needed while retaining the minimum access required for long-term monitoring. |
| Long-term monitoring, maintenance and financial assurance | Design a monitoring program (groundwater and surface water quality, subsidence markers, gas concentrations, structural integrity of bulkheads/plugs and dams) with defined trigger and contingency-action levels; produce and periodically update a full closure cost estimate covering every item above, held as financial surety per the mining licence requirement. |