NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-MMP-B2 Rock Fragmentation · May 2015

Question 3 of 7: Drilling Accuracy

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, 09-Mmp-B2 Rock Fragmentation, May 2015, 3 hours, closed book (one double-sided aid sheet permitted). Five (5) questions constitute a complete paper; every question (1-7) is answered in full as a complete study resource.

Reference texts: Persson, Holmberg & Lee, Rock Blasting and Explosives Engineering; C.J. Konya & E.J. Walter, Rock Blasting and Overbreak Control (FHWA); ISEE, Blasters' Handbook, 18th ed.; W. Hustrulid, Blasting Principles for Open Pit Mining; SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed., Ch. Drilling and Blasting.

Question 3: Drilling Accuracy (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Parameters affecting drilling accuracy

Collaring accuracy (setup/layout error at the surface); rig alignment and mast rigidity – poor levelling or mast flex lets the hole start off the design angle; rod/steel stiffness and hole depth – long, slender strings deflect and "walk" under their own weight and the bit's side-load, especially in angled holes; ground structure – bedding, joints and alternating hard/soft bands deflect the bit toward the path of least resistance; bit type and condition – a worn or asymmetrically-worn bit drills off-line; operator skill and drill guides/stabilisers; and vibration/torque control during drilling.

(b) Implications of drilling inaccuracy

Hole deviation changes the actual burden and spacing seen by each charge, which directly distorts the design powder factor at that point in the pattern: excessive local burden gives poor fragmentation, toe problems (unbroken rock at the bench floor) and violent confined "cratering"; insufficient local burden risks flyrock and airblast from an under-confined charge venting toward the free face; converging/diverging holes can cause holes to intersect (sympathetic detonation risk while loading) or leave unbroken pillars between them; and cumulative deviation over a multi-row round degrades overall fragmentation uniformity, muckpile shape and dig rates.

(c) Compensating for faulty drilling

FaultCompensation
Excessive burdenIncrease charge/powder factor locally (heavier bottom charge) or, if severe, add a satellite/relief hole between the intended and actual toe position.
Insufficient burdenReduce the charge in that hole (shorter column, more stemming) and/or increase stemming length to control flyrock/airblast risk.
Short holesIncrease subdrilling on adjacent holes to compensate the toe, or accept a higher powder factor bottom charge in the short hole; expect a toe ridge to require secondary breakage if not corrected.
Long holesReduce charge length (raise the bottom of the charge with extra inert fill) to avoid excessive subdrilling and undesirable sub-grade damage/vibration.
Smaller diameter (than design)Increase charge length (lower stemming top) to recover the design charge mass, since mass per metre falls with the diameter squared; reassess burden/spacing as they were sized for the larger design diameter.
Larger diameter (than design)Reduce charge length / increase stemming to avoid over-charging, or accept the extra mass only if the pattern's burden/spacing is widened to match – otherwise reduce explosive density (aerated product) to hold mass constant.

(d) Control of air bailing (flushing) velocity in drilling

Air-bailing (cuttings-removal) velocity up the annulus is controlled primarily by the compressor air volume and pressure delivered down the drill string relative to the annular flow area (hole diameter minus drill-pipe/rod diameter) – a wider annulus at the same air volume gives a lower uphole velocity. It must be kept above the minimum cuttings-lifting (terminal settling) velocity for the largest expected chip size and rock density, which in turn depends on rock hardness/friability (harder rock → larger, denser chips needing higher velocity), hole depth (frictional and hydrostatic air losses increase with depth, reducing effective bottom-hole velocity for a given surface supply), and hole deviation/inclination (an inclined or deviated hole lets cuttings settle back on the low side unless velocity is increased further).