NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

25-Nav-A1 Fundamentals of Naval Architecture · May-98-Nav-A1 2016

Question 7 of 7: Inclining Experiment & Heel After Removing a Slack Tank's Free Surface

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Examinations, May 2016 — 98-Nav-A1 Fundamentals of Naval Architecture, 3 hours, closed book (5 questions constitute a complete exam paper, first five as they appear in the answer book are marked, each of equal value; all 7 answered below for full study coverage).

Reference texts: Tupper, Introduction to Naval Architecture; Lewis (ed.), Principles of Naval Architecture (PNA); IMO, International Code on Intact Stability (IS Code).

Question 7: Inclining Experiment & Heel After Removing a Slack Tank's Free Surface

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

(a) Precautions during an inclining experiment

An inclining experiment must isolate the single relationship it is designed to measure — heel angle versus a known, precisely-located weight shift — from every other influence on trim and heel, so the standard precautions are: conduct it in calm water, sheltered from wind and current, with all mooring lines slack; use only 2–3 known test weights, moved a precisely measured transverse distance, with their exact position recorded at each stage; ensure all loose/movable weights (cranes, lifeboats, cargo-handling gear) are secured in a known position, and that no personnel move about during a reading; use two or more pendulums (or a manometer/inclinometer) at different locations to cross-check readings and average out local effects; press up (completely fill) or completely empty all slack tanks to eliminate free-surface effects, and record the actual conditions of any tank that cannot be pressed up; take readings only after the ship has settled and stopped oscillating following each weight shift; and record the actual draft/trim/water density at the time of the test so the measured $GM$ can be corrected to the required loading condition.

(b) Heel angle after removing the oil tank's free surface

Given. The inclining-experiment pendulum reading gives an apparent $GM$ that is reduced by the on-board oil tank's free-surface effect (the tank is only half full — 4.00 m of 8.00 m depth — hence slack); once that free surface is removed, the ship's actual (solid) $GM$ governs a second, different weight shift.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Lightship displacement$\Delta$3500.00 tonnef
Pendulum angle (test 1)$\theta_1$1.3°
Weight shifted (test 1)$w_1$6.00 tonnef, $d_1=10.00$ m
Oil tank$l\times b\times $ depth7.50 × 15.00 × 8.00 m, oil level 4.00 m, SG 0.8
Weight shifted (test 2)$w_2$25.00 tonnef, $d_2=10.00$ m, oil removed

Find. The heel angle for the second weight shift, once the tank's oil has been completely removed.

WL oil surface (4 m of 8 m — slack) pendulum, θ₁ = 1.3° test wt. 1: 6 t × 10 m P S tank centreline = ship centreline step 2: oil removed ⇒ no more free surface
Transverse section: the slack oil tank reduces the ship's effective $GM$ during the inclining test; once emptied, the ship's actual (solid) $GM$ applies to the second weight shift.

Approach. Back out the apparent $GM$ from the pendulum reading, add the tank's free-surface correction to recover the ship's actual solid $GM$, then apply the small-angle heeling formula to the second (post-removal) weight shift, for which no tank free-surface term remains.

  1. Apparent $GM$ from the inclining test. With $\tan\theta_1=w_1d_1/(\Delta\,GM_{app})$ and $\theta_1=1.3^\circ$ ($\tan1.3^\circ\approx0.022693$): $$GM_{app}=\frac{w_1d_1}{\Delta\tan\theta_1}=\frac{6.00(10.00)}{3500.00(0.022693)}\approx0.7554\text{ m}$$
  2. Free-surface correction of the slack tank. The tank's own free-surface inertia is $i=\dfrac{l\,b^3}{12}=\dfrac{7.50(15.00)^3}{12}=2109.4\text{ m}^4$ (independent of the 4 m oil depth), and $\nabla=\Delta/\rho_{sw}=3500.00/1.025\approx3414.6\text{ m}^3$: $$FSC=\frac{0.8}{1.025}\cdot\frac{2109.4}{3414.6}\approx0.4821\text{ m}$$
  3. Ship's actual (solid) $GM$. The pendulum reading during test 1 already reflects the reduced, fluid $GM$, so the ship's real $GM$ is recovered by adding back the correction: $$GM_{actual}=GM_{app}+FSC=0.7554+0.4821\approx\boxed{1.238\text{ m}}$$
  4. Heel after emptying the tank and shifting the second weight. With the oil completely removed, the tank has no liquid and hence no free surface, so the ship's stability is governed directly by $GM_{actual}$ (wall-sided, small-to-moderate angle): $$\tan\theta_2=\frac{w_2d_2}{\Delta\,GM_{actual}}=\frac{25.00(10.00)}{3500.00(1.238)}\approx0.05772$$ $$\boxed{\theta_2\approx3.30^\circ}$$
Question 7 — final results
QuantityValue
Apparent $GM$ (test 1, tank slack)$\approx 0.755$ m
Tank free-surface correction$\approx 0.482$ m
Ship's actual (solid) $GM$$\approx 1.238$ m
Heel after test-2 weight shift (tank emptied)$\approx 3.30^\circ$
Check: the ship's total displacement and vertical CG are assumed unchanged between the two weight shifts (i.e. the roughly 360 tonnef of oil removed from the tank, and any resulting change in $KG$, is not separately re-derived, since no additional hydrostatic data are given to do so) — the question's intent is to test the free-surface concept from part (a), namely that emptying a slack tank recovers the ship's full solid $GM$.
Back to the paper →