Question 1 of 8: Statically Indeterminate Truss — Energy Method
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
National Exams, May 2016 — 98-Mar-A5 Advanced Strength of Materials, 3 hours, open book, non-communicating calculator permitted (any five of the eight problems constitute a complete paper, all equal value; all eight answered below for full study coverage).
Reference texts: Boresi & Schmidt, Advanced Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed.; Hibbeler, Mechanics of Materials, 10th ed.; Timoshenko & Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed.
It is solved as the strength-of-materials exam it actually is.
Question 1: Statically Indeterminate Truss — Energy Method (equal value)
Given. Plane truss with top chord E–F–G and bottom chord A–B–C–D, all horizontal and vertical bars 1 m long (verticals EA, FB, GC; diagonals AF, FC, GD). Support A is a pin, supports B and C are rollers (vertical reaction only), D is a free joint carrying the 17 kN load. A 10 kN horizontal load acts at E. All eleven members share the same axial rigidity $EA$ (not stated numerically — see callout below).
Given data
Quantity
Value
Panel length (horizontal & vertical bars)
1 m
Horizontal load at E
10 kN, $+x$
Vertical load at D
17 kN, downward
Support A
pin ($A_x,A_y$)
Supports B, C
rollers ($B_y$, $C_y$)
Find. Member forces $N_{FG}$, $N_{GD}$, $N_{CD}$.
Truss geometry (1 m panels): top chord E–F–G, bottom chord A–B–C–D, verticals EA/FB/GC, diagonals AF/FC/GD. Pin at A, rollers at B and C.
Approach. Count degrees of indeterminacy, choose the reaction at B as the redundant, and use Castigliano's second theorem (unit-load / force method) on the resulting determinate primary structure to enforce zero vertical deflection at B.
Degree of static indeterminacy. Members $m=11$, reactions $r=4$ ($A_x,A_y,B_y,C_y$), joints $j=7$: $m+r=15$ against $2j=14$ equilibrium equations, so the truss is indeterminate to the first degree — a pure statics solution is impossible and an energy method is required, matching the question's instruction.
Primary structure and redundant. Remove the roller at B (redundant $X=B_y$); the remaining pin-at-A/roller-at-C truss is determinate ($m+r=11+3=14=2j$). Solve it twice by the method of joints: once for the real loads ($N_0$, 10 kN at E and 17 kN at D) and once for a unit upward unit-load at B ($n$, dimensionless per kN).
Compatibility (Castigliano/unit-load). With every member sharing the same $EA$, the true vertical deflection at B must vanish:
$$\delta_B=\sum\frac{N_0\,n\,L}{EA}+X\sum\frac{n^2L}{EA}=0\ \Rightarrow\ X=-\frac{\sum N_0 n L}{\sum n^2 L}$$
Summing over all 11 members (lengths 1 m for chords/verticals, $\sqrt2$ m for diagonals) gives $\sum N_0 n L=3.500\text{ kN}\cdot\text{m}$ and $\sum n^2L=2.9142\text{ m}$, so
$$\boxed{X=B_y=-\frac{3.500}{2.9142}=-1.201\text{ kN}}$$
(negative: the roller at B actually pulls down, i.e. the redundant reaction acts opposite the assumed upward sense).
Superpose and recover the target members. $N=N_0+X\,n$ for every bar. For the three requested members:
$$\boxed{N_{FG}=17.00\text{ kN (T)}\qquad N_{GD}=24.04\text{ kN (T)}\qquad N_{CD}=17.00\text{ kN (C)}}$$
Equilibrium check. With $X$ found, the full reaction set is $A_x=-10.00\text{ kN}$, $A_y=-12.90\text{ kN}$, $B_y=-1.20\text{ kN}$, $C_y=31.10\text{ kN}$; $\sum F_x=-10+10=0$, $\sum F_y=-12.90-1.20+31.10-17=0$, and summing moments about A also closes to zero. Repeating the whole procedure with $C_y$ chosen as the redundant instead of $B_y$ reproduces the identical $N_{FG}, N_{GD}, N_{CD}$, confirming the result is redundant-choice independent, as it must be.
Question 1 — final results
Quantity
Value
Redundant reaction $B_y$
$-1.201\text{ kN}$ (1.201 kN downward)
Force in FG
$17.00\text{ kN}$, tension
Force in GD
$24.04\text{ kN}$, tension
Force in CD
$17.00\text{ kN}$, compression
Check: no member cross-section/modulus ($EA$) is given in the source, so the standard assumption for this problem type — every bar shares the same axial rigidity $EA$ — is used; $EA$ then cancels exactly out of the compatibility equation (only the geometry/length ratios matter), so the reported member forces do not depend on the (unstated) value of $EA$.